What does a MAGA hat stand for?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Yes, they would. Exploitative, vulture-like, outsourcing, globalized multi-national corporation executives and PR speakers do it ALL THE TIME! And a notable number of them are tied to racist groups, causes, lobby interests, and "secret societies and gentleman's clubs."

After publishing false statistics about their criminality*? After exclaiming over and over that Kaepernick was an SOB**?

Dude, Trump also bragged (falsely) about the size of his electoral college victory (months after he'd been corrected, btw). The fact that he'll try to take credit for something doesn't mean much. He'll say anything that he thinks might make him look good. He pimped Trump University, for goodness sake.

*He didn't have to do this. He chose to.
**He didn't have to do this. He chose to.

I'm sure the KKK was overjoyed with the news
 
His party doesn't matter, this is about why people wear a hat in support of him. Now would a racist brag about freeing black people and their better job prospects?

That's not just racism it's literally plantation racism
 
Well, letting a racist sheriff who (illegally) racially profiles out of jail is not NOT racist.

I'm sure the KKK was overjoyed with the news
Meh, you just think that spouting piles of racist things doesn't mean you're racist.

Again, no one forced him to do the things that I've highlighted. He did them.
 
cuz letting black people out of jail is like slavery

You have a serious misconception on what it requires to be racist @Berzerker. I've seen people raise their black grandkids and be racist. Love and racism aren't even mutually exclusive. Not that Trump loves african americans, his long business and political history indicates he is not a fan.
 
I work hard, I pay taxes, I play by the rules. Where are my interests represented in Washington D.C.?

Why can they live off federal grants and then tell me I need to learn to code?

Why can they live in gated communities and tell me I need refugees in my neighborhood?

Why can they fly to Zurich and Johannesburg and Dubai and eat lobster and caviar and then tell me I can’t drive my car or eat my hamburger or buy my lightbulbs because I need to save the environment?

It’s representative of the frustrations of a many good American people—and they’re totally legitimate.
 
Expecting and demanding gratitude for being thrown small pittances is a plantation mindset
Pretty sure that's been a Democratic Party platform since LBJ
 
Pretty sure that's been a Democratic Party platform since LBJ

The U.S. needs more viable parties. The two dominant ones have failed utterly at governance, cheated and lied to their own people CONSTANTLY, broken their own laws ALL THE TIME, and never been punished legally for it, and, because the electoral system is so rigged and corrupt, they sit back smugly and watch as the American voters, because they have no real choice otherwise, crawl back to the ballot box and BEG one or the other of these two parties for another term of abuse, like beaten down domestic abuse victims. Yes, the U.S. NEEDS more viable political parties, so these two packs of sleezebags can both be told to screw off in the SAME ELECTION.
 
I work hard, I pay taxes, I play by the rules. Where are my interests represented in Washington D.C.?

Why can they live off federal grants and then tell me I need to learn to code?

Why can they live in gated communities and tell me I need refugees in my neighborhood?

Why can they fly to Zurich and Johannesburg and Dubai and eat lobster and caviar and then tell me I can’t drive my car or eat my hamburger or buy my lightbulbs because I need to save the environment?

It’s representative of the frustrations of a many good American people—and they’re totally legitimate.

This seems like a pretty odd conception of the elected US political cohort tbh (assuming that's who "they" is here)
 
This is generally what's known as "projection", I believe.

The most aggregious, monstrous, corrupt, and horrible of American government policies since the end of WW2 have been the ones with "bipartisan political agreement," that are never Presidential election issues, except for Third Party and Independent candidates, and Primary candidates who are labelled as "extreme outliers," like Dennis Kucinich, Ron Paul, and Bernie Sanders.
 
It’s not just elected officials, it’s “woke” big business executives, Hollywood stars, TV talking heads, and a detestable leech class of lobbyists and public policy wanks.

"Woke," sounds like yet another one of those annoying non-terms that have cropped up in the pop zeitgeist that stain Internet text and buzz over video and audio files, but are complete and utter worthless garbage words the world could do without, and would be much better off, and more erudite sounding, without.
 
"Woke," sounds like yet another one of those annoying non-terms that have cropped up in the pop zeitgeist that stain Internet text and buzz over video and audio files, but are complete and utter worthless garbage words the world could do without, and would be much better off, and more erudite sounding, without.
I thought it was an appropriate choice for the sake of brevity.
 
I thought it was an appropriate choice for the sake of brevity.

I, myself, have no problem with long-windedness, as you would quickly see going over by posts on this site. I like to try and get my point across. And, even then, some posters here still misunderstand what I'm saying (deliberately, in a number of cases, I've come to believe - but that's another story). :P
 
This seems like a pretty odd conception of the elected US political cohort tbh (assuming that's who "they" is here)

About as odd as an Australian who continually acts like an expert on American politics, society, and culture...
 
About as odd as an Australian who continually acts like an expert on American politics, society, and culture...

It's not like the United States engines of media do much, if anyone at all, or keep knowledge or understanding of American politics, society, and culture secret, mysticized, oblique, exclusive, privileged, or inscrutable. In fact, it's broadcast "loud" for the world in as clear a form as any American gets it. It's often even hard to avoid for people of most other countries.
 
So, do you think it is an extreme proposition to say that someone's place of birth should not determine their treatment under the law?
Replace place of birth by "nationality status" and yes, it's a very extreme proposition. In virtually every single country on Earth, people have different rights depending on their nationality. And the vast majority of voters support this, and anyway we don't have a way to do it differently from an economic POV.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom