Would you ever experiment with your sexuality?

[Captain2]

Actually, to the gays who said earlier that we're missing out- what can't a straight couple do that gay can?

High five after

 

[Immortal Ace]

Actually, to the gays who said earlier that we're missing out- what can't a straight couple do that gay can?

The only difference I can think of comes to men. The prostate massage with an actual penis and not plastic like a sex toy?

Other than that, there is nothing that a straight couple can't do that a gay couple can.

 

[Bugfatty300]

Does massaging the prostate actually causes pleasure or an orgasm? Because I hear it's actually a very uncomfortable experience.

 

[Immortal Ace]

Does massaging the prostate actually causes pleasure or an orgasm? Because I hear it's actually a very uncomfortable experience.

I wouldn't have any idea.

If you want to find out...you have fingers.

 

[downtown]

First, given the direction we've taken, the "problems with oral" tag needs to be added. Second, I have no doubt that you're correct. Lots of things that may be incredibly pleasurable are also immoral, like hard drug usage. Not that getting head is equivalent to shooting up, but it was the first analogy that came to my head.)

Why would oral sex be immoral if you were married?

 

[Abaddon]

Why would anything?

 

[Bugfatty300]

I wouldn't have any idea.

If you want to find out...you have fingers.

Yeah but it's hard to get em in the right spot.

 

[Immortal Ace]

Why would anything?

Their beliefs.

Don't argue anyone on religion. It'll get you no where and you'll both be ashamed.

 

[Terxpahseyton]

Actually, to the gays who said earlier that we're missing out- what can't a straight couple do that gay can?

Well it could be argued that a greater understanding of the sexual desires of the own gender holds some advantages for same-sex-sex.

Also I picked up somewhere that the prostate had a significantly greater ability to be stimulated than the glans does.

 

[Abaddon]

Well it could be argued that a greater understanding of the sexual desires of the own gender holds some advantages for same-sex-sex.

Also I picked up somewhere that the prostate had a significantly greater ability to be stimulated than the glans does.

It could also be argued that the human body is designed for heterosexual sex, not homosexual...and that we are deeply programmed to perform well, or we would have died out generations ago!

 

[Abaddon]

Their beliefs.

Don't argue anyone on religion. It'll get you no where and you'll both be ashamed.

Religion teaches shame, not nature. They may be shameful, but I will not.

 

[_random_]

Why would oral sex be immoral if you were married?

I see sinful desires as misexpressions of good desires. Sexual lust is rooted in the good desire to be fruitful and multiply. Oral sex misses out on the intent entirely, so it's morally on the same level as contraception. On your mark. Get set. TROLL!

 

[Terxpahseyton]

It could also be argued that the human body is designed for heterosexual sex, not homosexual...and that we are deeply programmed to perform well, or we would have died out generations ago!

Programmed to reproduce / ability to increase sexual pleasure

 

[Abaddon]

Those who are good at sex, will have more sex...

 

[Terxpahseyton]

Not back in time when evolution actually mattered.

 

[Mango Elephant]

Actually, to the gays who said earlier that we're missing out- what can't a straight couple do that gay can?

The only thing I can think of is that when gays have orgies they're attracted to everyone there, not just half the people. Same with threesomes (occasionally).

And several straight people can't talk about sexual things the same way several gay people can.

Yeah but it's hard to get em in the right spot.

You know, you don't even have to finger yourself to feel the prostate.

 

[Mustakrakish]

Absolutely NOT!!!! I'm interested in chicks! Not ding dongs!

Link to video.

 

[LucyDuke]

Maybe, Lucy, people are so programmed with what's supposed to be "right/normal" that they repress their true sexuality. I still find it hard to believe that more than a tiny minority (1% or less) all of a sudden wake up & realize they've been living a lie & start dating a different sex.

I'm not suggesting that the women I described were repressing themselves or didn't know what they wanted or whatever. I'm suggesting that they just plain changed. I think it's entirely possible that it's no more than 1% of any given population. Of course what you describe is possible too, but it's not what I was trying to explain.

Not crucially, but to a point I think yes. One's point of view rarely exists disjointed form one's own experiences. Of course you are free to not answer.

No, I'm not a lesbian. I don't make a secret, I'm bisexual, but what he said was obnoxious no matter who you are. I certainly don't pursue women because I'm unattractive to men, nor do I pursue women that are unattractive to men. Neither do the vast majority of lesbians.

Real men make their own rules.

 

[Bluemofia]

Completely not interested in men.

 

[civver_764]

I see sinful desires as misexpressions of good desires. Sexual lust is rooted in the good desire to be fruitful and multiply. Oral sex misses out on the intent entirely, so it's morally on the same level as contraception. On your mark. Get set. TROLL!

This is my number one problem with Christian morality. Stuff that feels good is immoral, WTH?!