ParadigmShifter
Random Nonsense Generator
I thought the happiest nations were those that had the least gap between the richest and the poorest?
From what I've gathered, Theige measures happiness on a scale of yachts-owned-by-millionaires.I thought the happiest nations were those that had the least gap between the richest and the poorest?
I thought the happiest nations were those that had the least gap between the richest and the poorest?
What are the statistics we can trust Brian?
I thought the happiest nations were those that had the least gap between the richest and the poorest?
From what I've gathered, Theige measures happiness on a scale of yachts-owned-by-millionaires.
Trust nothing of what you read, half what you see, and remember that official statistics always lie.
And I see that Ireland is just below Venezuela. What correlations do you find in that, I wonder?No, I rely on people who actually measure happiness by, wait for it, asking people how happy they are. It's a truly novel method
And here is the list
No, I rely on people who actually measure happiness by, wait for it, asking people how happy they are. It's a truly novel method
And here is the list
So your opinion is the only one that matters, glad we've gotten that all cleared up.
And I see that Ireland is just below Venezuela. What correlations do you find in that, I wonder?
No, the happiest ones are ruled by Jigme Singye Wangchuck.I thought the happiest nations were those that had the least gap between the richest and the poorest?
And Yemen. And pretty-much-everywhere-he-wants.So, Obama-murders-anyone-he-wants land is Pakistan and Afghanistan? Not snarking, just asking a question.
"the alchemists of capitalism" Waaahat??? Let's be a bit more clear here, shall we? The prize is given out by the Swedish Central Bank. What does that have to do with free enterprise?Probably why it doesn't get one- the "Swedish National Bank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel" isn't actually one of the Nobel Prizes, people have just been mislead into thinking it is, and the alchemists of capitalism aren't about to contradict them.
And here is the list
No It's about being of the best supporters of lies. The foundation of the state is lies. "Respected" economists promulgate state-supporting lies. The main lie in this domain is the idea that printing money somehow causes economic growth.Isn't being one of the most respected economists in the world like being one of the best astrologers/tea-leaf readers in the world?
Because individual satisfaction is not determined by general consumption? Especially not when so much Western consumption is driven by manufactured desires consciously engineered to be insatiable...How can countries that consume less than half of other countries thrive more, enigma?
No It's about being of the best supporters of lies. The foundation of the state is lies. "Respected" economists promulgate state-supporting lies. The main lie in this domain is the idea that printing money somehow causes economic growth.
Printing money benefits those who print it. Us ordinary folk lose because our money gets diluted. This is not complicated.
No It's about being of the best supporters of lies. The foundation of the state is lies. "Respected" economists promulgate state-supporting lies. The main lie in this domain is the idea that printing money somehow causes economic growth.
Printing money benefits those who print it. Us ordinary folk lose because our money gets diluted. This is not complicated.
As long as it's not the USA, who cares?And Yemen. And pretty-much-everywhere-he-wants.
No, I rely on people who actually measure happiness by, wait for it, asking people how happy they are. It's a truly novel method