That's what it sure sounded like - if you weren't talking about a woman in particular being needed to effect this supposedly necessary change, why did you say that "America needs a woman's touch"?That's fine, I'm not attacking every person that thinks Hillary won't be good for America. No one's perfect and Hillary is no exception.
I just thought I'd clarify my position on change and show that that statement wasn't just about a woman versus a man.
You're a hooker?!Somebody call my name?![]()
But with all the candidates talking "change," they'd actually have to show it'd be a good change. Change for change's sake may not be the best answer.

But seriously, there are only a few candidates who I think would be substantially different, and only one vastly so. (Ron Paul is the one who I think would make the most changes. I don't necessarily agree with a lot of them, though)