Article is paywalled, but simply...in defiance of UN sanctions that Russia voted for, Russia is selling oil to North Korea, most likely in exchange for ammunition.
I quoted the article below.
For anyone who wants to read paywalled news articles, there are browser extensions to bypass them, for example:
https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-chrome-clean
https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-firefox-clean

Russia supplies oil to North Korea as UN sanctions regime nears ‘collapse’​


Christian Davies

5–6 minutes




Russia has started supplying oil directly to North Korea in defiance of UN sanctions, further cementing ties between the two authoritarian regimes and dealing a new blow to international efforts to contain Pyongyang.

At least five North Korean tankers travelled this month to collect oil products from Vostochny Port in Russia’s Far East, according to satellite images shared with the Financial Times by the Royal United Services Institute, a UK think-tank.

The shipments, which began on March 7, are the first documented direct seaborne deliveries from Russia since the UN Security Council — with Moscow’s approval — imposed a strict cap on oil transfers in 2017 in response to Pyongyang’s nuclear weapons tests.

“These oil deliveries constitute a full-frontal assault against the sanctions regime, which is now on the brink of collapse,” said Hugh Griffiths, a former co-ordinator of the UN panel that monitors sanctions on North Korea.

The vessels, which are North Korean-flagged and classified as oil products tankers, all visited the same berth operated by a Russian oil company at Vostochny Port, where they appeared to load.

Satellite imagery confirmed that two of the ships then travelled from Vostochny Port to the North Korean port of Chongjin, where they appeared to unload.

“The vessels we’ve seen at Russian terminals are some of the largest-capacity vessels in North Korea’s fleet, and the vessels are continually sailing in and out of the port,” said Joseph Byrne, a research fellow at Rusi. “Several of these vessels are also UN-designated, meaning they shouldn’t even be allowed entry into foreign ports, let alone involved in oil deliveries.”

The deliveries come after North Korea last August began supplying thousands of containers of munitions to Russia, which military experts argue have made a significant contribution to Moscow’s war effort in Ukraine. According to Rusi, Vostochny Port has also been used as a hub for Russian ships allegedly involved in arms trade between the countries.

“What we can see now is a clear arms-for-oil bartering arrangement in open contravention of sanctions that [Russian President] Vladimir Putin signed off on personally, illustrating Russia’s trajectory in recent years from international spoiler to outlaw state,” said Griffiths.

[IMG alt="A map showing Russia and North Korea. Satellite imagery indicates that the vessel Paek Yang San 1 sailed to the North Korean port of Chongjin after loading oil in Vostochny"]https://www.ft.com/__origami/servic...le-down&quality=highest&width=700&dpr=1[/IMG]

All five of the North Korean ships made the journeys to Vostochny Port with their transponders switched off. One of those vessels, the Paek Yang San 1, was identified by the UN as having been involved in illicit ship-to-ship oil transfers designed to circumvent the import cap, which restricts North Korea to just 500,000 barrels a year each for oil and petroleum products. Deliveries can also only be deemed compliant if they are reported to a UN sanctions committee.

Rusi researchers calculated that the oil deliveries documented from Vostochny Port could amount to 125,000 barrels of oil products — a quarter of the permitted annual quota — in a matter of weeks.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov declined to comment. The operators of the North Korean ships could not be reached for comment.
The revelation of the apparent oil-for-arms trade comes as western diplomats are rushing to preserve the UN panel that monitors compliance with sanctions on North Korea, amid fears that Russia could veto a renewal of the body’s mandate, according to three people familiar with discussions at the UN in New York.

Western officials postponed a vote on renewing the expert panel last week after Russia and China made proposals to water down its mandate, the people said.

The deliberations over the UN sanctions panel, which were first reported by Seoul-based news service NK News, have raised questions about how long the UN body — and the sanctions regime itself — can survive.

“While there is a debate about the effectiveness of sanctions, what we are now seeing is what would start to happen if the sanctions were removed,” said Byrne. “This is giving North Korea a very significant lift.”

Go Myong-hyun, a senior research fellow at South Korea’s state-affiliated Institute for National Security Strategy think-tank, said direct supplies of oil and petroleum products from Russia to North Korea would “go a long way towards stabilising the North Korean economy”.

“For the past seven years, Pyongyang has had to pay a high premium for the oil products it needs, as it relied on a complex and expensive network of criminal brokers and mid-sea ship-to-ship transfers,” said Go.

