salty mud
Deity
Big Brother.
yes yes half life 1998 too and its mods, and the first mmorpgs etc.
dude, the mid 90's were the start of internet gaming, it developed fast, so 1 year here or there changes a lot.
none of you have still pointed out 1996(and first half at that) games that are still as popular.
(hint, dont look for 3d games. quake was the first popular online one)
I was thinking along the lines of sniper on defense for one of the linear maps. (eg dustbowl)
quake uses the master server principle too.While we're playing that game, how about we limit it to only games released in May, hmm? That's nothing but an aversion tactic. Quake has been blown out of the water and nobody but you plays it anymore. Starcraft's battle.net was absolutely revolutionary, btw, and did far more for internet gaming than Quake ever could.
diablo isnt played as much as quake(yes ive played both online this year). my criteria was online games. nintendo games are rarely played online(through emolution)Also, I have a few words for you:
Diablo
Resident Evil
Super Mario 64 (This one alone is played more than Quake and isn't even multiplayer. I guarentee it.)
C&C: Red Alert
no doubt doom must be respected. but it wasnt an internet gaming, the first popular full3d shooter game, revolution like quake was, first popular opengl supporting game.All are far better and have had a more lasting impact on gaming (hence, things like non-sucky sequels), which screws your TF2 argument. If you want to play the "respect your elders" card, all I have to say is Doom.
played it for 5 years. competitive. but doesnt demand anywhere near the amount of skills quake does.If you want to find a competitive FPS, play CounterStrike.
hard to trace fast moving dots.Since when does fastest mean most skill?
quake uses the master server principle too.
diablo isnt played as much as quake(yes ive played both online this year).
my criteria was online games. nintendo games are rarely played online(through emolution)
no doubt doom must be respected. but it wasnt an internet gaming, the first popular full3d shooter game, revolution like quake was, first popular opengl supporting game.
played it for 5 years. competitive. but doesnt demand anywhere near the amount of skills quake does.
quake is STILL the fastest fps.
ironically, cs, in its early beta days with faster movement was far more demanding than after retail launch when it became a real competitive fenomenon.
ok, ill requalify as online game from 1900 to 1996.Not part of your actual "challenge", but even granted that you've qualified what Quake is the best of so much that it's meaningless. "Best online game from the first half of 2006?" Laughable.
my point isnt to force my taste on fps's onto thers, just show that claiming that 50 people simultaniously still playing it is laughable is an ignorant statement, considering the era of the game and its pioneering status.
appeal to authorityNo, I'm pretty sure the number of people who play each game is pretty indicative that your initial claims of superiority for Quake and the supporting reasons epic fail.
Whether it had an impact on gaming is an entirely seperate matter, and trying to blur the lines is ridiculous at best.
I actually read all of it. I hope someone does something very painful to you.
I actually read all of it. I hope someone does something very painful to you.
That's not so much a rant as it is a
appeal to authority