Clown Car V: 2020 version!

[Farm Boy]

...whatever. It's fun to decide for yourself other's worship. That definitely seems a western bougie pos move in my experience.

He's getting overridden.

 

[cardgame]

...whatever. It's fun to decide for yourself other's worship. That definitely seems a western bougie pos move in my experience.

He's getting overridden.

You deny that his cultists treat him like a god?

 

[Farm Boy]

Do you deny that people I stipulate treat him as a god treat him as a god?

Derp.

His own party is overriding him on the way out the door. The one that picked up seats. This is going to sound like whining about Clinton very soon.

 

[Lexicus]

...whatever. It's fun to decide for yourself other's worship. That definitely seems a western bougie pos move in my experience.

He's getting overridden.

Farm Boy ima help you out
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figure_of_speech

 

[Farm Boy]

Cram it.

 

[Estebonrober]

The one that picked up seats.

I'm still completely befuddled by this phenomena. The GOP is literally making it harder for most of their supporters to leave their children a better life than they have had and yet they still back this party. On every level and policy they are regressive.

 

[r16]

nothing to be surprised . When the country goes backward those with the right qualities will be able to beat up losers and get their lunch , their lack of qualifications will mean nothing if the country is literally made dumber . Because this is also the essense of New Turkey .

 

[Lexicus]

Cram it.

I'm still completely befuddled by this phenomena. The GOP is literally making it harder for most of their supporters to leave their children a better life than they have had and yet they still back this party. On every level and policy they are regressive.

Conservatism has a multi-millennia history of befuddling large numbers of the common people into supporting, and indeed loving, the order that oppresses and despises them. It is very difficult to run a society on the basis of pure coercion and terror, and the history of the last two thousand years is in large measure the history of conservative methods of psychological domination becoming more and more sophisticated as a result of common people becoming less ignorant.

 

[Farm Boy]

Insincerity isn't your best trait. Well, maybe.

 

[El_Machinae]

I'm still completely befuddled by this phenomena. The GOP is literally making it harder for most of their supporters to leave their children a better life than they have had and yet they still back this party. On every level and policy they are regressive.

There is the additional introspection, that they are hearing something that you are not. I am no Trump Whisperer, so I can't unpack it, but there have to be a variety of individual reasons that are individually comprehensible

 

[Lexicus]

Insincerity isn't your best trait. Well, maybe.

dude I'm not trying to be mean to you or anything, there's no call for this kind of hostility. I just think you maybe took BJ's comment a bit too literally.

 

[Berzerker]

Assessing a trespass is a judgement. There can be no forgiveness without first a judgement.

It's not that easy.

I would never suggest that the bar that Jesus sets is easy

The bar appears bent, dont judge but forgive those you've deemed trespassers... Maybe judgement is more than merely identifying trespasses. Jesus said if someone wrongs you, tell them so they may (or may not) make amends. What happens if they dont? Forgiveness anyway, personal banishment, call the cops?

Ignoring the subplot of the story of Pharisees testing him, they were not guilty of criticizing the adulteress but condemning her. The verse has come to include hypocritical criticism, like Biden and Trump calling each other liars.

Oh wow, another "libertarian" hypocrite. Why do you care if someone does drugs and has consensual sex with prostitutes? Sounds to me like you're jealous. Maybe the size of Hunter's manhood made you feel emasculated?

It's not surprising that so many libertarian babies ignore their own beliefs to defend their daddy Donald, but it sure is pathetic. Libertarians are a joke!

I'm a fan of drugs and prostitutes, both should be legal. The photos are relevant to identifying the owner of the lap top, not because of Hunter's taste in entertainment. But they do show one of the many hypocrisies of the drug war, a nasty one. Joe Biden spent decades destroying black communities with cruel and usual punishments for young black people while his own blood was the demand side of that equation.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...ussian-trick-a-hack-job-or-just-what-it-looks

If it wasn't mine I'd say so, the Biden's silence is deafening. I wonder if the FBI has already asked Hunter if its his, seems like the 1st thing they'd find out. They must already know.

Oh yeah, that's a catch. Berzerker keeps complaining about the Democrat war on drugs or something.

Joe made sure millions of people spent time in cages for drugs while Hunter and other connected - privileged - people were treated differently. The drug war is the most hypocritical policy I can think of, an effective replacement for Jim Crow. We need a 2st step act asap and defunding the DEA to pay for helping the people we let out of jail.