“But now, it appears it has secured a steady supply of oil either at a heavy discount or as direct payment for the munitions it is supplying to Moscow,” he added. “That is going to free up resources for North Korea’s armed forces and its nuclear weapons programme.”

Additional reporting by Polina Ivanova in Berlin
 
It seems Russia completely stopped caring about the optics.
Recently there’s been visibly more Russian special forces/military with very obvious swastika patches in officially publicized videos. This one is FSB (source https://ntv.ru/video/2319734 at 1:55).
No wonder why Russian patriots always refuse to explain what the "good cause" of the war they started was.

1711482311474.png
 
It seems Putin's narrative regarding the Ukraine link to the Isis terrorist attack in Moscow, has now been completely shot down by none other that Belarus President Lukashenko.

President Lukashenko claims Belarus and Russian security prevented Moscow shooting suspects from entering Belarus.
Lukashenko said the suspects "took a turn" from attempting to enter Belarus.


https://www.businessinsider.nl/bela...us-claims-that-ukraine-backed-isis-attackers/

Lukashenko claims that Putin was informed all the way, which means Putin lied when he addressed the Russian people via his tv statement in which he never mentioned that the terrorists were originally headed for the Belarus border. What a surprise.
 
Last edited:
It seems Putin's narrative regarding the Ukraine link to the Isis terrorist attack in Moscow, has now been completely shot down by none other that Belarus President Lukashenko.

President Lukashenko claims Belarus and Russian security prevented Moscow shooting suspects from entering Belarus.
Lukashenko said the suspects "took a turn" from attempting to enter Belarus.


https://www.businessinsider.nl/bela...us-claims-that-ukraine-backed-isis-attackers/

Lukashenko claims that Putin was informed all the way, which means Putin lied when he addressed the Russian people via his tv statement in which he never mentioned that the terrorists were originally headed for the Belarus border. What a surprise.
Going to Ukraine through mostly unguarded Belarus border was the safest route. There's no contradiction with what Putin said.
 
France sending 78 Caesar Howitzers to Ukraine.

Is this system a bit like HIMARS; fire and quickly move to a new position to avoid counterfire?
 
France sending 78 Caesar Howitzers to Ukraine.

Is this system a bit like HIMARS; fire and quickly move to a new position to avoid counterfire?

Yes and no.

Based on mobility, but HIMARS are safer as they have a longer range. They can move away fast enough to avoid direct counter-fire but IIRC Ukraine has lost 5 or 6 CAESAR to drones, while the HIMARS are outside the drones range (but one may have been lost to a missile recently)
 
Last edited:
France sending 78 Caesar Howitzers to Ukraine.

Is this system a bit like HIMARS; fire and quickly move to a new position to avoid counterfire?
Not really.
HIMARS are long-range rocket launcher, which are mainly used for deep strikes.
CAESAR are high-precision artillery, which are mainly used as counter-battery.

80 is a pretty significant number (IIRC we gave a total of 24 up to now to Ukraine, so that's a sudden increase by a factor of four). Maybe Macron is finally starting to actually act rather than just speak ? One can hope.
 
Some key point of the French MoD press conference


  • confirmation of some equipment productions on Ukraine's territory by the Franco-German KNDS Group (primarily for maintenance of some vehicles already given to Ukraine)
  • plan to adapt the French HAMMER (Highly Agile Modular Munition Extended Range) kit for 250kg bombs for the F-16 (they've already been adapted for Mig-29 / Su-27 which are currently using them)
  • better coordination for cyber-defense
  • confirmation of the 78 CAESAR for 2024, with a participation of Denmark (and Ukraine) for financing them
  • recycling of old munition for gunpowder (production/acquisition of which is a slowing point for production of shells) to reach 100,000 155mm shells in 2024 (still far from being enough, but x3 from 2022-2023)
  • reminding that requisition of "personnel, inventory or production tools" may be possible to speed up production of military equipment for the French army and Ukraine.
 
Seems this Czech (and Danish et al) initiative to scrounge up more 155mm ammo for Ukraine on the world market might work out even better than expected.
 
