2metraninja
Defender of Nabaxica
Maybe we give them choice between settling their Elephant city west of the mountains and settling their Sugar city, or they settling their Elephant city at U1 and not settling their Sugar city.
Fine. No hurry
Since our relations are good, we would like to suggest to open our borders for trade. The great river flowing between us would convey our trading ships and bring both of us a lot of trade revenues.
Yuufo
Good idea. I will offer them OB in game.I say we offer OB immediately. Might as well get the trade routes, plus show the Spaniards that our friendship with UCiv has just strengthened. Make them sweat a bit about a stack coming down on them from the north.
I still think that most of the perceived trouble is due to communication problems and is not intentional from their part. I strongly believe that the "almost war" situation was mainly in our heads. I do not believe this due to naïve belief on sincerity or such. I base my opinion on the communications. In our hour of darkness we suggested some rather expensive bribes so we don't have to fight a war in two fronts. They didn't take the bribes but gave us a long NAP that we also want. Compared to what they skipped, I think negotiating where the border cities will be is not really asking for concessions.Just skimmed a lot of this thread. Seems pretty clear that UCiv relishes these stick-poking types of negotiations. We've gone from downright friendly to almsot at war and all the way back again in a very short amount of turns and it would seem to be by design (their design). With a long-term NAP now in place and us at war with SpAp, they wasted very little time in leveraging the situation. They agree to long term peace and ask us for concessions in the same breath. Whether we choose to treat these as separate issues or not, it's no coincidence that they were jammed together like that.
I still think that most of the perceived trouble is due to communication problems and is not intentional from their part. I strongly believe that the "almost war" situation was mainly in our heads. I do not believe this due to naïve belief on sincerity or such. I base my opinion on the communications. In our hour of darkness we suggested some rather expensive bribes so we don't have to fight a war in two fronts. They didn't take the bribes but gave us a long NAP that we also want. Compared to what they skipped, I think negotiating where the border cities will be is not really asking for concessions.
So wise that he died in a pool of his own blood as all his enemies surrounded and ovewhelmed him, as he tried to snort all his piled high "sugar" before he diedBut another wise man once said, "First we get the sugar, then we get the power, and then we get the women!"
Making friends rather than enemies is more important than sugar.
We welcome the newly opened borders between our nations to strengthen our friendship.
We agreed to one exception to the no-settling border area for them, but your second proposed city will be second settled in the same no-settling border are which idea was to not allow cluttering of cities and fighting cultures which can make tensions in our otherwise perfect neighborhood.
We would suggest that you to settle your second city for bananas and gems on the north bank of the salt lake to leave our Marble city a bit of green land to feed on. Or if you prefer to have your banana/gems city in the no- settling border area, you can move your Elephant city west of the mountains to leave some green land for our marble city which otherwise would be under culture pressure from two cities.
CivFanatics Team <diplo.civfanatics@gmail.com> (sent by dimo.neykov@gmail.com)
8:32 AM (0 minutes ago)
to Lala
We welcome the NAP and newly opened borders between our nations to strengthen our friendship.
As for settling our border area, we agreed to one exception to the no-settling border area for you, but your second proposed city will be second settled in the same no-settling border area which idea was to not allow cluttering of cities and fighting cultures which can make tensions in our otherwise perfect neighborhood.
We would be happy you to settle your second city for bananas and gems on the north bank of the salt lake to leave our Marble city a bit of green land to feed on. Or if you prefer to have your banana/gems city in the no- settling border area, you can move your Elephant city west of the mountains to leave some green land for our marble city which otherwise would be under culture pressure from two your cities.
Please inform us which variant you choose.
Team CFC
Hi,
I am afraid neither of those variants suits us
But we don't plan to found the banana-gem city for a long time.
Yuufo