Remind me to question again about the mitochondrial aging in the germline, and why we assume it doesn't happen.
I'm waiting for him to explain how information gets "lost" not gained when a gene gets longer with a new sequence.The Last Conformist said:Other than that, I just want to point out I'm still waiting for diablodelmar's reference for rickets causing thick strong bones.![]()
Erik Mesoy said:Anybody feel like cataloguing everything we're waiting for?
I've sent your original post about it to some biologically informed folks, and from the replies this far, it appears your asumptions are wrong - the average quality of the mitochondria in a woman's ova doesn't decrease during her lifetime.El_Machinae said:Remind me to question again about the mitochondrial aging in the germline, and why we assume it doesn't happen.
Eran of Arcadia said:Except now you have to strike #1 off the list . . .
Tenochtitlan said:Oh, forgot to say, clever thread title, Perfection.Good jorb.
Yeah, it's becoming less and less a boxing match and more and more gang-rape.Fifty said:you guys have scared all the creationists away!
carlosMM said:diablo has informed me via PM, along with some serious self-rightoues preaching, that he withdraws from the thread as the gets 'flamed' a lot. I told him not so, he has not replied so far.
The Last Conformist said:I've sent your original post about it to some biologically informed folks, and from the replies this far, it appears your asumptions are wrong - the average quality of the mitochondria in a woman's ova doesn't decrease during her lifetime.
There is no Oort cloud - its still just a hypothesis! We know nothing of it!
Please provide:Another question: How come all the oldest reefs around today are measured to be around 4000 years old? If the earth is billions and billions and billions and billions of years old, then how come we don't have a coral reef somewhere that is older than a mere few K years old?