El_Machinae said:"Too late"? Maybe to catch up to people abusing work systems, sure.
Abusing?


El_Machinae said:"Too late"? Maybe to catch up to people abusing work systems, sure.
Maybe to catch up to people abusing work systems, sure.
Speedo said:Abusing? Hell, if F@H had a function to run when a machine was idle, or start and stop at a specific time, I'd suggest to my boss (PC services manager) that we put it on all of our desktops. Well, maybe not all, but at least the ones in our building. I think they'd probably do it too, they generally love the "easy" charitable stuff.
Of course in its current state it just won't work. No one wants it running constantly as a service, and having to start and stop it manually means it will never run... not to mention probably driving more than a few people crazy.
El_Machinae said:"Too late"? Maybe to catch up to people abusing work systems, sure. But, every fold you do speeds the process.
How much time should it take to complete one 'step' (on an Intel Celeron@2800 && 512 DDR) ?
Speedo said:It's not "bad," I just don't like it because you don't have any way to check on it or see its progress, and you have to go to the trouble of opening Services to start or stop it.
Blasphemous said:So how can I get F@H to work as a service?