warpus
Sommerswerd asked me to change this
It's not really signing anybody up for anything. Somebody who was baptized by proxy doesn't go on church membership rolls. It wouldn't say anywhere that they were/are a Mormon. The ordinance would be to give them a choice....remember that throughout the course of human history, very few people had a "choice" to be Christians at all, let alone Mormons.
Maybe I shouldn't have used that as an example because I disagree with this on an intellectual level.
You just don't do that sort of thing to someone unless you have their permission. Isn't that some sort of an American ideal, too? You don't infringe someone's liberty?
Ask them first, and if they say no, you don't do it. If they agree, go ahead. Don't you agree that this is a very sensible and civilized (and even American) way to go about living your life?
Besides, what if God ends up sending all Mormons to hell? What if you guys are wrong? What if you are condemning all those souls to hell? It works either way.
Your analogy doesn't really work, since digging up a dead mormon and putting cream cheese all over his body is illegal, and obviously more harmful than doing somebody's family tree work for them and using their name.
Yeah, bad example. Think of something legal yet equally offensive.