2012 NBA Playoffs

This is because you weren't around for Russell-Chamberlain or Erving - Bird. Then
it was a serious rivalry.
I know plenty about basketball history. That was then, this is now. Nobody but the old-time Celtics fans really think of the Sixers like that anymore.

And, like Azale said, Russell-Wilt wasn't a rivalry. Rivalries have to be two-sided, and Chamberlain's teams got annihilated by Russell's every time except once.
 
you're picking nits as usual.

addit: if you took a second to read my original post, you'd have seen that i noted that it was old school. and if you're a historian of the game like you claim to be, you'd be familiar with the battles. who cares if they were 30 years ago?
 
"lovin' this old-school rivalry" implies that it was a rivalry Back in the Day that has either endured or been reignited by modern events, i.e. it is a rivalry now just as it was a rivalry then. Since that's what every single other person who posted about it in this thread thought you meant, I think it's a pretty reasonable thing for me to assume.

If that wasn't what you wanted to say, perhaps you should get better at that English language thing so as to better communicate those ideas in your head.
 
garnett called sixers fans fair-weather :lol: and he's sort of right. the sixers have a sort of apathetic fanbase and only show up in force when they're winning or for big opponents. i can't really put my finger on it personally, but garnett surely isn't wrong when he says that.

now, philly is a good hoops city, always has been imo. the Big 5 college teams are popular and there are some old gyms in town that are still used. but fans just don't back the sixers during the lean times (which have been rather plentiful over the last decade or two). take the eagles and flyers as another example. they always sell out (or almost always), even during down times. phillies? rollins was absolutely right when he said the same thing back in 2008. phillies fans are the ficklest of the bunch imho. the bandwagon has swelled to unrecognizable proportions over the least several years. the one great thing this has produced, for MLB teams with no hard cap restrictions, is a huge bump to payroll.

anyhow, yes, sixers fans are fair-weathered :cool:
 
Sucks that all we an talk about is how dirty this series has been and the LeBron going supernova is going to get ignored.

Pittman getting multiple games, maybe gone for the remaineder of the playoffs (not that it matters, if they really wanted to punish the Heat the league should force them to play him 48 minutes for the next 3 games), Haslem and Hansbrough will probably get fined but I doubt they miss any games.
 
Haslem needs to get a few... you can at least try for the ball.
 
So, Miami is a team of cheep shot artists now?

That crap may back-fire on them... and quick. Haslem said afterwards that 'he went for the ball' :rolleyes: .

If he meant that thing on Hansboro right between/above his shoulders... yeah.

The elbow thrown is just :mad: ... a no-playing throw-away player that the Heat could afford to lose the rest of the series. No class.
 
Haslem's Foul was fine. That was a case of "you hit my guy, I'll hit yours". Both him and Hansborough should be fined, but not suspended. Pittman needs to be suspended for the rest of the playoffs.
 
Haslem has to at least make an effort for the ball, or make it look as if he was making an effort. He did not.
 
Its similar to baseball where if a pitcher hits your guy with a pitch and you hit him with a pitch. 1 game wouldn't be excessive though.

Either way, I think Heat close in 6.
 
It's also stupid in baseball. Hansbrough was going for ball, he is Psycho T that's what he does. Haslem was being a punk.
 
Back
Top Bottom