I wouldn't be exactly optimistic. I expect they'll milk it out for every dollar it's worth.
I expect it to be a good polished game, but I'm skeptical if they can capture the magic of the original trilogy.
I would be happy if they stayed far away from the Reapers though. Not to rag on the ending of the trilogy but it was kind of lame. I just hope they start over and don't try and tie it in wit the old games.
Reapers should have won. That would have been a great ending.
I would dispute that. I think the quality of writing isn't really that different. The overall plots for both games fall kind of flat, and each has moments with terrible writing (Samara's loyalty mission in ME2 is cringeworthy) and moments with great writing (priority: tuchanka). The first game probably has the worst writing, and it's still pretty good.There's a very noticeable drop in the quality of the writing between ME2 and 3.
What do you mean?And Dragon Age: Inquisition -while not a bad game- is the final proof that Bioware's new niche is RPGs for people who don't like RPGs, but I like RPGs.
Didn't figure you for a genre purist.And Dragon Age: Inquisition -while not a bad game- is the final proof that Bioware's new niche is RPGs for people who don't like RPGs, but I like RPGs.
Witcher 3 was very good but the praise is overblown (Hearts of Stone was fantastic though). And while I agree it's better than Inquisition, they're pretty different games, and Inquisition is still good.Dragon Age 3 was pretty bland.
And after Witcher 3, well, the bar is in the stratosphere for RPGs now. Hopefully this leads to better things from the likes of Bioware or Bethesda (hahahaa).
What do you mean?
I don't think I'm much of a purist, I'm OK with some streamlining, but in my opinion they went too far. I felt more like a Mass Effect/Skyrim hybrid than what would have expected from a Dragon Age game.Didn't figure you for a genre purist.
I thought Vega was fine, but Kai Leng is pretty terrible, and I have mixed feelings on EDI. ME3's writing does have its low points, but so do the other games.ME 3 had some terrible character design (Vega, Kai Leng) and some of the dialohue was facepalm worthy. And I hated where they went with EDI.
First, I would not call it action combat, though even if it was I don't see how that makes it not an RPG. I think you're using a pretty narrow definition of RPG. What would you consider good examples?The action/mmo style combat and the limited character customization where we don't need to worry our pretty little heads about attributes or non-combat skills any more would be my biggest complaints.
You would like r/gamingcirclejerk.The two things that put me off of the Witcher games are the aforementioned circlejerk and the fact that you're locked into playing a character that is basically just a less interesting version of Caine. Not my thing. They're very pretty games, though.