U.S. Military Taught Officers: Use ‘Hiroshima’ Tactics for ‘Total War’ on Islam

Aroddo

Emperor
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
1,127
Location
Sauerkrautistan
Full Article on wired.com



The U.S. military taught its future leaders that a “total war” against the world’s 1.4 billion Muslims would be necessary to protect America from Islamic terrorists, according to documents obtained by Danger Room. Among the options considered for that conflict: using the lessons of “Hiroshima” to wipe out whole cities at once, targeting the “civilian population wherever necessary.”

The course, first reported by Danger Room last month and held at the Defense Department’s Joint Forces Staff College, has since been canceled by the Pentagon brass. It’s only now, however, that the details of the class have come to light. Danger Room received hundreds of pages of course material and reference documents from a source familiar with the contents of the class.

The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recently ordered the entire U.S. military to scour its training material to make sure it doesn’t contain similarly hateful material, a process that is still ongoing. But the officer who delivered the lectures, Army Lt. Col. Matthew A. Dooley, still maintains his position at the Norfolk, Virginia college, pending an investigation. The commanders, lieutenant colonels, captains and colonels who sat in Dooley’s classroom, listening to the inflammatory material week after week, have now moved into higher-level assignments throughout the U.S. military.

For the better part of the last decade, a small cabal of self-anointed counterterrorism experts has been working its way through the U.S. military, intelligence and law enforcement communities, trying to convince whoever it could that America’s real terrorist enemy wasn’t al-Qaida — but the Islamic faith itself. In his course, Dooley brought in these anti-Muslim demagogues as guest lecturers. And he took their argument to its final, ugly conclusion.

“We have now come to understand that there is no such thing as ‘moderate Islam,’” Dooley noted in a July 2011 presentation (.pdf), which concluded with a suggested manifesto to America’s enemies. “It is therefore time for the United States to make our true intentions clear. This barbaric ideology will no longer be tolerated. Islam must change or we will facilitate its self-destruction.”

Dooley could not be reached for comment. Joint Forces Staff College spokesman Steven Williams declined to discuss Dooley’s presentation or his status at the school. But when asked if Dooley was responsible for the course material, he responded, “I don’t know if I would classify him [Dooley] as responsible. That would be the commandant” of the school, Maj. Gen. Joseph Ward.

That makes the two-star general culpable for rather shocking material. In the same presentation, Dooley lays out a possible four-phase war plan to carry out a forced transformation of the Islam religion. Phase three includes possible outcomes like “Islam reduced to a cult status” and “Saudi Arabia threatened with starvation.” (It’s an especially ironic suggestion, in light of today’s news that Saudi intelligence broke up the most recent al-Qaida bombing plot.)

International laws protecting civilians in wartime are “no longer relevant,” Dooley continues. And that opens the possibility of applying “the historical precedents of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki” to Islam’s holiest cities, and bringing about “Mecca and Medina['s] destruction.”


Dooley’s ideological allies have repeatedly stated that “mainstream” Muslims are dangerous, because they’re “violent” by nature. Yet only a few of al-Qaida’s most twisted fanatics were ever caught musing about wiping out entire cities.

“Some of these actions offered for consideration here will not be seen as ‘political correct’ in the eyes of many,” Dooley adds. “Ultimately, we can do very little in the West to decide this matter, short of waging total war.”

Dooley, who has worked at the Joint Forces Staff College since August 2010, began his eight-week class with a straightforward, two-part history of Islam. It was delivered by David Fatua, a former West Point history professor. “Unfortunately, if we left it at that, you wouldn’t have the proper balance of points of view, nor would you have an accurate view of how Islam defines itself,” Dooley told his students. Over the next few weeks, he invited in a trio of guest lecturers famous for their incendiary views of Islam.

Shireen Burki declared during the 2008 election that “Obama is bin Laden’s dream candidate.” In her Joint Forces Staff College lecture, she told students that “Islam is an Imperialist/Conquering Religion.” (.pdf)

Stephen Coughlin claimed in his 2007 master’s thesis that then-president George W. Bush’s declaration of friendship with the vast majority of the world’s Muslims had “a chilling effect on those tasked to define the enemy’s doctrine.” (.pdf) Coughlin was subsequently let go from his consulting position to the military’s Joint Staff, but he continued to lecture at the Naval War College and at the FBI’s Washington Field Office. In his talk to Dooley’s class (.pdf), Coughlin suggested that al-Qaida helped drive the overthrow of Egyptian strongman Hosni Mubarak and Libyan dictator Muammar Gadhafi. It was part of a scheme by Islamists to conquer the world, he added. And Coughlin mocked those who didn’t see this plot as clearly as he did, accusing them of “complexification.”

