Which book are you reading now? Volume XIV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Continuing reading Goedel-Escher-Bach. It is a very nice work, apparently targeted primarily at very young people (who are interested in math), but can be read by anyone with a general interest. (That said, it is 800 pages long)
It surely does present some notions in a more elegant or pleasant way, linking them to things in art which you can pick up with general thought (instead of mathematical or formal logic). You don't really want to read math articles on recursively enumerable sets if you aren't already into that.
 
I have just started Flowers of Algernon (at Kyriakos's recommendation). I am no good at english literature, but I think he is using the protagonist writing in phonetic spelling rather than "correct" spelling as a label for him being a "******** adult" (to use the books language). The thing is, it is how I would write if it was not for the spelling tyrants*, and if I had to produce a document with only a pen and paper I am pretty sure I would not be able to do as well.
Spoiler * :
Shakespeare is supposed to be good at writing, and he could not even spell his name the same way twice. Letters are supposed to represent sounds, so where did this "only a certain set of letters is the right way to represent a sound" come from? Bloody spelling tyrants.
 
I have just started Flowers of Algernon (at Kyriakos's recommendation). I am no good at english literature, but I think he is using the protagonist writing in phonetic spelling rather than "correct" spelling as a label for him being a "******** adult" (to use the books language). The thing is, it is how I would write if it was not for the spelling tyrants*, and if I had to produce a document with only a pen and paper I am pretty sure I would not be able to do as well.
Spoiler * :
Shakespeare is supposed to be good at writing, and he could not even spell his name the same way twice. Letters are supposed to represent sounds, so where did this "only a certain set of letters is the right way to represent a sound" come from? Bloody spelling tyrants.

Charlie wants to be a genass.
 
where did this "only a certain set of letters is the right way to represent a sound" come from?
Actually, English seriously needs spelling reform because it's arguably worse than French in a few respects (in fact, the problem is compounded by the fact that any competent speaker of English is actually speaking French but not all the way*) and it's just a mental mixture one has to deal with all the time.


*French words underlined, Latin words bolded, btw.
 
The Nine Emotional Lives of Cats. So far... yes, they have emotions. Only someone who hates cats would say otherwise.
 
Ended Brandon Sanderson's Rhythm of war, stormlight archives #4 the book is ok,but it is tedious:
Spoiler :

I considered worthlessall Venli's flashbacks
On the other hand, I think that Sanderson has written a book in which he has tryed to show how his magical world has a coherence, and has introduced hundred of pages of Navani arguing with Rabeniel, I wanted a novel not an essay
I think I am done with this saga


Starting Los asesinos del emperador -The Emperor's Assassins - by Santiago Posteguillo, a historical novel about Trajan
 
The Nine Emotional Lives of Cats. So far... yes, they have emotions. Only someone who hates cats would say otherwise.

I remember watching a foxhunter on TV arguing it wasn't cruel because the fox wasn't intelligent and therefore couldn't feel emotions which is nonsense.
Things like fear and anger are instinctive.
Arguably it would be less cruel to hunt humans because they can rationalise things and think "actually I have a pretty good chance of surviving this".
 
I remember watching a foxhunter on TV arguing it wasn't cruel because the fox wasn't intelligent and therefore couldn't feel emotions which is nonsense.
Things like fear and anger are instinctive.
Arguably it would be less cruel to hunt humans because they can rationalise things and think "actually I have a pretty good chance of surviving this".
My own (unscientifically proven, just-makes-sense) take on this is that all mammals feel emotions, even if only the basics of pleasure or fear/anger. Some mammals feel grief strong enough to mourn members of different species when they die (ie. cats and dogs in the same household mourning the other when they die, or elephants mourning humans they've come to know).

It's well-known that some dogs and cats can suffer from anxiety if their humans are absent for extended periods of time. Two of my cats were like that with me - Lightning when I spent 5 weeks in the hospital 20 years ago (she actually thought I'd died, based on her previous experience regarding other family members who died, whether human, feline, or canine); when I returned home she stared at me for a bit, then ran and hid. No, she didn't think I was a stranger; it was like she thought she was seeing a ghost. It took hours for her to come down and come over to me, like "you're really here?". She made sure to always stay near me after that, even the night she died.

And Maddy, when I spent two weeks in the hospital a couple of years ago... my housekeeping helper came over to feed her, clean the litterbox, and talk to her, but of course she couldn't stay long and it wasn't the same. Maddy sees her as the human who pushes the Big Loud Scary Thing around the apartment (the vacuum cleaner) and she has two Yorkshire terriers so she has their scent on her. When I got back, Maddy talked to me almost nonstop for half an hour, informing me that she wasn't happy I'd been gone so long, and that I was to never leave her again. Even when I just went to the lobby for the mail and came back, she'd be at the door, mewing at me, unhappy that I'd left. She still does this sometimes. She stuck to me like glue for the first several months after I got back from the hospital. She's let up some on that now, but still spends a lot of the day in the same room, and would even come in the bathroom if I allowed that (I don't; I've told her that I give her as much privacy as I can with her litterbox, and expect the same in return).

BTW, don't anyone accuse me of anthropomorphizing; I know my cats a hell of a lot better than you do.
 
The Cultural Revolution: A People's History, Frank Dikotter.
 
The Nine Emotional Lives of Cats. So far... yes, they have emotions. Only someone who hates cats would say otherwise.
I wasn't aware they had any emotions beyond loathing us for being able to operate the can opener, and sucking up to us because we can operate the can opener.
 
I wasn't aware they had any emotions beyond loathing us for being able to operate the can opener, and sucking up to us because we can operate the can opener.
Maddy's canned cat food has the same opening mechanism that pop cans have. No can opener is required. She still needs me to open it, though.

Chapter 1 of the book is about narcissism.
 
Reading Heart of Darkness.
Interesting that Apocalypse Now does have some reasonable ties to it (I knew it was inspired from that, but expected less).
Also, in retrospect, pretty shameful that Brando didn't bother to read the book.
 
Last edited:
Several of the books from the 1632 series. Some new to me, some to remind me where I left off, because the whole series got so large that it's next to impossible to follow it all.
 
I'm still making my way through The Nine Emotional Lives of Cats. Have gone through Narcissism, Love, and Contentment, and am now working on Attachment.

Some of what the author says is out to lunch. I might post a review in the Cats & Kittens thread when I'm done.
 
"Moon Rainbow" by Sergey Pavlov.
Novel about exploration of far Solar System, written in 1978-1983.
Explorers encounter strange events and some of them acquire unusual biological and sensory properties. The International Space Security Control investigates the accidents and survivors, searching for signs of possible disease and threat to the Earth.
 
Now finished reading the Heart of Darkness.

I am not sure why this book is supposed to be memorable. It is a simple enough story; maybe people at the time didn't imagine what was happening in the Kongo, although they wouldn't learn of it by reading this book either. I was also (falsely) lead to believe it had some specific message about the Kongo afair.
Kurtz also wasn't that frightening a figure. The book had a plot twist (which would fail if you had seen Apocalypse Now anyway, since that doesn't contain any such thing regarding Kurtz), so maybe it'd make a greater impression to its original audience.
 
Last night I finished reading the english translation of:

My Name is Red

by

Orhan Pamuk

It is a brilliant novel about intrigue and murder amongst miniaturists (artists)
in Instanbul during the rule of Sultan Murat III in the sixteenth century.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom