The last Antisemitic Events

[Grisu]

Pray tell, how does one promote 'homosexualism'?

Buttons, T-Shirts, bumper stickers, etc..

 

[Borachio]

Door-to-door salesmen, telesales, cold-calling...

Wearing pink and mincing down the street...

Calling "coo-eee!"...

 

[Dostayer]

WOW, comparing Homosexualism to Sex with animals is way out of sense...
Yes, Gays tend to be a little annoying (mostly those who live in Tel-Aviv), but not everyone like this, and we are fighting for rights.
And BTW, Sweden is considered one of the most progressive states when it comes to Gay Rights.
And again we went way out of topic

 

[Domen]

And BTW, Sweden is considered one of the most progressive states when it comes to Gay Rights.

True, but unfortunately it is one of the least progressive ones when it comes to Non-Gay Rights.

 

[Princeps]

Homosexualism is not the same as homosexuality:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=homosexualism&defid=4075261

You are right. The difference is that while homosexuality is a very real human feature, homosexualism is just a fabrication of your overactive imagination.

It is no -ism to demand that harmless human personal traits ought to be tolerated.

 

[Domen]

Tolerated - yes. But not promoted.

Soon Sweden will sterilize heterosexuals because homosexual couples can't breed (and we need equal rights for everyone, you know)...

They already want males to stop pissing while standing (males have a choice, and this is unfair, because females can only urinate while sitting):

http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=506629

Modern Sweden is simply becoming a "Stalinist" regime.

 

[Princeps]

Tolerated - yes. But not promoted.

Oh. I've yet to encounter this. And in any case, its perfectly within reason and the right of an individual to promote a different (and indeed quite harmless) "lifestyle" (if you want to see it as such and not as a genetic predisposition)... even to children. There is really no cause to complain. People are allowed to hear a variety of opinions and form their own views, even children.

I don't think homosexuality is actively promoted in public schools in any official capacity. I find the opposite to be true to some extent, at least from my own experience.

Soon Sweden will sterilize heterosexuals because homosexual couples can't breed (and we need equal rights for everyone, you know)...

Yes, I can totally see that coming.



Equal rights do not mean destroying natural features you are born with.

They already want males to stop pissing while standing (males have a choice, and this is unfair, because females can only urinate while sitting):

Um. So peeing while sitting turns you gay?

 

[Domen]

its perfectly within reason and the right of an individual to promote a different (and indeed quite harmless) "lifestyle"

The right of an individual, with use of his or her own money.

Not the right of a government, and not with use of money paid by these taxpayers who take care for replacement rate.

Um. So peeing while sitting turns you gay?

So peeing while standing means discriminating women and showing male chauvinism?

... even to children.

Why should homosexuality be promoted to children? Do you want extinction of humans?

 

[Princeps]

Not the right of a government, and not with use of money of these taxpayers who take care for replacement rate.

First of all, can you show me any example of a government policy that actually promotes homosexuality rather than the toleration of homosexuality? I can't name any.

So peeing while standing means discriminating women and showing male chauvinism?

What?

We were talking about gays.

And I don't care if I have to sit to pee in public toilets. No such law could possibly be enforced inside our homes, or actually even within public toilets. So all that such a law would amount to in practice is banning urinals, i suppose.

But in any case, no such law exist and no support for such law exists in any broad extent, not even in Sweden.

Why should homosexuality be promoted to children? Do you want extinction of humans?

Why not? I don't necessarily mean it should be promoted in any formal capacity.

I'm saying, I don't care if children are exposed to the "gay agenda". Most will still grow to become heterosexual and those who grow up or are predisposed toward homosexuality will be more healthier and comfortable with their identities.

Homosexuality will never become a threat to human reproduction.

 

[Domen]

First of all, can you show me any example of a government policy that actually promotes homosexuality rather than the toleration of homosexuality?

So you really haven't read anything about public kindergartens and primary schools which brainwash small children with LGBT stuff ???

 

[Old Hippy]

The right of an individual, with use of his or her own money.

Not the right of a government, and not with use of money of these taxpayers who take care for replacement rate.

I'm sure the country has child care, by your reasoning that is discrimination against gays, so if everyone is discriminated against ... the society is one of equality

So peeing while standing means discriminating women and showing male chauvinism?

No, you are entitled to sit if you want

Do you want extinction of humans?

we will all be dead before that happens

 

[Domen]

we will all be dead before that happens

So you don't care for future generations?

No, you are entitled to sit if you want

But feminists want to ban peeing while standing.

I'm sure the country has child care, by your reasoning that is discrimination against gays

No, public child care is not discrimination against gays.

BTW - do you want to establish public gay care, or what ???

 

[Princeps]

So you really haven't read anything about public kindergartens and primary schools which brainwash small children with LGBT stuff ???

Do they say you must be gay or you're evil or something? No.

 

[Domen]

Why not? I don't necessarily mean it should be promoted in any formal capacity.

Why not? This is simple. Because biologically males are adapted to procreate with females and inversely.

Of course if someone wants to be homosexual, then OK. But homosexuality should not be promoted.

Do they say you must be gay or you're evil or something? No.

No. But tey say "there is no need to be gay, but being gay is so awesome, unlike being an evil heterosexual".

I'm saying, I don't care if children are exposed to the "gay agenda". Most will still grow to become heterosexual and those who grow up or are predisposed toward homosexuality will be more healthier and comfortable with their identities.

But heterosexuals - 95% of the society - will be much less healthy and less comfortable with their identities, after exposed to "gay agenda".

It is a lesser evil if gays are exposed to "hetero agenda". Or - preferably - if nobody is exposed to any kind of agenda.

Homosexuality will never become a threat to human reproduction.

Not the main threat, but combined with other threats it can be dangerous. Look at Europe. Look at TFRs in European countries:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_fertility_rate

You should promote homosexuality in Africa or in Bangladesh. In those region they really need to reduce numbers of children.

 

[Princeps]

No. But tey say "there is no need to be gay, but being gay is so awesome, unlike being an evil heterosexual".

Not they don't. They say you can have a fulfilling life regardless of your sexual orientation.

And in any case, the sexual culture of our society is overwhelmingly heterosexual. The female body, for example, is everywhere on display in a manner that would have been shocking a century ago.

But heterosexuals - 95% of the society - will be much less healthy and less comfortable with their identities, after exposed to "gay agenda".

Well I'm not. Who the hell is uncomfortable with the predominant universally accepted orientation?

Not the main threat, but combined with other threats it can be dangerous. Look at Europe. Look at TFRs in European countries:

TFR is affected largely by the level of prosperity. Its moving toward 2 children per woman regardless of culture.

In any case, I don't share your concern. Modest fertility actually enhances prosperity and doesn't threaten it.

 

[Domen]

They say you can have a fulfilling life regardless of your sexual orientation.

And this is why they force boys to dress like girls and girls to dress like boys, etc. ???

This and other similar "exercises" are traumatic for small children, not fulfilling...

 

[Old Hippy]

But feminists want to ban peeing while standing

citation needed...

No, public child care is not discrimination against gays.

well then, neither is any money spent on gay issues, they pay taxes too, and we would not want to discriminate against Holy taxpayers would we

BTW - do you want to establish public gay care, or what ???

of course I do... I want care for everybody

 

[Domen]

very much so

OK so I assume that you also don't care for the global warming, for the environment, etc.

In case of me - I care about nature only as long as harm to nature means harm to humans. Which is quite often the case.

Of course we cannot destroy our environment, because this will mean our own destruction.

citation needed...

http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=506629


Link to video.

of course I do... I want care for everybody

Except for future generations, of course...

well then, neither is any money spent on gay issues, they pay taxes too, and we would not want to discriminate against Holy taxpayers would we

If 5% of the population are gays and 95% are heteros, then spent money on gay issues and on hetero issues in the same proportion (1 to 19).

Currently they are spending money on gay issues, while not spending any money on hetero issues.

They are not organizing hetero parades, promoting hetero families, hetero love, they are not teaching gays to embrace heteros. Etc., etc., etc.

 

[Old Hippy]

so a bloke, a hetrosexual bloke, a male politician, teaches his son to pee siting down for his postrate health...
I missing something, like, where are the feminists asking for this...

 

[Princeps]

And this is why they force boys to dress like girls and girls to dress like boys, etc. ???

This and other similar "exercises" are traumatic for small children, not fulfilling...

I love the rotten misogyny in your post. Making boys to dress as girls is traumatic (and certainly not a simply an interesting experience), but would you really be saying that if a girl was made to dress as a boy? Of course not.

So, how many public institutions of education or child care have such a policy? I want reliable studies or sources not anecdotes or sensationalist articles from the Mail.

Also I want any evidence that once in a childhood experience of dressing as a girl will somehow drastically alter your sexual identity later.