GoodGame
Red, White, & Blue, baby!
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2004
- Messages
- 13,725
Realistically, you shouldn't have underage house parties. They're a PITA to manage, and the adults opened themselves up to the consequences. You have 2 people trying to supervise 40 people who don't want to be supervised. Practical? NO.
Realistically, the cops have to detain everyone at the scene for questioning (did anyone drink? who supplied the alcohol? did anything else happen (rape, sodomy, etc...)? ) and probably breathlyze anyone obviously under the influence. An even worse case is if someone left the party drunk in a car with a bunch of friends in tow and had a serious accident, DUI linked in one way or another to the house party. It could have been worse, really.
A night in jail is better than losing one's house to civil awards related to a DUI injury/fatality stemming from one's house party. Maybe the arrest wasn't warranted if there wasn't evidence of intent to distribute?
What's so wrong with noise ordinance laws?
Realistically, the cops have to detain everyone at the scene for questioning (did anyone drink? who supplied the alcohol? did anything else happen (rape, sodomy, etc...)? ) and probably breathlyze anyone obviously under the influence. An even worse case is if someone left the party drunk in a car with a bunch of friends in tow and had a serious accident, DUI linked in one way or another to the house party. It could have been worse, really.
A night in jail is better than losing one's house to civil awards related to a DUI injury/fatality stemming from one's house party. Maybe the arrest wasn't warranted if there wasn't evidence of intent to distribute?
What's so wrong with noise ordinance laws?