classical_hero
In whom I trust
Trump basically wants to disassamble nato. I'd rather keep a double safety check
No, he want Europe to do their fair share of the heavy lifting and not leave it all to America.
Trump basically wants to disassamble nato. I'd rather keep a double safety check
Because having the EU Japan and co pay for the US's massive army is totally fair. Not like paying a tribute at all.No, he want Europe to do their fair share of the heavy lifting and not leave it all to America.
You do know that countries pay the US for the latter to keep nuclear weapons in their territory, don't you?No, he want Europe to do their fair share of the heavy lifting and not leave it all to America.
You do know that countries pay the US for the latter to keep nuclear weapons in their territory, don't you?
[wiki]Trident nuclear programme[/wiki]
See that the Trident missiles themselves are leased from the US.
But it's supposed to strengthen the UK's economy because it provides jobs! Ignore the money being paid to foreign powers in exchange for independence!
Alright, if America will pick up the tab from thoroughly destabilizing the ME leading to all these massive refugee waves Europe has to deal with.
The UK tried a truly independent nuclear deterrent back in the '60s with the Blue Streak missile system. The whole thing became fiendishly complex and expensive, the UK ran out of money, and was forced to cancel it and CV-01 program (causing the UK to ditch actual carriers until the QE comes online).
Plus Trident is a joke. The UK already exists within the American nuclear umbrella and any situation where the UK launches nukes would have the Americans launching nukes anyhow. That also extends to the French. As much as I like to talk up the French maintaining a comprehensive domestic arms industry and independent action capacity; their nukes are in the exact same boat as the British but they at least have the argument of it being a prestige arm because it is domestic development.
Problem is, the US has never known what it actually wants over this.No, he want Europe to do their fair share of the heavy lifting and not leave it all to America.
Tell that to the Italians and, in particular, the Greeks.Second of all the massive tide of economic migrants started in earnst after Angela Merkel opened her big fat mouth and said she would let any and all comers to come on over and sign up for welfare with no questions asked. That is why you have so many fake refugees in the EU trying to game the system and get something for nothing.
Be thankful that the Colonial Office has changed its name, eh?This is precisely my position on Trident. It's entirely a prestige project - we have nuclear weapons because Great Powers have nuclear weapons - and we pay for it, as Eisenhower realised a long time ago, in roads, hospitals, schools, and all the things we actually want.
As FP pointed out, it's more about not wanting to be saddled with a new Chernobyl.Isnt that why the Scots dont want it?
As yet nothing has actually changed. Except the UK has pulled a curtain over it's own future a couple of years down the line.It seems that the sky has not fallen yet.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/aug/23/uk-economic-surveys-defy-brexit-fears