Do you find the Babe Thread degrading?

Let's just put it this way.... be glad that I'm not an Off Topic moderator. :mischief:
 
But remember one thing: Thunderfall is a guy!
I'm not sure he dislikes the Babe thread as much as you... :mischief:
 
De Lorimier said:
But remember one thing: Thunderfall is a guy!
I'm not sure he dislikes the Babe thread as much as you... :mischief:

Hopefully you won't follow that thought through to the logical conclusion, regarding the Hunk Thread being allowed... ;)
 
IglooDude said:
Hopefully you won't follow that thought through to the logical conclusion, regarding the Hunk Thread being allowed... ;)
You're saying there's something wrong with being bi? :nono:
 
@ Mathilda, Show Igloo who's boss!

Anyway,
Just becuase you think somebody is beatiful or sexy doesn't mean, you're shallow, or perverted, and I don't understand how people get that imperssion.
 
Mathilda said:
You're saying there's something wrong with being bi? :nono:

:lol: Oh hell no. Just that speculation about TF's private affairs is prone to incorrect speculation at best, and moderation at worst. ;)

And is this where I'm supposed to say "and some of my best friends are bi"? :p
 
IglooDude said:
And is this where I'm supposed to say "and some of my best friends are bi"? :p
Just jabbing you Igloo my friend :)
 
IglooDude said:
Hopefully you won't follow that thought through to the logical conclusion, regarding the Hunk Thread being allowed... ;)
I actually tought of mentionning the Hunk thread in my post, but decided against it. Now you had top go and mention it yourself! We wouldn't be in this mess if it wasn't for you!!! :mad: :p
 
Mathilda said:
Just jabbing you Igloo my friend :)

No worries. :) Besides, they really aren't bi, they just play that way as tv's. :p
 
Having recently looked through the Babe thread in it's entirety (I didn't go through all of them, of course - 8 pages was quite enough without a 500~ more) I've come to the conclusion that some of it borders on soft-core pornography, while some of it isn't so bad. I think you guys need to post more pictures that are more about a women being actually beautiful (Like Eran's pictures :p ) , and less about women acting like drunk lesbians. (Like Godwyn's pictures)
 
Elrohir said:
Having recently looked through the Babe thread in it's entirety (I didn't go through all of them, of course - 8 pages was quite enough without a 500~ more) I've come to the conclusion that some of it borders on soft-core pornography, while some of it isn't so bad. I think you guys need to post more pictures that are more about a women being actually beautiful (Like Eran's pictures :p ) , and less about women acting like drunk lesbians. (Like Godwyn's pictures)
I agree somewhat. I do think that the idea of babe in some of Godwynn's pictures is not what I consider to be a babe, but the same applies to Eran's pictures also, because too often they are too much "girl nextdoor" type, and that is fine some of the time, but you can have classy women also, and that is what I believe is a true babe.
 
classical_hero said:
But the same applies to Eran's pictures also, because too often they are too much "girl nextdoor" type, and that is fine some of the time, but you can have classy women also, and that is what I believe is a true babe.

That is the beauty of the babe Thread. I really like the "girl next door" look (probably because all my neighbors were elderly), and c_h likes the classy style. But these are both valid ways of admiring beauty. Remember the pages-long debate I had with Cartesian Fart in Thread XVI about the nature of beauty?
 
Yes, I find some of it degrading.
Just to clarify, I don't find pictures of attractive females degrading in itself, I am about as far from a prude as anybody here.
I find it degrading when somebody posts just certain female body-parts. Please don't tell me that is not objectifying.People have faces.
I find some euphemistically speaking "suggestive" photos posted on it lacking both taste and respect.
I find quite a few comments not very nice.
Perhaps it is an age and experience thing, but it has made me refrain from posting there so far.
 
.Shane. said:
Like I said, I have no problems w/ the thread, per se. TBH, I don't typically browse it, at least not from work.

I think its funny that anytime someone is for some kind of courtesy that others disagree w/ that courtesy suddenly is "PC". So, PC is the term used as a de-legitimizer. Interesting.

As to you last point about being available "everywhere", that may be true, but its irrelevant as to having said thread here or not.

So, while I think we'd be better off w/ out such threads, my objection is pretty mild to indifferent.

I din't mean your criticism was PC and you seemed to me to be closest to what I myself was thinking, what I meant was if it was banned then it would be a bit PC, because obviously there is not enough concencus against the site or we would have heard about it, either here or by a lock on the thread. Mildly objecting to something is not being PC, overreacting to minority public opinion most certainly is. Sorry if I sounded like I was accusing you of being PC, your posting style doesn't strike me that way if it's any conselation :)
 
Shaihulud said:
The babe in question is suppose to be an attractive adult female person. By posting pictures of infants, you may be misconstrued as a pedophile.

And I was just about to post a picture of my nine month old daughter!

The Mods should rename those threads, removing the word 'babe'.
 
Sidhe said:
Sorry if I sounded like I was accusing you of being PC, your posting style doesn't strike me that way if it's any conselation :)

Yes, sometimes to my own detriment. :)

/ducks banstick

TBH, I don't mind if a view I have coincides w/ being PC. I just don't think this is an issue of PC, just one of courtesy and respect.

The perception is interesting, because when I think of being PC I tend to think, not of being in the minority opinion, but of grossly overreacting to something.

luceafarul said:
Yes, I find some of it degrading.
Just to clarify, I don't find pictures of attractive females degrading in itself, I am about as far from a prude as anybody here.
I find it degrading when somebody posts just certain female body-parts. Please don't tell me that is not objectifying.People have faces.
I find some euphemistically speaking "suggestive" photos posted on it lacking both taste and respect.
I find quite a few comments not very nice.
Perhaps it is an age and experience thing, but it has made me refrain from posting there so far.


Well said.
 
Back
Top Bottom