What Book Are You Reading XV - The Pile Keeps Growing!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Blood on the Snow: The Killing of Olof Palme by Jan Bondeson.
The book is an overview of the killing of Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme in 1986 by an unknown murderer. Ultimately, not particularly impressed with the book. I was hoping more space would be devoted to the right-wing networks and Swedish 'deep state', but all that gets shoved into one and a half rushed chapters where the author links the murder of Palme to an effort to cover up the Bofors scandal. While the Bofors scandal cover up is a more compelling argument than blaming the Kurds or some disreputable alcoholics, Bondeson didn't spend enough time exploring the Bofors affair - and I suspect doesn't have the background necessary to do much exploring of it.
Probably would rate the book 2/5.
 
Have been some weeks trekking without good internet access first and in a beach resort later
Read in this time first and second book form Monarchies of god series by Paul Kearney, almost ended the third, I am enjoying them a lot, above all the episodes in which the "new world" issue is not present
 
Too much work this week. Not a lot of recreational reading.

The Plotters by Un-su Kim (5/5)
 
Too much work this week. Not a lot of recreational reading.

The Plotters by Un-su Kim (5/5)
Too much work? Excellent news!
 
The Sigma Protocol by Ludlum.

Allegedly the last novel written by Robert before the ghostwriters took over.
 
Ended Second Empire, 4th book from Monarchies of god series, by Paul Kearney.
All books of the series are being a 4 out of 5, however the set of books is being a 5. Enjoying them a lot

Started the 5th and last book from the series Ships from the west
 
Too much work this week. Not a lot of recreational reading.

The Plotters by Un-su Kim (5/5)
Still no reading. Only got a couple hundred pages into Jade City by Fonda Lee before the library loan expired.

What I have read of it thus far is worth 4/5, though.
 
Re-reading my still-incomplete collection of Colleen McCullough's Masters of Rome series.
I have those in my personal library. I haven't read them yet, though.

I finally finished The Entropy Effect. Most of my books haven't been unpacked yet, but I did run across a few favorite Bova novels in the Grand Tour series: Jupiter, Saturn, and Titan. The latter two are a duology, so I decided to re-read them. I'm still waiting for the final three books in the series to come down to a reasonable price on Amazon before getting them.

Amazon keeps nagging me to review the Star Trek novel I bought awhile back. I haven't read it yet, and it could be ages before I read it. Shut up, Amazon. Greg Cox is the only pro Star Trek author I'm still collecting, so I ration his books for when I want a treat.
 
Ended Monarchies of god series, maybe worst book of the series, but it closes the series properly. No loose ends. It was a while since I did not enjoy a book series so much.

Started Dan Simmons' Ilium
 
Last edited:
Yesterday I finished reading:

The Shadow of the Wind

by

Carlosa Ruiz Zafori

A thriller set in Barcelona, with occasional reference to Paris,
ranging back and forth from just before WW1 to the early 1950s.

But I was able to guess a couple of the plot lines, something I've
noticed with too perfectly eloquent books as I have got older.
 
I'm reading Spillover by David Quammen right now. It's quite an interesting book about zoonic diseases.
 
Aurora Rising by Amie Kaufman (3/5)
Illuminae by Amie Kaufman (1/5)
The Wreckage of My Presence by Casey Wilson (2/5)
One Year After by William Forstchen (1/5)
 
Book review: John Wilkes Booth

The Meaning Of His Violence

America’s Original Sin
By John Rhodehamel

(Johns Hopkins, 470 pages, $27.95)

On April 9, 1865, Gen. Robert E. Lee surrendered his Army of Northern Virginia to Gen. Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox. The Civil War—which had killed nearly 750,000 Americans—was almost over. During the night of April 11, a throng gathered outside the White House to serenade Abraham Lincoln and shouted for him to show himself. He appeared at a second-floor window. The torch-bearing crowd expected a triumphant speech matching its jubilant mood, but the president disappointed his audience. Reading from a prepared text, a dispassionate Lincoln, after honoring the men who had fought for the Union and won the war, spoke of the future: his plans to rebuild the nation, including the prospect of black voting rights. Standing in the crowd was the pro-Confederate, Lincoln-hating actor John Wilkes Booth, who declared to a friend nearby: “That means n— citizenship! Now, by God, I’ll put him through! That is the last speech he will ever make.” Booth kept his word. Four days later Lincoln was dead. His murder still haunts America down to, in Lincoln’s words, “the latest generation.” Why—and how—Booth killed Lincoln is no simple tale, as John Rhodehamel explains in “America’s Original Sin,” a fascinating and original contribution to the Lincoln bibliography. “Booth,” says Mr. Rhodehamel, “has often been dismissed as a crazy, drunken actor,” an interpretation that he rightly rejects. The assassin’s act was instead “a political murder that can be understood only in the context of the most violent period in American history.” The cornerstone of that violence, and Booth’s core motivation, was racism. “White supremacy,” Mr. Rhodehamel contends, “was the mainspring of Booth’s crime.” As the actor proclaimed: “This country was formed for the white not for the black man.”

Mr. Rhodehamel, a former archivist and co-editor of the definitive collection of Booth’s writings, offers unforgettable characters and deeply researched historical context, including: a group biography of the Booth family—patriarch and “mad tragedian” Junius Brutus Booth and sons Edwin and John Wilkes; an account of the “star” system in 19thcentury theater; character studies of Frederick Douglass and John Brown (Booth had no use for Douglass, a former slave, but inexplicably praised Brown as “a man inspired, the grandest character of the century”); a description of the sectional crisis over the extension of slavery; and a chronicle of Booth’s evolving conspiracy to kidnap Lincoln and later murder him. This encyclopedic approach, though impressive, can result in a disjointed exposition that jumps around in time and between topics, inhibiting a smooth narrative flow.

