Altered Maps XIV: Cartographical Consistency

Specifically an American military base in Panama, not Panama per se. If he had won I'm sure a few people would've raised a ruckus about whether he would've qualified to be President because of this (though *probably* not as much as the Obama birther movement) but I think most legal and academic experts agreed that McCain qualified for the Presidency.

wasn't it the american panama canal zone?
 
wasn't it the american panama canal zone?

Wikipedia sez:

John McCain was born on August 29, 1936, at Coco Solo Naval Air Station in the Panama Canal Zone, to naval officer John S. McCain Jr. (1911–1981) and Roberta (Wright) McCain (born 1912). He has a younger brother named Joe and an elder sister named Sandy. At that time, the Panama Canal was under U.S. control.

So I guess we're both right?
 
It certainly doesn't get more american than a naval air station in the Panama canal zone
 
standard_vikingtidKart.png


I feel ever so slightly like Domen
 
It might be that by the time the normans started going there they weren't really under Denmark anymore.

EDIT: Oh and Domen, compare this map with a modern one to see what Sweden has conquered from Norway
 
I'd presume "settlements".
 
You're correct

Also, green arrows are "viking attacks", and red lines are "the vikings' trade routes"
 
Interesting seeing the changes over the years. It seems the current patterns emerged from the 90s. Only 90s kids remember

Man, elections in the beginning of USA were plain weird.

To be fair there wasn't really a lot of historical precedent for the system
 
Democratic-Republican. If they only stuck together.

From what I remember the parties flipped at one point too. The Republicans became the Democrats and vice versa.

And now they're pretty much the same. :p But maybe an American can correct me, if I got the above wrong. I'm pretty sure something like that happened.
 
From what I remember the parties flipped at one point too. The Republicans became the Democrats and vice versa.

And now they're pretty much the same. :p But maybe an American can correct me, if I got the above wrong. I'm pretty sure something like that happened.

Both parties originally had both conservative and liberal wings, and while they weren't the "same" as sometimes their bases of support varied from time to time, there were some common threads - for instance folks from the Confederate Deep South were generally Democrats before Nixon and the GOP adopted the southern strategy. In fact even nowadays you can see remnants of these conservative Dems in local politics, and even in a more likited extent in national politics - Gore's father, Gore Sr, was a prominent conservative democrat. Meanwhile, th GOPs liberal/moderate wing was based mainly in the northeast, and were nicknamed Rockefeller Republicans since Nelson Rockefeller was one of their most prominent members. It ultimately looks like a flip now but it's more that historically they just had different interests and bases of support.

So I wouldn't say they've flipped so much as they both just chose to lurch to different sides. In American terms, of course. I suppose for all you Euro-Canadians the American parties look the same, but there are differences.
 
Back
Top Bottom