If you learned that therapeutic cloning (making stem cells to treat diseases like Parkinson's and Paralysis) could be done without making a viable embryo* first, would you ethically object to it? In other words, if no viable embryo is ever created.
(*a viable embryo is one which could grow into a fetus (and onward) if implanted into a prepared woman)
Edit: Please note that "Yes" means that you still have an issue with therapeutic cloning!
Edit: Something to point out. A 'therapeutic clone' is a cell type that is made from a person's DNA. This cell can be turned into any type of cell in the body, and will be used by placing these cells in the body, or by replacing parts of certain organs. Only a small clump of cells will be used to recover bone marrow or the liver or the brain. It is NOT the generation of anything more human.
(*a viable embryo is one which could grow into a fetus (and onward) if implanted into a prepared woman)
Edit: Please note that "Yes" means that you still have an issue with therapeutic cloning!
Edit: Something to point out. A 'therapeutic clone' is a cell type that is made from a person's DNA. This cell can be turned into any type of cell in the body, and will be used by placing these cells in the body, or by replacing parts of certain organs. Only a small clump of cells will be used to recover bone marrow or the liver or the brain. It is NOT the generation of anything more human.