Can't wait for the modern leaders to do a tiktok transition where they put their hand on the cameraThe personas feel a little too Scooby Doo for my tastes. Xerxes here pulls off a mask and a robe and *GASP* it was Xerxes all along!
Decrease Relationship by a Medium Amount for a player with meddling kids. Increase Relationship by a Medium Amount with players that offer Scooby Snacks?The personas feel a little too Scooby Doo for my tastes. Xerxes here pulls off a mask and a robe and *GASP* it was Xerxes all along!
An accurate description if Ben Franklin is around today.Can't wait for the modern leaders to do a tiktok transition where they put their hand on the camera
exactly OFF to me.Leader looks great!
Persia to Mongolia is a bummer but an expected one.
Why? The Ilkhanate existed. This is an actual transition of ruling class significant regions of the Persian cultural sphere went through in reality. Imho it's exactly the kind of fringe transition options where the system shines. We don't need civ transitions for stacks. We don't need Rome into Siam. Having exactly these kinds of options that represent historic shifts and cultural influences merging is where the system can provide depth and cool switch-ups.Leader looks great!
Persia to Mongolia is a bummer but an expected one.
It's pretty good, except I don't think any dye that vibrantly green was available in the time period. Blue, red, or saffron would be more historical (or purple, of course).I dunno how historically accurate his look is here.
Preorder civs have always been treated as part of the base game, though, just like Monty in Civ6.I'm a bit pissed that you show content that is not in base game for the marketing between that and a whole stream for the Shawnee
Why? The Ilkhanate existed. This is an actual transition of ruling class significant regions of the Persian cultural sphere went through in reality. Imho it's exactly the kind of fringe transition options where the system shines. We don't need civ transitions for stacks. We don't need Rome into Siam. Having exactly these kinds of options that represent historic shifts and cultural influences merging is where the system can provide depth and cool switch-ups.
Green is always a dangerous color for dyes and paints both: most greens are very t ransient, and under any kind of weathering - sunlight, water, etc - will fade or distort in unexpected ways. Green dragoon coats on display at the Musee d' Armee in Paris are either the basic medium green if never exposed, or a dull gray-green or a light acid-apple green, and they all started as the same color. Really bright green as in the graphic shown pretty much had to wait for the aniline chemical dyes of the 19th century, and famously, they used an arsenical base chemical that made them deadly poisonous!It's pretty good, except I don't think any dye that vibrantly green was available in the time period. Blue, red, or saffron would be more historical (or purple, of course).
It's the same leader Ara History Untold picked.....will Firaxis ever acknowledge the Sassanids......I dunno how historically accurate his look is here.
They read the fans comments and thought that Persia could benefit from a non-warmonger leader as well.And why two Personas for Xerxes? Prolly an indication we won't get anymore Persian leaders in Civ7.
It's really not surprising considering Mongolia will also likely go into Qing China, Mughal India, or Russia.Sure it existed for about 80 years, but that’s a blip in most people’s eyes.
Any Asian civ, essentially, could transition into Mongolia by the same logic.
It’s fine, and I understand that this is what you get with ten civs per age at launch.
My think is that is the case, problem is first impression is everything and they used those leaders for the impression.I'm really liking the latest leaders quality, I certainly hope the early ones we saw were just a product of WIP and they are working on having them all look as cool.
Same - this is a contender for my first game.I love his Achaemenid persona.
Almost certainly the leaders we saw before were WIP, but as @TheMarshmallowBear said it was really ill-advised of them to show such clumsy models instead of focusing on polishing a couple up for a good first impression. I'm happy with the last few leaders we've seen, but a lot of angst could have been avoided if the first round of leaders didn't look like they were ripped from Mass Effect 1. (Which is mean. ME1 models looked better than that.)The model looks really good, but I don't like the discrepancy in quality in the leader models
Indeed, light and shader extremely change the final quality of 3D model.(I don't actually know what the issue is with Augustus. When I look at each element separately, like clothing, it doesn't seem that bad... but as a whole, something is off. Is it just lighting or something?)