The Capo
godless Heathen
I agree, I also think many of them are busy or actively working on something else. So I actually don't think we need to split the thread up. I just think there aren't enough unit-makers to do the requests.
Unit requests thread
- Thread starter Thunderfall
- Start date
The_Coyote
Emperor
such new thread would only make sense if somebody (and not meaning me) will track the open request on the front page of the thread (perhaps with number of persons woh request and initial data). Some more threads like this wouldn´t be really fruitful.
But also like The Capo said, there aren´t a lot request takers atm here, but nevertheless a survey could be nice (it could always be an inspiration)
But also like The Capo said, there aren´t a lot request takers atm here, but nevertheless a survey could be nice (it could always be an inspiration)
The Capo
godless Heathen
Well, my main point is that it won't actually result in more organization but rather less organization. Look at the LH request threads, yes threadS. IgorS wanted to make one because the one made previously wasn't being kept up very well (itself a "new" version because the old version wasn't being maintained). So they put IgorS' up and not only did it not get stickied, but the old thread is STILL being used (possibly more than the new one). So now there are two LH request threads for basically no reason at all.
Now, what you guys are trying to do is organize them into different threads. I am assuming something similar to what they have in the db; ancient, medieval, renaissance, industrial, modern, sci-fi, fantasy, other. Which means there will be, including this one, 8 to 9 threads. I can guarantee you that some will hardly get used at all, others will be used more, and this one will STILL continue to be used. Thus what you would be doing is dividing them up and making it much more difficult to keep track of. I just don't think it is necessary, that's all, I am not against it per se. I just think it is a fruitless effort.
Now, what you guys are trying to do is organize them into different threads. I am assuming something similar to what they have in the db; ancient, medieval, renaissance, industrial, modern, sci-fi, fantasy, other. Which means there will be, including this one, 8 to 9 threads. I can guarantee you that some will hardly get used at all, others will be used more, and this one will STILL continue to be used. Thus what you would be doing is dividing them up and making it much more difficult to keep track of. I just don't think it is necessary, that's all, I am not against it per se. I just think it is a fruitless effort.
Le Sage
Emperor
I agree. There's really no use. There are hardly any unit makers that take up on the proposals either. I think this serves its purpose well as it is. Mostly, when you request a unit, you get links to units that may be considered similar to those you request, but it's not like the artists are in here just dying to go to work. And fine like that.
The Capo
godless Heathen
What does that accomplish?
avain
(key)
I'd kindy ask for saibotlieh's Great Prophet to be re-transplated to a female settler:
http://forums.civfanatics.com/downloads.php?do=file&id=14673
or to add settler_female_md_foundcity.kf to her animation package.
Thanks!
http://forums.civfanatics.com/downloads.php?do=file&id=14673
or to add settler_female_md_foundcity.kf to her animation package.
Thanks!
Glaeder
Glaeder Ethribine Wodism
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2009
- Messages
- 147
That would eliminate misunderstandings and create order and easy navigation.
SaibotLieh
Emperor
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2009
- Messages
- 1,589
Here you go.
She uses the settler_female animation set now. The two settler .dds files don't differ from the original ones and can be replaced by them if the unit is put into the same folder as the original settlers.
avain
(key)
Here you go.
She uses the settler_female animation set now. The two settler .dds files don't differ from the original ones and can be replaced by them if the unit is put into the same folder as the original settlers.
Excellent, thank you very much SaibotLieh!
edit: here's how I updated the ancient Hungarian settlers with your new female settlers and some reskin:
Attachments
SaibotLieh
Emperor
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2009
- Messages
- 1,589
Excellent, thank you very much SaibotLieh!
edit: here's how I updated the ancient Hungarian settlers with your new female settlers and some reskin:
Awesome. I really like them.
ripple01
Emperor
I'd like to request a Polynesian Warrior and a Hebrew Slinger. We have pretty much a full Ancient/Medieval/Renaissance Polynesian set, however the Warrior has not been done. The Hebrew Slinger could be a fairly simple reskin of the peltast, I believe.
If anyone could come through with these, I'd be most grateful.
Cheers,
ripple01
If anyone could come through with these, I'd be most grateful.
Cheers,
ripple01
Glaeder
Glaeder Ethribine Wodism
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2009
- Messages
- 147
Is still noone interested to make these units for me?
Good morning to all. I post this subject to ask for the creation of several VIU (very important unit 
)
TU22 blinder:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-22
TU22M: (This unit exists on the forum but its number of triangles is not allowable (-+9000) )
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-22M
TU160: (This unit exists on the forum but it is really ugly...) (nevertheless, respect for his creator)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-160
MIRAGE IV:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dassault_Mirage_IV
MIRAGE F1:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dassault_Mirage_F1
F100 super sabre:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-100_Super_Sabre
thank you for your future creations.
)TU22 blinder:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-22
TU22M: (This unit exists on the forum but its number of triangles is not allowable (-+9000) )
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-22M
TU160: (This unit exists on the forum but it is really ugly...
) (nevertheless, respect for his creator)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-160
MIRAGE IV:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dassault_Mirage_IV
MIRAGE F1:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dassault_Mirage_F1
F100 super sabre:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-100_Super_Sabre
thank you for your future creations.
Fall From Heaven 2 has at least dragon; it's also a pretty decent game. The problem with these requests is that, in my view: they're very difficult and unlikely to get used very often in public work. So it's an awful lot of effort just to make one person happy. That means it's unlikely, in my opinion, to get done.
The Capo
godless Heathen
Time for an obligatory bump...
I'd also like to second ripple01's request (although I am going to try and work on it, I do have a very rough concept of how to make units).
Also @ Gleader; I agree with Flying Pig, the units you request will hardly get used by anybody else, and it seems to me that they would require completely new animations. Particularly for the Chinese Dragon.
I had requested this before, but I wanted to put it back out there with some more images. I would really really really appreciate it if the following units could be created for me...
This first one should be made into a Machine-gunner and an Infantry, and is the one I need the most:
So those two I really need made. These I'd just like to be made, I wrote the requested animation for each one underneath, although I'm not sure how accurate any of these are to the units I want them to be:
Grenadier/Cannonier, Rifleman/Cavalry, Musketman/Cuirassier, Infantry/MG, I don't want the guy on the right
If more pictures are required let me know, PLEASE CAN SOMEONE DO THIS!?!?
I'd also like to second ripple01's request (although I am going to try and work on it, I do have a very rough concept of how to make units).
Also @ Gleader; I agree with Flying Pig, the units you request will hardly get used by anybody else, and it seems to me that they would require completely new animations. Particularly for the Chinese Dragon.
For the top one, Mechaerik made a serbian unit with a fez; you could probably do something with that.
