iSideWith

Spoiler :
YqX7m.jpg


92% Jill Stein
on science, social, environmental, domestic policy, foreign policy, healthcare, and economic issues

79% Barack Obama
on science, foreign policy, environmental, and economic issues

76% Gary Johnson
on domestic policy, social, and healthcare issues

39% Ron Paul
on domestic policy and healthcare issues

23% Mitt Romney
no major issues

62% American Voters
on science, domestic policy, environmental, foreign policy, healthcare, and economic issues.

Looks like I'm in touch with American voters, which is surprising because I would have thought that my answers to the questions were very.. non-American (support universal healthcare, gun laws, believe in evolution, etc.).. but lol @ Mitt Romney and

91% Democratic
90% Green
34% Libertarian
13% Republican
 
Why are you so mad?
Mad? I never thought of it that way but, if anything, I think you understated my position. I am outraged that partisans of the state find state atrocities to be funny (check the posts between yours and mine for examples). And I have absolutely no idea why the rest of the world isn't every bit as outraged as me,

Just to name one random outrage, Bradley Manning has been in solitary confinement for nearly nine hundred days. I find it difficult to imagine what that would do to my soul. I find it even more difficult to understand why every decent human being isn't as outraged as I am about what is being done to him.
 
Mad? I never thought of it that way but, if anything, I think you understated my position. I am outraged that partisans of the state find state atrocities to be funny. And I have absolutely no idea why aren't every bit as outraged as me,

Just to name one random outrage, Bradley Manning has been in solitary confinement for nearly nine hundred days. I find it difficult to imagine what that would do to my soul. I find it even more difficult to understand why every decent human being isn't as outraged as I am.

Wow. You have no clue about how the real world works. None. Hint: Betahood is all about whining instead of being a real man.

You make me ashamed to be male and you seriously need to grow a pair.

Sounds mad.
 
Mad? I never thought of it that way but, if anything, I think you understated my position. I am outraged that partisans of the state find state atrocities to be funny. And I have absolutely no idea why aren't every bit as outraged as me,
You seemed to have been mad at KMRblue for not reading the thread, which is what I was commenting on.

Just to name one random outrage, Bradley Manning has been in solitary confinement for nearly nine hundred days. I find it difficult to imagine what that would do to my soul. I find it even more difficult to understand why every decent human being isn't as outraged as I am.
I'm actually pretty sure I made a thread on that last year or something expressing my outrage.
 
Code:
Ron Paul _______________ 99%
Gary Johnson ___________ 98%
Virgil Goode ___________ 59%
Mitt Romney ____________ 37%
Jill Stein _____________ 27%
Rocky Anderson _________ 20%
Barack Obama ___________  9%

On the issues:

Ron Paul: economic, foreign policy, healthcare, domestic policy, environmental, social, and science issues
Gary Johnson: foreign policy, economic, domestic policy, healthcare, social, science, and environmental issues
Virgil Goode: domestic policy and environmental issues
Mitt Romney: environmental issues
Jill Stein: no major issues
Rocky Anderson: no major issues
Barack Obama: no major issues
 
91% Obama
89% Stein
17% Romney

Kinda like I expected
 
The Republican party is basically all about the things that I am *not* about. They are the exact opposite of my views on virtually everything.

In that context I find 13% incredibly insulting


I think that represents the fact that in some areas Democrats and Republicans really are not that far apart, or at least were not before this recent extreme right turn by the Republicans.
 
Jill Stein: 89% (foreign policy, domestic policy, science, healthcare, immigration, environmental, social issues)
Barack Obama: 83% (science, domestic policy, immigration, social, environmental issues)
Gary Johnson: 68% (foreign policy, science, immigration issues)
Ron Paul: 37% (foreign policy issues)
Virgil Goode: 18% (no major issues)
Mitt Romney: 11% (no major issues)

American voters: 57% (foreign policy, domestic policy, science, immigration, environmental, social issues)

Parties: 80% Democrats, 78% Greens, 51% Libertarians, 18% Republicans

Oh my, Romney, outclassed by paleoconservatives and the guy that's not even running (why is Ron Paul in there? To cater to internet libertarians or just to humiliate Romney further?). You're doing it wrong.

I'm maybe slanted a little towards Obama because I usually sided with his position on questions that were specifically about his policies. I also didn't give many topics that weren't that "hot" in the last term that much of a thought simply because I wasn't exposed to them yet. Oh, and the only question that I weighted at all was "Evolution is a fact", because it's an instant killer for me to disagree with that.

All in all, I quite liked that test. I really liked that I had more options than just yes/no. Most of the time it's "yes, except [obvious exception]" or "no, unless [special situation]" and it's nice to be able to reflect that in your answer so it can't be interpreted in the most extreme way like many other tests (seem to) do. I've used it almost every time. Also, the choice of questions and the way they were asked didn't seem to be biased.
 
71887479.jpg


Not surprising, although I have never heard of Virgil Goode.
 
Mad? I never thought of it that way but, if anything, I think you understated my position. I am outraged that partisans of the state find state atrocities to be funny (check the posts between yours and mine for examples). And I have absolutely no idea why the rest of the world isn't every bit as outraged as me,

Just to name one random outrage, Bradley Manning has been in solitary confinement for nearly nine hundred days. I find it difficult to imagine what that would do to my soul. I find it even more difficult to understand why every decent human being isn't as outraged as I am about what is being done to him.

I'll take it your amnesty international dues are up to date...

just in case, a link for you...

http://www.amnesty.org.au/news/comments/24599/
 
"Bradley Manning has not been convicted of any offence, but military authorities appear to be using all available means to punish him while in detention. This undermines the United States’ commitment to the principle of the presumption of innocence."

Par for the course, eh?
 
Good gawd. Real men stand up for themselves. Instead you crawl off and whine to the authorities. What a cowardly little worm you are. I seriously that they will back your tired little ass up at all. But in the case that they do, I will hold my neck up proud.

Do you even have a neck? All that kowtowing shrinks it, you know. And your manhood goes down even faster.

Could you clarify? If I report you, am I supporting state goons or merely allowing the market to express itself?

Ehn, placing you on ignore is the market expressing itself. I think that shows the most respect for your motif. Thanks for the scum discussion; I hope (for my benefit) people quote your good points and not your banal points from now on.
 
1. This site is populated with some of the worst statists like ever who will never listen to reason
2. Posting reason as a full-blown Libertarian-Anarchist here must be akin to pulling teeth.
3. Still full-blown Libertarian-Anarchist continues posting, despite knowing there are rules and the consequences of rules.
4. Conclusion: People are not always capable of making the right informed decisions.
 
Back
Top Bottom