warpus
Sommerswerd asked me to change this
Sad. Very sad
Trump related talk is sucking in all the attention and energy like a black hole...
I don't mind US politics in OT, BTW...But I do understand how they might become a bit overwhelming for users outside of the United States...
CFC now has to compete against Reddit communities for Civilization. I don't see the forum as no longer being vibrant, but that trend does worry me some.
I don't think OT is dying, but I think it might have become a little stale, in some regards. As the OP mentioned, there are few newer threads started, and while I think that's balanced by the fact that a lot of threads go on for longer and become more in-depth, it does mean that a lot of the discussion circulates around current events, which may lead some posters to lose interest, particularly as Warpus pointed out if those events are only happening very indirectly to them.
I think part of the reason for that, though, is that current events are good at inspiring discussion. A lot of other threads are presented as open questions, which tend to peter out if the answers don't happen to spark some broader discussion, or deliberate attempts to provoke disagreement or debate, which while capable of producing very active threads, may just be the same handful of posters going back and forth for a dozen pages.
What we could probably do with is more threads built around concepts rather than events or identities, where the OP doesn't start "so this happened" or "X is Y, fight me", but by floating a notion that may or not be true, but the consideration of which is useful or interesting. Those are tricky, because it's hard to produce and articulate that sort of idea, and nobody wants to invest that energy if they're going to get three replies and then drop immediately to the third page. I'm not sure if there' a remedy for that, but I think perhaps we're become a little too reliant on the serial threads, a little too unwilling to believe that a thought or rant or question may actually be worth a discussion of its own, if it has a chance of spreading beyond the page or two which is usually considered the polite maximum use of space in a serial thread.
Eleanor Roosevelt said:Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.
If I gave you the impression that I wanted Trump related talk to stop, then that was my error. I don't. I am just acknowledging that Trump topics dominate the forum, which may in turn be why people feel like the other threads are "dying".Be the change you want to see. If you don't like Trump talk dominating the forum, then don't participate in those threads. Enough people do that and they will eventually be buried and people will be discouraged from posting about it because they'll think it's just a waste of time.
We have a perfectly good forum for that here.I miss discussing movies
How can Trump related talk not dominate the forums, he's like the most ridiculously absurd political satire ever imagined come true.
I do... but that's what work, NETFLIX, the movies, restaurants, kids sports games, local fairs, sex, beer, barbecues, yard work, gardening... etc, on and on... are for right?Don't you get tired of talking about it after a while though?
I do... but that's what work, NETFLIX, the movies, restaurants, kids sports games, local fairs, sex, beer, barbecues, yard work, gardening... etc, on and on... are for right?
Can anyone tell me why Reddit is so popular?
Where? The Arts and Entertainment forum? I did post there recently, but I always forget we have it. It's pretty dead.We have a perfectly good forum for that here.
Haha, well, I hadn't meant it to sound quite that pretentious. When I say "ideas", I don't mean philosophical concepts so much as threads which promoted discussion for discussion's sake, rather than for the narrower purposes of commentary on current events. Contemplative rather than reactive, I suppose is the distinction I'm trying to make, and both events and people are entirely fair game for that.For us to build more threads around concepts we need the participation of great minds.Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.
What we could probably do with is more threads built around concepts rather than events or identities, where the OP doesn't start "so this happened" or "X is Y, fight me", but by floating a notion that may or not be true, but the consideration of which is useful or interesting. Those are tricky, because it's hard to produce and articulate that sort of idea, and nobody wants to invest that energy if they're going to get three replies and then drop immediately to the third page. I'm not sure if there' a remedy for that, but I think perhaps we're become a little too reliant on the serial threads, a little too unwilling to believe that a thought or rant or question may actually be worth a discussion of its own, if it has a chance of spreading beyond the page or two which is usually considered the polite maximum use of space in a serial thread.