That's unclear, if by that you mean that 3% popular vote is the magic number that means the Democrat likely wins in the electoral college. We know that Hillary soundly lost in 2016 while winning the popular vote by 2.1% and Obama won the electoral college in 2012 convincingly, winning the popular vote by 3.9%. So it would seem that the sweet spot is above 2.1%, but less than 3.9%. 538 has Harris up currently by 2.7% and RCP has her up by 2%. That 2% lead is probably not good enough, but the 2.7% might be enough.Trump's losing the popular vote pretty much no matter what. Popular vote doesn't matter. 3% apparently is the magic number Harris needs to carry the popular vote.
There is almost no chance that Pennsylvania will be called on election night, sadly, so we are likely in for a long, stressful election week, again.Whoever carries Pennsylvania will likely win imho assuming no supreme court shenanigans. IMHO of course. If Trump loses Pennsylvania he probably loses elsewhere so call it for Harris on Election night of she carries Pennsylvania.
I'm holding out hope for Harris winning a state election night that is a shocker, like Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas or Florida, that allows the networks to call the election in her favor without waiting for Pennsylvania or Georgia. On 538 Iowa was polling 10-12% in favor of Trump when Biden was the opponent. That's down to 4% since Harris took over. On 538 Ohio is polling really well for Trump at 9%, but 270toWin (another polling aggregator site with a nice interactive map) still has Ohio as only leaning Trump as opposed to solid red. South Carolina shows as solid red on that same site, but South Caralina is also about 30% black, one of the highest in the nation, so that's an x-factor, depending on turnout. 270 has Florida and Texas both in the "lean Republican category", with 538 having them at 4% and 6% Trump respectively. So Harris would have to overperform to snag either of those.The last two comments are both true. We may know (from overperforming) that she's going to win and not know (from PA not being called) that she has won.
GA is also likely not to be called on election night (and perhaps not for long after), because of all of the crazy rules the election board has been devising.
But if she were to carry WI, MI and NC, then even so little as NV or (my surprise pick) IA would put her over the top (let alone FL, OH or TX), and would let networks make the call on election night--even with, say, AZ going his way and PA and GA still out. (though AZ won't go his way if IA goes to Harris).
And an election night call would make all of his (predictable) shenanigans a real uphill climb.
Announcer: ‘you have taken the lead’.
OI! Careful with the counting there.People in their 40s, particularly their early 40s are generally considered Millennials.
NORTH CAROLINA (The Borowitz Report)—In an official statement released on Tuesday, the entire staff of the pornographic website Nude Africa has resigned in order to distance themselves from Lt. Governor Mark Robinson.
“We have long been proud of our association with Nude Africa,” the statement read. “Unfortunately, Mr. Robinson’s posts on the website have tarnished Nude Africa’s good name.”
In order to “restore the stellar reputation of Nude Africa,” the ex-staffers urged the porn site’s proprietors to “demand that Mr. Robinson drop out as a commenter on Nude Africa’s message boards at once.”
Asked about the controversy, Sen. JD Vance said, “Before I comment, I need to spend a few more days looking at Nude Africa.”
If Trump loses NC, it will be because of Robinson. Trump only endorses the best of the best!
Except just as a stimulus to people on the left to get themselves out to vote: "Look at the wretches we get otherwise." And because it's plural, it has more of a motivating force.
Don't know how to convert that to numbers, of course.
It is disputable if there's much you can do to reasonably increase turnout this late. At this point the candidates have known positions on the animating turnout issues.Turnout matters more than the tiny number of actual swing voters in the age of hyper-partisanship.