So what are you offering them now?
the same thing slaves should have gotten back then, freedom... with no strings attached
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Baptiste_Henri_Lacordaire#QuotesHenri-Dominique Lacordaire said:Between the strong and the weak, between the rich and the poor, between the lord and the slave, it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free.
they wanted freedom, not everyone wants to farm
Well, the slaves were oppressed because the law failed to outlaw slavery. I.e. it gave the freedom to oppress.slaves were oppressed by freedom and not the law that empowered their owners?
Lincoln's offer was a death sentence for western Indians
which would have opened three million acres of unoccupied public land in Florida, Mississippi, and Arkansas for homesteading
Southern land owners regained control over almost all of the land they had claimed before the war. The national dialogue about land ownership as a key to success for freedpeople gave way (in the sphere of white politics and media) to the implementation of a plantation wage system
Free blacks in the South widely believed that all land would be redistributed to those who had worked on it. They also felt strongly that they had a right to own this land.[3][161] Many expected this event to occur by Christmas 1865 or New Year's 1866.[162][163][164] Although the freedpeople formed this belief in response to the policies of the Freedmen's Bureau and Circular #1
Many blacks who had settled on property surrounding Hampton were forced to leave by various means
By the 1870s, blacks had abandoned hope of federal land redistribution, but many still saw "forty acres and a mule" as the key to freedom
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forty_acres_and_a_mule
So... monetary reparations and/or land/real estate grants, coupled with lifelong tax exemptions? Or just more words, words, words?the same thing slaves should have gotten back then, freedom... with no strings attached
And with that comment you've provided an exceptionally timely and strikingly on-the-nose example of this:The Clown Car thread is really not the place to argue 150-year-old politics.
In other words "racism was 150 years ago... so stop talking about it in a current events thread....""we already Ctrl+Z'd racism, stop talking about it".
slaves were oppressed by freedom and not the law that empowered their owners?
freedom - the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint.
slavery is a restraint
And with that comment you've provided an exceptionally timely and strikingly on-the-nose example of this:
In other words "racism was 150 years ago... so stop talking about it in a current events thread...."
freedom - the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint.
taking freedom from someone else is a restraint
OK. But given this context:I'm not saying racism is only a thing of the 19th Century, far from it, but discussing what Lincoln may or may not have done can't possibly be considered recent politics.
So what are you offering them now?
the same thing slaves should have gotten back then, freedom... with no strings attached
doesn't mention or discuss Abraham Lincoln. Or was your post directed at someone else / missing a quote?So... monetary reparations and/or land/real estate grants, coupled with lifelong tax exemptions? Or just more words, words, words?
EDIT: If its the former, please don't forget to link to the Libertarian candidate for POTUS advocating same... or stay silent... either/or.