Thanks for the comments, and for the clearing up of those points, das.
Dachspmg: nice althist, finally had the opportunity to read it, the premise seems a bit familiar though.

Also, glad to see Abraha in an althist. Am quite curious to see how will things work out in Arabia in the short-term.
It should be familiar, but I had an outline for something sort of like what you had already anyway. Abraha will be...fun.
das said:
I realise that this is a somewhat dubious idea, to say the least, but mightn't he have wanted to assist the Eastern Romans in their war? You know, to win Justinian's favour and placate his nobles with warfare? That option would also let the Frankish worries sleep, and would carry far less genuine risk - even if the Persian campaign is a disaster, the Ostrogoths still won't lose much from it. At the least he could've sent an expeditionary force. Greater contacts with the Middle East might've led to some interesting consequences, religion, tactics and technology-wise.
What you had him do instead works too, though.
I guess it would have been conceivable, at least, but the sheer logistics would have been frightening to say the least. Besides, the Frankish intervention has entertaining consequences in Installment 2 (going up in less than a week, hopefully very much less if I can work on Martin Luther King Jr. Day). That's really not a viable reason to have something occur in a TL, I know, but there is a little bit of history behind it (what with the somewhat revanchist Visigoths, and the collapse of Burgundy to the Franks just right then) and it is a more convenient target.
It seems kinda weird that Persia wouldn't disintegrate completely in the wake of losing Ctesiphon itself. First off, the Sassanid power base is totally gutted, and I don't see why the nobles/still restless Hunnic migrants wouldn't simply cease to recognize such a disasterously unsuccessful Shah. At the least, fractured successor states, some ethnically Hunnic, would be a cool idea, perhaps leaving a power vacuum for opportunistic Arabs.
As of immediately after the peace treaty, the Sassanid state officially exists. However, the 550s do make things decidedly interesting in Persia as well as in Italy, especially since the dehgans are proportionally much more powerful than the Ostrogothic Arian nobles. Meanwhile, we have Hephthalites able to intervene, and the Avar Empire collapsing off to the northeast a ways...Persia has been extremely interesting to write about so far.
Thlayli said:
Arabia seems nice...we'll probably have an Axumite disturbance in the Red Sea prevent any type of Islamic formation, a la an earlier Staznes that had an equally hegemonic Eastern Rome. The thought of Arian or Coptic Arabs later making inroads into Mesopotamia and/or Persia is equally interesting.
Arian Arabs? Axum is sort of on the money ish. Without giving away too much about what happens later, I will say that through Abraha and his successors, Axum does enter about a century and a half of Golden Age starting now.
Thlayli said:
This also bodes well for a northwestern centralization of the Frankish cultural influence...Normandy and Ile de France will probably look more German than anything else at this rate.
The loss of Burgundy, given the Ostrogothic/Western Roman civil war, is probably going to be extremely temporary. Just a thought.
Thlayli said:
That would, of course, extend the oncoming Magyar influences further into East Francia than *some* might like, but it'll be interesting anyway. Pagan Saxony is like to persist if anyone lets it.
The Magyars would have to go through Ostrogothic/Western Roman Pannonia in order to get there. That in itself would be difficult enough; I don't see the Magyars being able to maintain their OTL conquering lifestyle without the plains of the Alföld. And the civil war will have an interesting effect on the Lombards, too, and they are also in the way...stay tuned, anyway.
It's a huge blow, but there are western Persian cities to fall back upon in such an event. It probably won't fall as there is little in the way of a viable alternative; the Huns are way too weak at the moment, having just been thoroughly thrashed.
They
are extremely weak, but Khosrau will be unable to attack them as he did in OTL (although I guess the Gokturks did have a greater influence on the Huns' fall). Too, there are a few Persian cities to fall back on in the Zagros, but Persia itself will have a vastly smaller population base to work from, and since, unlike the Parthians (when they lost Mesopotamia to Trajan), a large chunk of the Sassanid power base is in Mesopotamia itself...
das said:
Maybe, maybe not. An option that does interest me is the Ghassanids trying to unite Arabia as Roman vassals and with Roman assistance (Axum-Schmaxum, if Justinian looks east he might as well grab all those nice trade routes for himself).
Justinian is worried more about other things in a different cardinal direction right now, and will soon die, leaving the throne to Justin II. Bwahahaha...but the Ghassanids, since the Lakhmids have virtually collapsed, will have a good deal of fun in Arabia.