Yeah I know, what I mean is that the 360 outsold the PS3 despite it being an inferior console because, inter alia, the PS3 was $50 more expensive. Now the PS4 is not only a better console but it's cheaper on launch by $50 and it's got better support for core gamers. So the circumstances under which the 360 outsold the PS3 by 10% simply don't exist now.
Indeed, I don't even think that Microsoft are looking to outsell the PS4 at all. I think they're looking to capture the high margin part of the market and lock them into the MS ecosphere, in the way that Apple have with basically all of their products. They don't care that the low margin customers and core gamers are going to Sony, because a large part of their strategy depends on selling high margin addon services (e.g. TV streaming) to the locked in, high value customers. They're not even creating a games console at all at this point; they rather want to create a complete end-to-end product line where you're using MS products on tablet, desktop, mobile, office and living room. I suspect that their focus on DRM in this new release is less of a sop to games publishers than it is a demonstration to TV, film, music media companies that MS is committed to providing a platform that protects digital products. When you look at the XB1 from MS's perspective, rather than from a gamers' perspective, it all makes perfect sense. I'm simply not Microsoft's target demographic here.
I dunno, that makes sense abstractly, particularly given MS's direction lately, but if everything were to get released as is and stay like this for the rest of the product cycle, the XB1 won't get outsold like the PS3 did, it will get outsold like the original xbox did - that's not the kind of difference they'll be able to make up on margins.
I suspect they got caught off-guard by PS4 pricing, they can't drop their price immediately, or quickly enough to anger the early adopters, but bundling a bunch of games (or just include some really good games with their free xbox live free games deals) and then lowering price ~4 months after launch should be fine.
I don't really agree with the "not a game console" line - they had an actual media version of the XB1 under development that would have done only the media stuff without gaming, but scrapped it. As is, if you use it just for games, and have an internet connection, it's not particularly different than the PS4.
Unless they actually get around to introducing a Netflix-like streaming service that's better/cheaper than Netflix for xbox owners, "proving" anything to media companies is rather pointless - they've already got purchasable movies/tv and streaming music services.
I think now that more and more people already have a Tivo, Roku, whatever-device, tying MS's entertainment device into their console (which they know will have high demand) is how they want to get into that market. That's their real target.
Since I am already far along in my own HTPC ecosystem at home, I will probably pass on the Xbox since I don't need all the bells and whistles.
Tivo, Roku and whatever-device numbers are pathetic compared to consoles though. The PS3 is the top Netflix streaming device, closely followed by the other consoles, after which nothing else is even close.
And really, for anyone that has a console, all the hardware is there already, if the software is present to do TV stuff, what's the point of getting another box for the tv room?
To me the xbox has two major problems that have now backed it into a corner being bullied by sony: kinect and moving towards forced installation.
Kinect alone is the likely reason for the 100 dollar price difference. Problem with kinect though is microsoft knows a lot of its gamer audience simply doesnt care about it. So its put in this weird situation where it really wants kinect to be a big deal, but at the same time they cant really toss it into any of their core games. So its left to do silly things like letting you verbally turn your xbox on. The forced bundling is going to hurt them badly.
I don't get why so many people complain about Kinect, nobody complains about the Wii and Wii U gizmos.
The move towards installation is a problem because that is likely the reason they have to do all this oppressive DRM nonsense since without it you can just install the full game and play without every owning the disc. The main benefit of being able to switch games without switching discs really isnt much of a selling point to counteract the DRM it forced them to toss on.
Downloadable and installable games are awesome, I would never get any console where discs were required.
And playing games from discs is really a terrible usage mode, it just reminds me PC games in the 90s where you had to wait for crap to load from your CD drive between every level.