• We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days. For more updates please see here.

Homeless woman arrested for theft, for enrolling child in school

Left

Real Game Out Here
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
1,797
Location
AK or OR
http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/120004374.html
Cops Bust Homeless Woman for Sending Child to School
Police say she stole $15,000 in costs to cover her kid's education.

By Bob Connors


A homeless and unemployed woman from Bridgeport has been arrested for enrolling her 5-year-old son at a Norwalk elementary school.

Tonya McDowell, 33, is accused of stealing $15,000 -- the cost of her son's public education -- from the Norwalk School District, according to the Stamford Advocate. She was arrested last Thursday.

“I was just walking to eat lunch at the shelter and they jumped out and locked me up,” she said.

Her son was kicked out of Brookside in December because of the residency issue and McDowell enrolled him in Bridgeport schools, and she thought that was the end of it.

But, police began investigating in January, after the Norwalk Housing Authority filed a complaint that McDowell had registered her son at Brookside Elementary School in Norwalk, even though she had been living in an apartment on Priscilla Street in Bridgeport.

McDowell admitted to police she was allowed to sleep in the apartment on Priscilla Street in Bridgeport by the tenant, but had to leave during the day, according to the Advocate. She also told police she sometimes stayed at an emergency shelter in Norwalk.

Police say McDowell used the Norwalk address of the boy's babysitter to register him at the school. After the investigation, the babysitter was evicted.

"At the time, I was just staying in my van and not having anywhere to go," McDowell said.

McDowell’s story hits home for Gwen Samuel, an unemployed parent from Meriden who is fighting for Tanya’s son and other children who could easily get lost in this education shuffle.

“It doesn't make any sense. It doesn't make any sense at all,” she said. “We, as the adults need to figure this system out. This is not OK, under no circumstances.”

Samuel has contacted legislators for help and is coordinating a grassroots effort to support McDowell, even though the two have never met.

Typically, when there is a residency question, a private investigator is hired to handle the matter, authorities said, so why this time police were called in resulting in criminal charges is unclear.

Lt. Paul Resnick said this is the first time he has heard of this happened.

"Usually when they find a kid out of district, they send him back. I have never heard of people being arrested for it," Norwalk Board of Education Chairman Jack Chiaramonte told the Advocate.

The apparent crackdown may have something to do with the city's tightening budget.

"This now sends a message to other parents that may have been living in other towns and registering their kids with phony addresses," Norwalk Mayor Richard Moccia said.

McDowell, whose last known address was in Bridgeport, is facing first-degree larceny and conspiracy to commit larceny charges, the paper reported.

Another example of how being poor has been effectively criminalized. After the Ohio incident and outcry, you have to wonder how to school thought this was a great idea.
 
Public school is not free and enjoyed by everyone, unless you can prove you pay taxes? Is this a case to try to prove that everyone can have free medical care and not pay taxes? I am confused. Will some one who has no children in school and pays taxes please stand up and say that they are responsible for the $15,000 dollars and allow this homeless person to remain homeless. Why stop there? Isn't that child abuse to not provide a home?
 
I never know whether extreme right-wing positions are being proposed sincerely or as a spoof.
 
I never know whether extreme right-wing positions are being proposed sincerely or as a spoof.
Connecticut is hardly right wing.
 
I didn't say they were. I was referring to Timtofly's post.
 
I never know whether extreme right-wing positions are being proposed sincerely or as a spoof.

It's a mess, but I don't disagree with the school. In the US, schools are run locally, and funded locally. You can't hop school districts on a whim, and districts are very vigilant for this type of behaviour.

Now, if a woman cannot establish any type of residency / permanent address, I do think exceptions should be made. I'm also in favour of totally changing the way schools are funded.
 
In school, the child is occupied for hours on end, is fed, educated and kept off the streets. It is clearly better for him to be at school, any school, than homeless and uneducated. If the boy's mother hadn't sent him to school, no doubt the police would be arresting her for non-compliance with state education laws instead.
 
In school, the child is occupied for hours on end, is fed, educated and kept off the streets. It is clearly better for him to be at school, any school, than homeless and uneducated. If the boy's mother hadn't sent him to school, no doubt the police would be arresting her for non-compliance with state education laws instead.

The core of this story is enrolling your kid in a district in which you don't live, and that's fraud. Clearly there needs to be mechanisms to establish residency for homeless persons' children. Perhaps letting them enrol at the parent's last known address.
 
Am I missing something, how could a homeless person afford a babysitter for their child?
Police say McDowell used the Norwalk address of the boy's babysitter to register him at the school.

That may be the problem. (Ironic I was in Conneticut Yesterday isn't it?)

Yeah if they were right wing she would have lost the child a long time ago and been thrown in jail for loitering.
 
Am I missing something, how could a homeless person afford a babysitter for their child?

No one said it was a good babysitter.

"Here's 20 bucks, watch him while I look for a job."
 
Yeah if they were right wing she would have lost the child a long time ago and been thrown in jail for loitering.

:lol:

You surely have a very shallow, inaccurate view of right-wing politics.

BTW: I am pretty right-wing, and I totally oppose this arrest. At worst, make the child attend his local school and POSSIBLY a fine (Depends on how long they attended the incorrect school)

That's very ironic. Did you see any homeless people there? :p

Well, a lot of people were wearing Red Sox and Patriots Jerseys (I'm a Yankees fan and a Dolphins fan) so, yeah...

Seriously though, I was at Mystic Seaport, its a tourist area mostly, so I doubt many homeless people were there.

That said, this is the Tristate Area...
 
Well at least she'll have a roof over her head.

I've heard it (Jokingly) suggested that those with no source of income would be wise to commit a crime so they could go to jail and get a home:p

Seriously though, this arrest was blatantly wrong. Arrest of people for non-violent crimes is unnecessary and a waste of money. Heck, prison itself is morally dubious, and I think the argument that prison is state-sponsored kidnapping is FAR better than the argument that capital punishment is state-sponsored murder (Capital Punishment obeys a broader principle of "Eye for an eye" while prison is a totally arbitrary source of punishment.)

I agree with prison to restrain the violent, since it is simply unsafe to keep them in society, so prison is appropriate for them, but I don't support it as a straight-up punishment (Where the only goal is to punish) unless society makes it so we cannot punish them properly.
 
Public school is not free and enjoyed by everyone, unless you can prove you pay taxes? Is this a case to try to prove that everyone can have free medical care and not pay taxes? I am confused. Will some one who has no children in school and pays taxes please stand up and say that they are responsible for the $15,000 dollars and allow this homeless person to remain homeless. Why stop there? Isn't that child abuse to not provide a home?

The core of this story is enrolling your kid in a district in which you don't live, and that's fraud. Clearly there needs to be mechanisms to establish residency for homeless persons' children. Perhaps letting them enrol at the parent's last known address.

So how the US funds education is wrong then.

Clearly the kid should, more than anyone, be in school. If the bureaucracy erected puts the mother in jail then the bureaucracy is wrong.
 
I sure hope they throw the proper textbooks at them.
 
Back
Top Bottom