- Joined
- Jun 20, 2004
- Messages
- 4,843
Okay, @bite . You can retire to your crypt. I mean, go to bed now.
bah crypts are so 19th century
Okay, @bite . You can retire to your crypt. I mean, go to bed now.
Doesn't look like there's gonna be a first look today, when is the next chance? Tomorrow or thursday?
Oh well
They have done wednesdays before, but IIRC that was only when there was a holiday or a special reason.
Oh well
They have done wednesdays before, but IIRC that was only when there was a holiday or a special reason.
lol I play in a $50/person Winner-take-all game. AUS, PERSIA, NUB, SUM, ScY, and MAc are insta-banned.Well if they are anything like the other DLC civs they will be completely broken and immediatly banned in MP..
At some point, doesn't OP become the norm?
As long as you are no more than 6 players, you should keep them open. With so much choice, anyone is bound to get one!lol I play in a $50/person Winner-take-all game. AUS, PERSIA, NUB, SUM, ScY, and MAc are insta-banned.
As we get more and more DLC and expansion civs, the vanilla ones will simply feel UP.
As long as you are no more than 6 players, you should keep them open. With so much choice, anyone is bound to get one!
I can add you to the game if you like. We play offline (via LAN) mostly so no internet issues. I usually play RUS or ARABIA, because horse units.As long as you are no more than 6 players, you should keep them open. With so much choice, anyone is bound to get one!
Yea, I can't help but feel that feeling where you play a game like civ 5, and you feel the age of each civ as of their releases. I just wish Firaxis would touch up on the older civs, making them either better suited for new mechanics or not suck as much. I mean, CA did it with the Old World update for WARHAMMER 1, why not Firaxis?As we get more and more DLC and expansion civs, the vanilla ones will simply feel UP.
Thanks, but I don't play multiplayer.I can add you to the game if you like. We play offline (via LAN) mostly so no internet issues. I usually play RUS or ARABIA, because horse units.
Yea, I can't help but feel that feeling where you play a game like civ 5, and you feel the age of each civ as of their releases. I just wish Firaxis would touch up on the older civs, making them either better suited for new mechanics or not suck as much. I mean, CA did it with the Old World update for WARHAMMER 1, why not Firaxis?
at $50 per game; it's like inviting a kid to play high-stakes poker.Thanks, but I don't play multiplayer.![]()