If you had to take over the world, what country would you invade first?

New Zealand
 
The Gambia. Why? Well, I would start in Senegal and just eat it, from there I blitz through Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, etc. All the way down to Benin. From there, who knows? Maybe I'll buddy up to the United States to get all the advanced arms I'd need to tear apart every other African country, then the Middle East, and finally, the world.
 
England. Because even if I lost, I'd still have hit the English.
But if you won, you'd have to live with the English as your base of operations and manpower.

I wouldn't invade Britain, but I'd nuke it before invading anything else.
 
No, the reasons aren't obvious. They don't have nearly as many natural resources as Russia or the U.S. Hell, Russia would just cut off natural gas and other stuff to Europe. This isn't WW2. And even then, Germany had to get access to oil which they couldn't completely do.

The question was what country would I invade first, so obviously I'm already the United States. I'd invade Germany peacefully, obviously, and then from America I shall conquer the surrounding countries, and Germany is in a central and wealthy point in Europe therefor allowing me to conquer the Europeans.
 
Australia, which I will then turn loose on the world, as everything in Australia can kill you.
 
The question was what country would I invade first, so obviously I'm already the United States. I'd invade Germany peacefully, obviously, and then from America I shall conquer the surrounding countries, and Germany is in a central and wealthy point in Europe therefor allowing me to conquer the Europeans.
Yeah, but it's not cool.
I mean seriously, what will be the flag of your empire? Gray stripes on gray background?
And your motto? "Concrete is useful! ... Yay!" or "Fun is for people who don't want to cash in on their pension fund!"

And what kind of square approach to being an evil overloard is that anyway?
You conquer Denmark first. And you don't do it for the quality of life, no, no, you do it because you love to bike!
That's what evil overlords do.
 
Madagascar must always fall first.

not really. What reason would that be? WW2? Let's see both Germany, and Russia invaded Poland. Neither country managed to take over the world. :p

My answer is Brazil. Whenever I'm playing Risk I usually go for the "lesser" continents first (while everyone is fighting over the big ones), get my additional troops per turn and use that to take over either North America, or Africa.

As any great Risk player knows that Europe is the last place to conquer. But then it would not be called Risk if no one attempted it, and yes, do not forget Madagascar.
 
I can deal with that, let the rightful population return and all that.
Eh. Takes too much work.

I'm not really interested in conquering the world, just settling scores.
 
Australia, which I will then turn loose on the world, as everything in Australia can kill you.

I would say Australia but not for the same reasons, but because of the vast mineral wealth in the country. You need resources to get going in this world and Australia is blessed with them.
 
Come on people, it's obvious.

Start with Brazil. As anyone who's played Rise of Nations can tell you, South America is a very reliable base.
 
If we're going off of risk, then clearly oceania, and a strong Indonesian guard.
 
India, as a powerbase, there are plenty of ethnic groups for you to both play off each other for control of the country as well as provide recruits for the army. Hell, a glorified PMC controlled a good chunk of the subcontinent for the better part of 100 years.
 
Back
Top Bottom