Traitorfish
The Tighnahulish Kid
I don't think that's true, or why you would think that it's true.I don't know, if you want to break down radical feminists like that, you have to do the same with Incels. Because if we're that exact, then most Incels are also not men who cannot get laid, but rather men who have standards that above what they can afford with their own appearance. Pretty much any man can get laid by that random low-iq, overweight female who wants to really have a baby and is willing to sleep with just about anyone.
And if we do that, then radical feminists don't sound that dissimilar anymore, as they too are mostly women who couldn't find a partner that they liked, and then they got feminists, and managed to get some low self-esteem men to like their toes, and many used that change to get a boy-toy for themselves.
I don't even know what the purpose of this analogy is. To delegitimise radical feminism, a movement which hasn't been politically or culturally relevant for twenty years? To legitimise Incels, a movement characterised less by activism than by spree-killings? To get one over on the Ivory Tower liberals of CFC?
Last edited: