Well, Hobbsyoyo, in the future, when someone extends the Olive Branch, keep your unsolicited personal assessment to yourself...Which was exactly the response I expected. I had hopes maybe we could talk this out, but whatever.
I don't think this thread should be used for a cover from which to launch into a public diatribe about why we dislike each other. I'm pretty sure a moderator already said the same thing in this thread.I tried to explain why I couldn't do that. I hoped for a response that listed your problems with me that explain why you attack me so viciously so that we could talk it over, perhaps come to an understanding or some sort of gentleman's agreement.
I don't think this thread should be used for a cover from which to launch into a public diatribe about why we dislike each other. I'm pretty sure a moderator already said the same thing in this thread.
That's what PM is for if you simply had to discuss it all before you could move on.
Launching into an unsolicited diatribe is not a two way discussion just because at the end of the thrashing you toss in... You can say what bothers you about me now.People can discuss why they have issues with other posters in this thread. It's happened before and there's no reason why it can't happen again. You're entirely missing the point I was trying to make and ignoring what I have to say on the matter when you describe my post as a diatribe.
Never thought of that!
Still, wouldn't like to trouble them that often.
Here it is, Lord Joakim.
You seemed upset to me. I apologize for assuming things.
Lord Joakim - We've already buried ours, but I genuinely like most of your posts
Indeed - I should have PMed you sooner. And I hope you are keeping our current back-and-forth at arms length, the way it's intendedPeterGrimes - We've PMed and ironed out things, glad for it!
And, for the record... GW16 is probably the most dog piled on person here, him and MisterCooper... I think a lot of people owe these two an apology. My unsolicited 2 cents anyhow.
I've actually had that talk with him... about how I would read my old stuff... and how my perspectives have changed.Indeed - I should have PMed you sooner. And I hope you are keeping our current back-and-forth at arms length, the way it's intended![]()
I'm glad you mentioned the dog piling around GW16 and MC. I'm guilty of it, and I hate it.
GW doesn't have as many years behind him as some of us - and for that he should be envied
I re-read something I wrote for a personal journal project in high school, and I was shocked at how my words came across to my older self. Reading them 20 years later was a very, Umm, interesting experience. It's not fair, kind, reasonable, or fruitful to demand of a teenager the same perspective as a person who's been working at a crappy job for longer than he's been alive. When I read his posts I wonder how his views will change through time, as they certainly will, and I hope he sticks around so we can take part in that, vicariously. None of us can do our own lives over.
And as regards MC, I always look forward to his opinions, as they bring me far from my normal. And diversity of opinion can only broaden a discussion.
Seriously, that guy is like the mathematician of conservative thought - so pure, and standing far out in front of the practical applications ala that xkcd that I'm failing to link![]()
I've actually had that talk with him... about how I would read my old stuff... and how my perspectives have changed.
Happens to us all... ideas change with the times, if you're paying attention anyhow.
Barbarians like me get laid. Do nerds like you get some?![]()
Now that's one olive branch we can all get behind!
Could be a shemale?
Could be a shemale?