The Fanatical
Prince
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
- Messages
- 417
Oops, more visual pleasure for us, I guess.

Oops, more visual pleasure for us, I guess.
You are probably right. We just haven't seen the other ways yet, which is why I was curious.I think the others can found their religion from the other way - like common civic trees, wonders, or events.
Abbasid can found theirs from the first unique civic tree bonus. I consider they're faster than the others.
Did we know that there were generic temples for founding a religion? I know there was the Altar in the Antiquity Age for pantheons, but this is the first that I have seen for anything.It’s probably a Abbasid-specific alternative to a generic Temple. The Temple allows for the founding of a Religion, while the Mosque does the same but with added benefits
Instead of it being a physical thing you construct, I interpret it as it's more of a social institution you construct, similar to Macedon's Basilikoi Paides which wasn't a physical thing either. As in you would create a quarter of "scholars" by placing a madrasa and mosque together.Which is a correct observation, and Sar adds later that the quarter name is indeed "Ulema".
I still feel this is a bit off, though, since neither "Ulema" nor "Alim" (ulema is plural for alim) ever refers to something you can physically construct in a city, unlike "Medina." (Although this is not the first time I feel the naming is off regarding the original language.)
I would have gone with a Waqf, personallyWhich is a correct observation, and Sar adds later that the quarter name is indeed "Ulema".
I still feel this is a bit off, though, since neither "Ulema" nor "Alim" (ulema is plural for alim) ever refers to something you can physically construct in a city, unlike "Medina." (Although this is not the first time I feel the naming is off regarding the original language.)
It is reasonable, of course. However, the names of nearly all the other UQs revealed up to this point (Necropolis, Acropolis, Uwaybil K'uh, Matha, Forum) refer to buildings and could be physically constructed IRL. The only exception, Five Hundred Lords of Chola, refers to an establishment, which could still be a building (similar to a UB named "East India Company" or something). The Mauryan example is a good comparison, as both Mauryan UBs are religious and academic buildings, while the Mauryan UQ is "Matha" (college or monastery), rather than a Sanskrit word for scholars like in the case of "Ulema."Well, I also confused about that... but we can consider about that the Unique Quarter is what actually not be built in the game, but formed from the exact pair of the unique buildings. UBs are definitely the physical architectures with its own functions. But maybe UQ can have a conceptual name inspired from the UBs?
Abbasid into Mongolia confirm... wait, no.until, like the fall of night, the Mongols appeared on the eastern horizon.
Looks like a cliff in a snow biome. There doesn't appear to be anything speciGuys, did you noticed that there is massive iceberg cliff in the last part of the video? I read it from the YouTube comment, and it looks so good and interesting!
Dunno, it's got those splintery bits of ice around it that you usually see round the edge of the maps in VI. Looks cool either way!Looks like a cliff in a snow biome. There doesn't appear to be anything speci
Yeah I feel like Ulema and Medina should be switched name wise…Yes, Madīnat was an old name for the quarter but should be Ulema. Updating site!
There are floating ices around it. IDK, will they mean the beautiful end of the map? Or there are the visual decorations for the coast of each biome?Looks like a cliff in a snow biome. There doesn't appear to be anything speci
Just take it, it's the common way of this franchise as we all know. I always see the Civ franchise as the 4X empire-building game with sort of historical flavor, rather than the accurate historical simulation game. Gamers want to see and play the Abbasid with its greatest features, not the historically accurate Abbasid with many problems it has.One things which annoys me though is that Civ is going to be yet another piece of pophistory which shall teach nonsense
Looking up alternative names it seems like Hawza could work. Though so far, I only have found that Shia use that term, and the Abbasids were Sunni.It is reasonable, of course. However, nearly all the other UQs revealed up to this point (Necropolis, Acropolis, Uwaybil K'uh, Matha, Forum) refer to buildings and could be physically constructed IRL. The only exception, Five Hundred Lords of Chola, refers to an establishment, which could still be a building. The Mauryan example is a good comparison, as both Mauryan UBs are religious and academic buildings, while the Mauryan UQ is "Matha" (college or monastery), rather than a Sanskrit word for scholars like in the case of "Ulema."
I believe that's correct, a building whose base yield is Culture.The reference to "Culture Buildings" means buildings with a culture yeild, correct? Or will buildings be categorized?
It seems yes to both, Buildings are categorized (the UBs are categorized) but their category= their base yield. (not adjacencies)The reference to "Culture Buildings" means buildings with a culture yeild, correct? Or will buildings be categorized?
No. I believe they said that Religion will play a big role in Culture during the Exploration Age.Speaking of yields... We don't have Faith yield this time around right?
No we don't. There's no Faith in this game... I guess that the Happiness will work as the religious cost in the Exploration age. Mosque is the Happiness base.Speaking of yields... We don't have Faith yield this time around right?