Holy crap. Are we seriously so completely meta that we use a thread discussing whether we like arguments to argue about whether we're arguing? 

Holy crap. Are we seriously so completely meta that we use a thread discussing whether we like arguments to argue about whether we're arguing?![]()
Ditto.
I voted all of the options in the poll except for the first one. Discussion on religion or politics certainly has a place here but I don't want a "highly structured environment". Moderation is fine in moderation, but if I want structure I'd better join a debating club or a more serious discussion forum, not an Off-Topic forum of a gaming site.
A : why do you say that (that he'd be banned)?I came for smart people discussing smart things intelligently.
I stay for the community. The community only works if other people in the community stay for the community, which means we still have to have good posts, good threads, and a good culture. I think it is very telling that if Rambuchan were to start posting today, he'd be banned quickly rather than be a celebrated poster.
It's kind of funny that many of the replies so far don't actually answer the thread question ("What do you want out of OT?"). Saying you're "here for the community" is nice, but what does that actually mean within the context of determining what the community desires out of this forum?
Eh, don't you think that why people come here tells you a lot about what people want out of OT? Presumably, if you come here for certain reasons, you wouldn't want those reasons to vanish.