What's the point?Well Harappa could be an independent city that will get always razed by barbarians. Same should go with Hitties and Gordian.
What's the point?
There's a reason I took out Hattusha and Gordion.
Alternate history should not be the regular course of the game.
Unpredictability is fun. Scripting history to be alternate is just as boring as scripting it too much to be historical.
Who guarantees if these cities are razed? What if they aren't? Is that supposed to be scripted.
Especially for Harappa it is likely ahistorical for anyone to even get into contact with them.
That's true, but it still requires me to contrive circumstances to make the desired outcome the most likely. Which again, I think is pointless if the desired (i.e. historical) outcome is no interaction with other civs at all.They should be likely razed. I dont see an issue here because whole game is based on "likeness". Rome should likely fall. So should Byzantium as well. Sometimes they do, sometimes not.
I think what is being proposed here are independent cities, not a full fledged civilization.Its pointless. Again. Try create an interesting UHV (Unique Historical Victory) for it. Try design a unique and creative UU, UP and UB. See? Cant. I hope you get my point. Moreover, the only contact between IVC and other civilization thats confirmed,, is with Bactrian Complex afaik. They did not establish contact with Zhou dynasty of China, the Mahajanapadas, or Achaemenid Empire. Making it contacting them is ahistorical.