Coughlin titled his talk: “Imposing Islamic Law – or – These Aren’t the Droids Your Looking For!”

Former FBI employee John Guandolo told the conspiratorial World Net Daily website last year that Obama was only the latest president to fall under the influence of Islamic extremists. “The level of penetration in the last three administrations is deep,” Guandolo alleged. In his reference material for the Joint Forces Staff College class, Guandolo not only spoke of today’s Muslims as enemies of the West. He even justified the Crusades, writing that they “were initiated after hundreds of years of Muslim incursion into Western lands.”

Guandolo’s paper, titled “Usual Responses from the Enemy When Presented With the Truth” (.pdf), was one of hundreds of presentations, documents, videos and web links electronically distributed to the Joint Forces Staff College students. Included in that trove: a paper alleging that “it is a permanent command in Islam for Muslims to hate and despise Jews and Christians” (.pdf). So was a video lecture from Serge Trifkovic, a former professor who appeared as a defense witness in several trials of Bosnian Serb leaders convicted of war crimes, including the genocide of Muslims. A web link, titled “Watch Before This Is Pulled,” supposedly shows President Obama — the commander-in-chief of the senior officers attending the course — admitting that he’s a Muslim.

Dooley added the caveats that his views are “not the Official Policy of the United States Government” and are intended “to generate dynamic discussion and thought.” But he taught his fellow military officers that Obama’s alleged admission could well make the commander in chief some sort of traitor. “By conservative estimates,” 10 percent of the world’s Muslims, “a staggering 140 million people … hate everything you stand for and will never coexist with you, unless you submit” to Islam. He added, “Your oath as a professional soldier forces you to pick a side here.” It is unclear if Dooley’s “total war” on Muslims also applied to his “Muslim” commander in chief.

After the Pentagon brass learned of Dooley’s presentation, the country’s top military officer, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey, issued an order to every military chief and senior commander to get rid of any similar anti-Islam instructional material. Dempsey issued the order because the White House had already instructed the entire security apparatus of the federal government — military and civilian — to revamp its counterterrorism training after learning of FBI material that demonized Islam.

By then, Dooley had already presented his apocalyptic vision for a global religious war. Flynn has ordered a senior officer, Army Maj. Gen. Frederick Rudesheim, to investigate how precisely Dooley managed to get away with that extended presentation in an official Defense Department-sanctioned course. The results of that review are due May 24.

Ironically, Dooley and his guest lecturers paint a dire picture of the forward march of Islamic extremism right as its foremost practitioner feared its implosion. Documents recently declassified by the U.S. government revealed Osama bin Laden fretting about al-Qaida’s brutal methods and damaged brand alienating the vast majority of Muslims from choosing to wage holy war. Little could he have known that U.S. military officers were thinking of ways to ignite one.
 
There are Islamophobes in important positions of power in the US military who don't have a clue why the Geneva Conventions were adopted after WWII, and who now wish to use the same tactics against Muslims? I am stunned to find that out.

And I love his propaganda. You see, only the "liberals" are silly enough to be completely fooled and have stuck their heads in the sand...



Good thing he is smart enough to be able to see the "truth", while the rest of us can't:



This is is really no different than the propaganda campaigns against Islam taught to FBI agents and various police departments since 9/11. It would have been more of a surprise if it hadn't happened.
 
Somedays I wonder if we were really the good guys in the Cold War...
 
Just ask Eisenhower.
 
And here I thought people stop thinking in "good guys" categories when they leave puberty.
 
Dooley added the caveats that his views are “not the Official Policy of the United States Government” and are intended “to generate dynamic discussion and thought.”

It's common practise in leadership and management training to have an outside speaker come in and espouse a completely ridiculous world-view which challenges the audience's most basic perceptions (normally of their own morality) in order to force them to defend their convictions - the idea being that it introduces future leaders to having to deal with total self-doubt and not allowing it to confuse their purpose. That said, I think this was just a nutcase who was allowed in through an admin error - it seems Gen. Dempsey isn't pleased, and he's not a man I'd want angry at me.
 
