silver 2039
Deity
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
- Messages
- 16,208
That sounds ********. I decalre JIHAD on that idea. May it drown in feces and blood.
Europe will most likely enter the Renaissance earlier, led by Italy as in OTL, but due to the lack of massive serfdom dieoffs, some feudal/chivalric systems could remain viable, even with the faster urbanization.
there will be a Greco-Veneto-Genoan scramble for ports in the Holy Land and Egypt.
Brandenburgers in India
especially if the Catholic Church manages to call a new crusade
Well, the entirety of Asia has been depopulated, so we can assume that a variety of late 14th century European adventurers attempting to carve out small lordships can do so, and North Germans would be the most likely, given population pressures and perhaps in response to consolidative efforts from the HRE.
The Byzantine Empire was indeed ruined, but they're the most strategically placed to liberate the Hellespont, and would probably (with Genoan assistance) be attempting to set up trade routes to get at those Indian natural resources, before the other powers mobilize to launch naval expeditions.
papal-endorsed crusaders
national armies
brigands
What the hell does the Pope want with India when there are heretics and schismatics at every corner in Europe?
Medieval national armies, hur hur hur. What monarch would be stupid enough to send an actual army to invade an empty, barren, far-away land when he has neighbours who are just waiting for the opportunity to stab him in the back? In any case, don't those neighbours seem like a far better target?
Having said that, there might also be some Jews, gypsies, heretics and other outcasts fleeing to the barren lands. Conflict with those people, especially the heretics, sounds like it could eventually stimulate mainstream Christian expansion, until the crusaders over-reach themselves and the outcasts become a sufficient force in their own right.
Who else is going to save them from the Turkish menace as the Ottomans spill into central Europe? Yeah, if Vienna holds anyway then Louis sure as hell won't get elected, but it's been posited many, many times that if the Ottomans had seized Vienna then Louis would have simply switched his attention from the silly Reunion policy and intervened to "save" Germany.das said:No way. Can you imagine the Electors ever voting for someone this much more powerful than themselves?
Well if they aren't going to go for Louis or his Prusso-Polish buddies then yeah, that pretty much goes without saying.das said:Actually, who they might elect to counter Louis is a certain William from a country well-known for its opposition to France.![]()
Exactly.das said:Heh. What proper althistory isn't?
Also, before the war it hasn't really had enough time to diverge into something reasonably different. Most of the time, we take althists more than just ten years into the future (the notable exception being the excellent PoD-of-the-Day involving Cavaignac's 1848 France), because if we're going to play something that similar to the real world we might as well do a historical NES without the "alt". Besides, the whole in-character debate aside, I'm pretty sure we wouldn't get a realistic result if NESers were charged with playing their countries to develop the TL that early.das said:We will just have to go with one of the variants. I agree that it would be better to start either before or after the war; but after the war appears as distinctly more fun to me, because otherwise it's just a plain old 17th century NES (not that it's a bad thing, we need one, indeed we need many, but why bother with making some minor changes for it?).
Frankfurt is the official capital; Berlin is the one where things are actually run.Germany (or some variant of it) is unified already and it has two capitals...
Yes, that is true. Tuscany, Parma, and Modena have been added to the Habsburg empire in addition to Lombardy and Venetia. In OTL at this point they were under Habsburg rulers but now they are all under Vienna's formal control.Azale said:Austria also has alot more Italian land than in OTL I think too.
Not a royal marriage; that would be sort of silly with the elective kingship that Poland had.Azale said:EDIT: WHOAH, royal marriage between Poland & Russia? Or has Poland always been Russia...
This must be one of those Poland PoD's that das loves so much.
Your guess is wrong!
Do I know too much already to guess, Dachs?
Knee-jerk reaction?I want stats for that. I wanna mod that one day.
What d'you mean by that?Luckymoose said:Oh and my guess would be something to "not" do with Napoleon?
What Confederacy of the Rhine? I know of no such organization.The Confederacy of the Rhine survived or something?
If that happened then why is Belgium missing a goodly chunk of her eastern territory?Belgium annexed all of Europe only to release them instantly as vassals?![]()
If that happened then why is Belgium missing a goodly chunk of her eastern territory?