Suggestions and Requests

Again, to make Athens the best city spot, simply move the clam 1S so it benefits Libya. However, moving the marble to Athens would also make sense, in addition.
 
Ooh, good idea. In general, real capitals should be the best spots, if possible!

Which makes Japan a hard case, since their capital moves. I often world build a seafood resource within Kyoto to Tokyo around 1700.
 
But both have rich food resources? 5 and 3 within city radius(I wanted to say BFC, but what does it stand for?:crazyeye:) respectively.
 
BFC stands for Big Fat Cross.

I still find Kyoto superior to Tokyo until I make that move.
 
So it refers to the 21 tiles the city can work on, right?

Kyoto has no fresh water, so I don't really like the city, what a waste of :food:.
 
• Adding and removing uranium for better historical gameplay. China doesn't have any, but France does? France got it from Africa.

The Uranium is here to represent the Limousin uranium sites, which were enough to sustain our nuclear programs for a while. In quantity it's probably not much but without it we wouldn't have been on such a nuclear frenzy for the past 50 years so its impact means it probably deserves to be there.
 
Natives shouldn't have UB. Seriously, seeing them building ikhandas in Danni Bàa is ridiculus.

How do you actually see it? With WB? It is not a big deal, helps Natives with maintenance.
 
You make Turkey strongser and with more mights!

And greats and Very a lot of powerfulls!
Make turkey stronger,greater and more powerful with more knights (or might).
Fixed the grammar and Make Iran stronger. Ottomans are too powerful already.
 
How do you actually see it? With WB? It is not a big deal, helps Natives with maintenance.

I played a game in debug mode. It's really interesting. You can see the AI part of the game.
 
I hope there's an option to disband your own city. Just like razing one, it turns the city into ruins and imposes penalty in the expansion category.
 
It is exploitable. Making it indepedent maybe, but which city will accept being destroyed? There was this feature in CivIII but it was always strange to me that this option was present.
 
Critical mass?

The point when a nuclear bomb explodes. :nuke: I think that Leoroth is humourously suggesting that having a patriotic Iranian and a patriotic Turk in the same discussion is going to to cause an explosion soon. :mischief:
 
I hope there's an option to disband your own city. Just like razing one, it turns the city into ruins and imposes penalty in the expansion category.

Yes, please!!! It existed in Civ 3 and was very useful.
 
The point when a nuclear bomb explodes. :nuke: I think that Leoroth is humourously suggesting that having a patriotic Iranian and a patriotic Turk in the same discussion is going to to cause an explosion soon. :mischief:
And from this day on, STFF shall be my prophet and interpret my words.

(You can be pretty sure that I'm joking in some way when my sentences are not properly punctuated.)
 
The point when a nuclear bomb explodes. :nuke: I think that Leoroth is humourously suggesting that having a patriotic Iranian and a patriotic Turk in the same discussion is going to to cause an explosion soon. :mischief:

Well,the patriotic Turk left. So no explosiveness
 
Back
Top Bottom