Born and raised in Maryland, John Wilkes Booth absorbed the cultural prejudices of Southern slaveholding society. Later he owed his fame and greatest successes as an actor to Southern audiences. It was natural to embrace the Southern mind-set on race and slavery and, ultimately, secession and war. When Brown’s failed 1859 raid terrified Southerners with the prospect of a slave rebellion, Booth pulled strings to tag along with a Virginia militia unit to meet Brown in prison and then watch him hang.

Booth was not a fringe character. He represented mainstream thought, as Mr. Rhodehamel shows, and any account of his racial politics is the story of 19th-century American racism writ large. Millions of Americans, South and North, shared Booth’s supremacist views. The widespread reach of antebellum racism cannot be overstated, nor can the use of militant language and violent imagery (often depicting obscene sexual fantasies of rape and racial mixing) by Southern leaders and their Democratic allies in the North. One secessionist asked: “Submit to have our wives and daughters to choose between death and gratifying the hellish lust of the negro!! Better ten thousand deaths.”

Mr. Rhodehamel resists portraying Booth as a one-dimensional cardboard villain. Charming, generous and loyal, Booth was impossibly attractive and blessed with mesmerizing black eyes. A natural-born seducer, he proved irresistible to young actresses and teenage fans. As the actress Clara Morris confessed, it was “impossible to know him and not love him.”

Booth’s Lincoln obsession intensified during the 1864 re-election campaign with a bizarre scheme to kidnap him and hold him hostage. That plot was overtaken in the spring of 1865 by cascading events that drove the actor into a frenzied, alcohol-driven tailspin: Lincoln’s second inauguration; Lee’s surrender; and an illumination of Washington to celebrate the war’s end with fireworks and flame pots that made the dome of the Capitol glow like the moon. The actor saw it all. Late that night, he wrote his final letter to his mother: “Everything was bright and splendid. More so in my eyes if it had been a display in a nobler cause.” Mr. Rhodehamel reveals how Booth’s “passionate love for the South, his support for slavery and white supremacy, his hatred for Lincoln, and his despair as inexorable defeat overtook the [Southern] cause” propelled him to Ford’s Theatre.

John Wilkes Booth wasn’t a fringe character. Any account of his racial politics is the story of 19th-century American racism writ large.


ajax-request.php



During the nationwide manhunt for him, Booth devoured newspaper accounts of the murder and was astounded that the critics gave his performance bad reviews, condemning him as a loathsome assassin who caused so much anger and sorrow. He thought he had played the hero’s part. “Our country owed all our troubles to him,” he wrote before a Union cavalry patrol shot him to death, “and God simply made me the instrument of his punishment.” Booth’s murderous act made Lincoln the hero of the story—America’s secular saint. Mr. Rhodehamel advances the argument, first made by historian Michael Burlingame, that Lincoln should properly be viewed as a martyr to civil rights.

Americans still reckon with issues of race and equal rights that remain unresolved. Long before Booth became a stage star, he proclaimed his grandest ambition: “Fame, I must have fame!” In “America’s Original Sin,” John Wilkes Booth lives on as a racist and a murderer whose evil spirit still roams the land.

Mr. Swanson, a federal commissioner on the U.S. Semiquincentennial Commission, is the author of “Manhunt: The Twelve-Day Chase for Lincoln’s Killer.”
 
Yeah, she gets unbearable. Caesar is so handsome, so manly, so virile, so smart, so noble, and acts true to the ideals of his time… Labienus is a monster for torturing Romans while Cæsar, who supervises Labienus' torturing Gauls and himself orders thousands of people mutilated ‘as a warning’, is not a monster.

Of course, that does reflect the attitude many of Caesar's compatriots had towards him, that as long as he didn't do it to them then f-all.
 
Do Not Disturb: The Story of a Political Murder and an African Regime Gone Bad by Michaela Wrong. The book is focused on the murder of former Rwandan chief of intelligence Patrick Karegeya by members of the Rwandan security services, apparently acting on order of the Rwandan President, Paul Kagame. The book looks at how Kagame and RPF government have made full use of the good will and propoganda following the Rwandan Genocide and the myth of Rwanda as a "success story" in Africa to consolidate power in a small intensely authoritarian Tutsi clique. Wrong also goes into some detail about how common the (racist) idea that we shouldn't expect anything better from African politicians is across all political stripes in America and Europe.
Good book, and Wrong is an excellent writer. Highly recommend.
 
…you've read the Wrong book. By the Wrong writer.

srsly nao
the (racist) idea that we shouldn't expect anything better from African politicians
I get the same here, e.g. with the praise for the recently-deceased Abimael Guzmán, who patriotically and popularly massacred the peasants.
 
Ended Dan Simmons' Ilium.

Masterpiece.
Don't know how to describe my feelings. Bassically I spent chapters and chapters saying, "I do not undesrtad a crap, but I can not stop reading"
Then I though, Simmons wouldn't dare to imagine this plot, then, yes he did, and finally all pieces fit in a masterpiece.

Starting The Clan of the Cave Bear by Jean M. Auel
 
Starting The Clan of the Cave Bear by Jean M. Auel

You're in for a long read then (but not nearly as long as she took to write the series!)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom