De Lorimier said:But remember one thing: Thunderfall is a guy!
I'm not sure he dislikes the Babe thread as much as you...![]()
You're saying there's something wrong with being bi?IglooDude said:Hopefully you won't follow that thought through to the logical conclusion, regarding the Hunk Thread being allowed...![]()
Mathilda said:You're saying there's something wrong with being bi?![]()
Just jabbing you Igloo my friendIglooDude said:And is this where I'm supposed to say "and some of my best friends are bi"?![]()
Yes, but only for the viewers, not the beautiful women shown there.Do you find the Babe Thread degrading?
I actually tought of mentionning the Hunk thread in my post, but decided against it. Now you had top go and mention it yourself! We wouldn't be in this mess if it wasn't for you!!!IglooDude said:Hopefully you won't follow that thought through to the logical conclusion, regarding the Hunk Thread being allowed...![]()
Mathilda said:Just jabbing you Igloo my friend![]()
I agree somewhat. I do think that the idea of babe in some of Godwynn's pictures is not what I consider to be a babe, but the same applies to Eran's pictures also, because too often they are too much "girl nextdoor" type, and that is fine some of the time, but you can have classy women also, and that is what I believe is a true babe.Elrohir said:Having recently looked through the Babe thread in it's entirety (I didn't go through all of them, of course - 8 pages was quite enough without a 500~ more) I've come to the conclusion that some of it borders on soft-core pornography, while some of it isn't so bad. I think you guys need to post more pictures that are more about a women being actually beautiful (Like Eran's pictures) , and less about women acting like drunk lesbians. (Like Godwyn's pictures)
classical_hero said:But the same applies to Eran's pictures also, because too often they are too much "girl nextdoor" type, and that is fine some of the time, but you can have classy women also, and that is what I believe is a true babe.
classical_hero said:Of course. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
.Shane. said:Like I said, I have no problems w/ the thread, per se. TBH, I don't typically browse it, at least not from work.
I think its funny that anytime someone is for some kind of courtesy that others disagree w/ that courtesy suddenly is "PC". So, PC is the term used as a de-legitimizer. Interesting.
As to you last point about being available "everywhere", that may be true, but its irrelevant as to having said thread here or not.
So, while I think we'd be better off w/ out such threads, my objection is pretty mild to indifferent.
Shaihulud said:The babe in question is suppose to be an attractive adult female person. By posting pictures of infants, you may be misconstrued as a pedophile.
Sidhe said:Sorry if I sounded like I was accusing you of being PC, your posting style doesn't strike me that way if it's any conselation![]()
luceafarul said:Yes, I find some of it degrading.
Just to clarify, I don't find pictures of attractive females degrading in itself, I am about as far from a prude as anybody here.
I find it degrading when somebody posts just certain female body-parts. Please don't tell me that is not objectifying.People have faces.
I find some euphemistically speaking "suggestive" photos posted on it lacking both taste and respect.
I find quite a few comments not very nice.
Perhaps it is an age and experience thing, but it has made me refrain from posting there so far.