Is that the new dog whistle? Does it come with a hand gesture, special pin or ribbon, facial gesticulation?
Consider it a crossover moment with the moral foundations thread. They can be equal before the Eyes of God, but they definitely are not equal in their hungers, impulses, and guiding stars(the people in federal government in Washington DC being at question, right?).
Let's even not be cynical for a moment. Over in the other thread you postulate that the top three moral foundations are considered "good" by posters who score high on those values while scoring low on the bottom three, and that they then consider those foundations "bad." I don't think that's quite the case. I think that the posters you seem to be referring to act plenty often under guiding principles of in-group bias, purity, and authority. They've just been taught that specific examples thereof
are instead(erroneously) care, liberty, and fairness. The examples in the test then creating its biases(such as with non Americans boggling at weaponry questions). Even better, if they score very very low on certain values the whole presumption of the test(for whatever it's worth) is that they literally can't even see/understand the principle they're acting on. The "bottom three" scored lower for me than the top as well, even if they were relatively high when compared to different people's results. Keeping that in mind, I would say the majority of the acrimonious disagreements I get into on this board are over my objections to (what I see as) purity enforcement, authority plays, and in-group biases casting people out or grinding them under. But then in order to have that fight, in that context, one needs to start picking at the borders of what they consider their in-group, explaining that it's ok to care about those outside of it, understanding what betrayals/diseases they fear and arguing what cures are worse than the disease, and explaining that simply forcing people to comply with things that make themselves feel more free isn't universal. Then you wind up being from the moon, hard to understand, and ... crypitc? I guess? It's probably because I'm not particularly good at it, but it's hard to have enough social purchase and understanding across a continent(s) with only a message-board-bond to work with. At least for me it is. Especially when some shared cultures now transcend raw physical distance with light-based-communications. Some people very far away in meat space are very close in relative culture whereas somebody in a slow eddy in the county might have half a century of day-to-day drift in the lived life.