The only surprising thing here is that such attitude was expressed openly.

We were in terms of the "ideals", but in terms of actions to enforce those ideals.... there were no good guys in the cold war.
And in terms of ideals there were no bad guys.
 
It's common practise in leadership and management training to have an outside speaker come in and espouse a completely ridiculous world-view which challenges the audience's most basic perceptions (normally of their own morality) in order to force them to defend their convictions - the idea being that it introduces future leaders to having to deal with total self-doubt and not allowing it to confuse their purpose. That said, I think this was just a nutcase who was allowed in through an admin error - it seems Gen. Dempsey isn't pleased, and he's not a man I'd want angry at me.
Only this obviously wasn't an isolated case or a management training exercise. It has been the topic of a number of threads regarding rampant Islamophobia in various governmental agencies, and how it is part of their regular indocrination.

At least one general in the military has finally decided to take appropriate action to try to end it.
 
More proof that we spend entirely too much money on the military.
 
It is astounding that it takes so little to get a country as powerful as the USA in a total annihilation mindset.

Firebombing Mekka sounds a bit extreme to me and yet they are cautioning against muslim extremism ... like destroying Mekka will make everything better somehow.

Of course, doing so will have the "positive" effect of making the war-on-terror permanent ... which is obviously terrible for everyone involved apart from military contractors.

Thank god that this guy wasn't in a position to make those decisions - he only taught those who might be in a position to make them later.
 
Only this obviously wasn't an isolated case or a management training exercise. It has been the topic of a number of threads regarding rampant Islamophobia in various governmental agencies, and how it is part of their regular indocrination.

At least one general in the military has finally decided to take appropriate action to try to end it.

Looking at that slide, I'm becoming more and more convinced that this wasn't intended as an anti-Islam presentation, but as a serious discussion on the moral issues of asymettric warfare - however it's evidently very easy to mistake for Muslim-bashing, and far from out of the question that many of the officers could have left the room having taken away that message.
 
Hopefully the Americans will see sense and make a glass crater out of the ME soon.
 
skimped through the OP , see the Star Wars mentality is getting in and so on .

while it is risky to generalize , it is still out there that the thing is coloured by extra stuff . Not much problem , in the Cold War the Russians were treated in the same way . Russians were dangerous ; ı hear they could be serious pigs but they still lacked the red skin , tail and the horns . Not much different from the West , and ı have a couple of stories on Turkish style which ı won't share . Only because they wouldn't bring much honour to my country . People have go and kill people , it invariably involves concentrating on the negatives ...

though one could still pay extra attention . There have been papers on why Americans alternate between the "book" , proved to be working ever since started by the British in the Malaysia of 1950s and provoking the people so that their entire run of successes get into danger . Take Afghans , they are not a bunch of primitive savages or even animals intent on cutting every throat that does not belong to them , but people who have been much delayed . It is indeed possible to move them forward , certain arm twisting allowed and applied in cases .

americans , on the other hand , are perfectly capable of ruining months of work -and bribes- in a single day , they can burn copies of a particular religious text to distribute another . Why ? Converting in this age is archaic , ı would guess ...
 
have delved more into text and ı must say , a certain number of people in Turkey are certain that Obama is a Jew and they talk of a recent cover and story of a magazine . The New Yorker or something similar to that name . ( Not me who have ranted too much on why Obama has no need to be a Muslim either . )

regarding El Kaide it does not represent a gross threat or anything like that , they follow orders when some dudes order them , but than this would lead us straight to 911 conspiracies . As such one wouldn't expect to see an end to them anytime soon .

and the dudes do not have some brown types in robes either , apart from the Saudi double agent foiling the bomb plot , a strategy site ı follow under a false name due to their banning me , has this sparkling revelation that Israel needs Saudi as a bulwark against Iran , apparently by "official" declarations to newspapers , to which site regulars replied that it was so well known that nobody actually talked about it .
 
You guys understand we maintain a nuclear arsenal, correct? Why exactly is the idea ofa total war with population centers as targets being an option a revelation to anyone?
 
Top Bottom