So now the media are complicit in destroying Jeremy Corbin's career because he spoke in favour of the referendum result?
Really??
No, the media is just backing its pals inside Labour. There are many long-standing ties there.
And they moved now against Corbyn - in desperation, that is obvious -
because...
What is going on with Corbyn and Labour anyhow? I thought Corbyn had already seen off most of his opponents; yet now it seems like they are coming out of the woodwork. Is it just pro-EU Labour politicians taking out their frustration on the nearest available target or is something else going on?
... there are elections coming, It's the only way to put in power a government with a mandate to deal with the results of the referendum. The reporters do their best to depict Corbyn in a bad light, playing the accusations of "lackluster campaign", insinuations that "he was a secret leave backer" and the old excuse, "he's unelectable".
The relevance of him having quickly committed to the result of the referendum is what it means for the future of Labour and the careers of its top members. If Corbyn remains as leader, the next campaign will have a party committed to an orderly exit, no backtracking. Such a position will be good for Labour candidates in many areas of England (meaning they may gain new seats there), but bad for those in the big urban areas - most of the seats that the party currently holds. Those people whose careers and connections are now comfortable, do not want that uncertainty. A rebellion is entirely rational from a political self-preservation viewpoint. Even if the party as a whole could come out ahead, many of the current crop of MP risk coming out of the next election as losers. And because Labour had already declined across much of England - losing the "working class vote" to indifference or even to the Tories and the UKIP - the current crop of MP is dominated by the ones who depend on a more pro-Remain electorate. Corbyn doesn't make
the party unelectable, but he may make
some of the current MP unelectable. And you know how most politicians behave: career ahead of ideology, if forced to choose between those the party and the country can burn for all they care.
My impression is that those Labour MP are living in a bubble and in for a huge shock in the next elections if they do win in their coup. They don't have any kind of appealing platform for their traditional voters, and are seen now as backstabbing the only recent party leader widely considered honest by the public. All the main newspapers have been in a blood frenzy trying to depict Corbyn's removal as a fait acoompli, his resignation as unavoidable. But if he doesn't oblige (and he just today made it clear) the rebels have no plan for how to beat him in a new leadership election inside the party. Then their apparent force gets exposed as control of mainstream media, the political reporters whit whom they have long-time relations are backing them, as well as the "professional opinion-makers". But not of the party "rank and file" of those people who actually care enough to vote.
They're betting on the (supposedly) mostly young, urban, and impressionable supporters of Corbyn in the past leadership election doubting and deserting under the barrage of accusations. The effect of aligning all the media and most of the MP in a chorus against Corbyn may however be just the opposite - if there is a lesson from last Thursday's vote is that people are angry and in no mood to be told what to believe by those "opinion-makers". Ans it's very hard to demonize someone against who the worst thing you can make up (and still be
remotely credible) is that "he can't win an election"... and then ask people to vote on that. It kind of invites from voters a reaction to demonstrate the opposite - again!