Who is "we"?

"John 8:7 In my analogy the Pharisee is the Biden voter complaining about Trump's corruption."

Me and the Pharisee

I already explained that.

This is what you said:

There's so much wrong with your analogy, so many holes, so many contradictions, but lets address this contradiction first. Is it Biden himself who is supposed to be the Pharisees or is it Biden-voters? Cause those are two totally different things.

In my analogy the Biden voter is the Pharisee complaining about Trump's corruption. Then I brought up Biden complaining about Trump's foreign policy given what Joe has unleashed upon the world. In that situation Biden is the Pharisee.

That wouldn't happen, for too many reasons to enumerate. However, what I will say is that putting your impossible hypothetical aside... that question itself is so you... in that it presumes that everyone thinks as you do, ie respond to criticism with deflection, blame-shifting and whataboutism.

So to respond to the real point of your question generally, if someone criticized me for doing something "wrong" and they were correct, I would acknowledge that I'd done something wrong and apologize, period.

Oh really? I see... So how about Jesus' "alleged" existence... since we're going there, apparently?

If the nature of Jesus is going to be subject to your self-serving "alleged" qualifier whenever its convenient to your argument, then Jesus' words, that you are so fond of invoking, ie "cast the first stone" and so on... carry no more authoritative weight, than Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny.

That was an "if" question, imagine the impossible. If Trump criticized you, would you 'whatabouthim'?

As for Jesus' perfection, that was a debate within the Christian community. I only said alleged because they didn't agree. How could Jesus be human and perfect? You can see the problem. Seems like a subjective argument anyway, whats perfect? But it doesn't matter if Jesus was perfect or not, either his words strike a chord or they ring hollow.

 

[Ferocitus]

Mormons to win 2 senate seats in Georgia!

 

[Estebonrober]

There is the additional introspection, that they are hearing something that you are not. I am no Trump Whisperer, so I can't unpack it, but there have to be a variety of individual reasons that are individually comprehensible

The reasons tend to only be comprehendible when viewed from very limited frames of reference. They tend to conglomerate around apathy or outright hostility to the "other" (this has a wide net for most in my anecdotal experience), and even those who claim to harken to a libertarian's supposed point of view inevitably give up the game when the chips are on the table.

 

[Kyriakos]

Biden calls Kamala "President-elect Harris"

I think his mental abilities may well make it true, but it's still embarassing.

(yes, the video is hosted by the Sun - Biden is the only one speaking so it doesn't matter)

 

[Ziggy Stardust]

I think his mental abilities may well make it true, but it's still embarrassing.

That means you believe that Biden didn't misspeak but actually believes Kamala Harris is president-elect. Is that right?

What did you think about the rest of what he was saying?

 

[Kyriakos]

That means you believe that Biden didn't misspeak but actually believes Kamala Harris is president-elect. Is that right?

What did you think about the rest of what he was saying?

I don't believe Biden wanted to say it, he is just not really able to speak correctly by now. Tbh I am not sure how you managed to misread it
It was another terrible gaffe - yet it may become true, since Biden can't really be potus for long due to age/health.

 

[r16]

this Biden guy has always voted against a certain country or something , ever since 1975 , aren't you supposed to wish him well ?

 

[Kyriakos]

this Biden guy has always voted against a certain country or something , ever since 1975 , aren't you supposed to wish him well ?

I don't think it matters what Biden does (or even wants - tbh I doubt he cares much), nor what Trump did. The US does have a stable plan for such things.
I do think that if [what you refer to] tries to go to the east, it will have to lose the western part, cause [some closed small sea] is one strategic continuum with [some nearby larger sea].

So who knows, r16, maybe in the near future [some posters] will be part of the same [some kind of territorial demarcation]. After all, [some president] seems to want to move the capital to the westernmost city of the peninsula, so fun times can't be that far away.

 

[Ziggy Stardust]

I don't believe Biden wanted to say it, he is just not really able to speak correctly by now. Tbh i am not sure how you managed to misread it
It was another terrible gaffe - yet it may become true, since Biden can't really be potus for long due to age/health.

Of course he didn't want to say it, because he misspoke. And I have listened to the whole thing, and I understood what he said. Which is why I asked, what did you think of the rest he was saying?

As far as I'm concerned, the way he speaks is an improvement over the last guy.