agamemnon_of_the-bronze_
Warlord
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2024
- Messages
- 159
some other posters were saying they are not unique enough to britain in another thread.I'm feel that Dreadnought is a contender for GB.
some other posters were saying they are not unique enough to britain in another thread.I'm feel that Dreadnought is a contender for GB.
That's weird, considering the whole style of warship was derived explicitly from HMS Dreadnought's design.some other posters were saying they are not unique enough to britain in another thread.
It makes sense for the Meiji project for Japan, fast tracking modernization.Yeah it feels like a bonus for doing what you’re going to be doing anyway, but like you said it makes it “feel” better and it is a great thematic reference to the modernization of Japan.
All civs are leaderless so it's no stranger than having Mughals without Akbar or Mongols without Temujin or Normans without William the Conqueror or Robert I. Also, if I'm not mistaken, depicting the Emperor is taboo in Japan.I've said it and I'll say it again: Meiji Japan without Mutsuhito is just weird. And he's one so far not featured in Civilization yet. I guess Himiko's controversy and gender won over the obvious choice.
Dreadnoughts, or "all big gun" battleships were built by everyone who could physically do it after Britain got theirs in first in 1906.some other posters were saying they are not unique enough to britain in another thread.
Of course. There's plenty of holes created by the leader-civ decoupling. The hint of the leader-based post-launch business model Civ7 is likely to adopt.All civs are leaderless so it's no stranger than having Mughals without Akbar or Mongols without Temujin or Normans without William the Conqueror or Robert I. Also, if I'm not mistaken, depicting the Emperor is taboo in Japan.
The first two sets of DLC have only 2 leaders, but 4 civs each, so I don't know that it will be any more leader-based, unless you're assuming they will be the selling points of those DLC? Most of what I've seen in conversations here suggests people think Britain and other big name civs will be the selling point.Of course. There's plenty of holes created by the leader-civ decoupling. The hint of the leader-based post-launch business model Civ7 is likely to adopt.
Dreadnoughts, or "all big gun" battleships were built by everyone who could physically do it after Britain got theirs in first in 1906.
BUT The Battle Cruiser was a British concept that they nearly monopolized: by my count, from 1906 to 1925 Britain built 16 to Everybody else's 11 (plus 26 that Britain and everybody else planned but never got built between losing WWI and the Washington Naval Limitation Treaty). IF a Modern Age British naval combat unit was desired, it would make a better and more 'British' choice.
Red coats and pith helmets would just about be the last redcoats: they converted to 'dust colored', or khaki for the field uniforms in 1902, and after that kept the 'British scarlet' coats only for parade wear (as in, the guards around Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle)I really want a great engineer/scientist for Britain and a return of the redcoat would be ok IF it’s the late 19th century guys with pith helmets.
@Haig what UU do you think GB should get? i was thinking it would be cool if they got some kind of dragoon/grenadier.
What I meant was that I was hoping for more of an inversion of the typical Japanese civ design. Something more about the culture tree than speeding towards zeros. Something less militaristic.I think that Militaristic, Cultural is more appropriate to the earlier Japanese Ages. Meiji was all about catching up technologically with the West.
The nice thing is it should perform just like those biplanes (with a little more range and better dogfighting)Yeah, I'm a bit leary about the idea of a shiny monocoque all-metal fighter showing up when everyone else has string and balsa-wood biplanes.
If any period of Japan wasn't going to be cultural, it would be Meiji.What I meant was that I was hoping for more of an inversion of the typical Japanese civ design. Something more about the culture tree than speeding towards zeros. Something less militaristic.
Fourth-Age Japan can be Cultural... with Mangaka Great People. Hayao Miyazaki and Shirow Masamune...What I meant was that I was hoping for more of an inversion of the typical Japanese civ design. Something more about the culture tree than speeding towards zeros. Something less militaristic.
Japan and Britain can fight of Kazuo Ishiguro. (I jest. He considers himself English.)Fourth-Age Japan can be Cultural... with Mangaka Great People. Hayao Miyazaki and Shirow Masamune...![]()