True communism is impossible - it is only a hypothesis and a sweet dream of some dreamers.
Life in the USSR was massively better than what it replaced, in comparison to what it replaced it was a proletariat's paradise
Yeah. The only real change for the worse was the religious persecution.
Yeah. The only real change for the worse was the religious persecution.
Virtually anything would have been better than what the USSR replaced, as far as the average dude's (or average chick's) life went.Life in the USSR was massively better than what it replaced
I would rather live under the Tsar than Stalin???? Neither regime is pleasant but you could at least criticise the Tsar or leave Russia. Under Stalin not so much.
You'd have had a hard time criticizing the Tsar, assuming you actually could read and write, without bringing the okhrana down on your ass.
I would rather live under the Tsar than Stalin???? Neither regime is pleasant but you could at least criticise the Tsar or leave Russia. Under Stalin not so much.
And extending persecution towards all religions was a wonderful step towards equity.Yeah because Imperial Russia was bastion of religious freedom and tolerance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Jewish_pogroms_in_the_Russian_Empire
That's irrelevant to one's ability or lack thereof to criticize the tsarist regime. Stop fogging the issue.The okhrana had nothing on the NKVD. Being ent to Siberia under the Tsar wasn't great. Under Stalin it was a virtual death sentence. Stalin himself spent time in the Tsars camps. Pity the bastard survived them.
Aye, because the Tsarists would never, for example, have thousands of civilians killed and wounded during a peaceful protest lead by a priest. No, they would merely give the protesters a stern look, thus dispersing them back to their hovels.I would rather live under the Tsar than Stalin???? Neither regime is pleasant but you could at least criticise the Tsar or leave Russia. Under Stalin not so much.
Aye, because the Tsarists would never, for example, have thousands of civilians killed and wounded during a peaceful protest lead by a priest. No, they would merely give the protesters a stern look, thus dispersing them back to their hovels.
![]()
And, because a cruel fate adores irony, the protesters weren't even criticising the Tsar himself- they were petitioning him for aid, believing that their conditions were the result of the disinterest of ministers and capitalists, and the Tsar, if only he knew, would act with benevolence fitting his station. They weren't revolutionaries, just hungry, freezing peasants. A few thousand butchered rather put paid to that idealism, I'm afraid to say.
Second, I don't think something "turning out like the USSR" is necessarily a bad thing. I would rather have lived in the Soviet Union thirty years ago than China even today.
But if USSR is the yardstick to be held up against, I am nonetheless confident that we could build a much greater society than what existed there.
Aye, because the Tsarists would never, for example, have thousands of civilians killed and wounded during a peaceful protest lead by a priest. No, they would merely give the protesters a stern look, thus dispersing them back to their hovels.