Nice, those 80 Caesars can fire very quickly and are going to need lots of food. Also read somewhere Spain is preparing 20 additional stored Leos which a year ago were in too bad shape to be prepared.
Maybe USA stupid paralysis is going to be useful for Europe to get out of its estupor and wake up
 
Last edited:

Exclusive: Russia struggles to collect oil payments as China, UAE, Turkey raise bank scrutiny​

MOSCOW, March 27 (Reuters) - Russian oil firms face delays of up to several months to be paid for crude and fuel as banks in China, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) become more wary of U.S. secondary sanctions, eight sources familiar with the matter said.
Payment delays reduce revenue to the Kremlin and make them erratic, allowing Washington to achieve its dual policy sanction goals - to disrupt money going to the Kremlin to punish it for the war in Ukraine while not interrupting global energy flows.

Several banks in China, the UAE and Turkey have boosted their sanctions compliance requirements in recent weeks, resulting in delays or even the rejection of money transfers to Moscow, according to the eight banking and trading sources.
Banks, cautious of the U.S. secondary sanctions, started to ask their clients to provide written guarantees that no person or entity from the U.S. SDN (Special Designated Nationals) list is involved in a deal or is a beneficiary of a payment.

The sources asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the issue and because they are not allowed to speak to media.
In the UAE, banks First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) and Dubai Islamic Bank (DIB) have suspended several accounts linked to the trading of Russian goods, two sources said.
UAE's Mashreq bank, Turkey's Ziraat and Vakifbank and Chinese banks ICBC and Bank of China still process payments but take weeks or months to process them, four sources said.

Mashreq bank declined to comment. UAE's FAB and DIB banks, Turkey's Ziraat and Vakifbank, China's ICBC and Bank of China did not reply to requests for comments.
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said payment problems exist when asked about reports that banks in China have slowed payments.
"Of course, unprecedented pressure from the United States and the European Union on the People's Republic of China continues," Peskov told a daily conference call with reporters.

"This, of course, creates certain problems, but cannot become an obstacle to the further development of our trade and economic relations (with China)," Peskov said.

U.S. EXECUTIVE ORDER​

The West has imposed a multitude of sanctions on Russia after it invaded Ukraine in February 2022. Dealing with Russian oil is not illegal as long as it is sold below a Western-imposed price cap of $60 per barrel.
Russian oil exports and payments for it have been disrupted in the first months of the war but later normalised as Moscow re-routed flows to Asia and Africa away from Europe.

"Problems returned from December after banks and companies have realised the threat of U.S. secondary sanctions is real," one trading source said.
The source was referring to a U.S. Treasury executive order
, opens new tab published on Dec. 22, 2023, which warned it could apply sanctions for the evasion of the Russian price cap on foreign banks and called on them to boost compliance.
It became the first direct warning about a possibility of secondary sanctions on Russia, putting it on par with Iran in some areas of trade.
Following the U.S. order, Chinese, UAE and Turkish banks that work with Russia have increased checks, started asking for extra documentation and trained more staff to make sure deals were compliant with the price cap, the trading sources said.
Additional documents can also include details on the ownership of all companies involved in the deal and personal data of individuals controlling the entities, so that banks can check on any exposure to the SDN list.
In the end of February UAE banks had to rise payment scrutiny as they were asked to provide data to the U.S. correspondent banks and the U.S. treasury if they have transactions that go to China on behalf of a Russian entity, according to one banking source familiar with the matter.
"This meant delays in processing payments to Russia," one of the sources said.
One source said one payment had been delayed by two months, while another said the delays amounted to two to three weeks.
"It has become tough and not even for the dollar transactions. Sometimes it takes weeks for a direct yuan-rouble transaction to be executed," one of the traders said.
Good news?
 

Lukashenko says concert hall attackers first headed for Belarus, contradicting Putin​

LONDON, March 26 (Reuters) - Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko said on Tuesday that the gunmen who attacked Moscow's Crocus City Hall music venue on Friday tried initially to flee to Belarus, not Ukraine as Russian officials including President Vladimir Putin have insisted.
Putin said Ukraine had prepared a "window" for the attackers to cross the border - currently a war zone.
Ukraine has vehemently denied involvement but two of Putin's most powerful allies, Security Council chairman Nikolai Patrushev and FSB state security service head Alexander Bortnikov, on Tuesday both directly blamed Kyiv for the attack, albeit without producing any evidence.

However, Lukashenko, a close ally of Putin, told journalists that Belarusian and Russian security services had coordinated their actions as the suspects' car fled southwest from Moscow to the Bryansk region, bordering both Ukraine and Belarus, where it was apprehended.
He said Belarus had quickly set up checkpoints at the border.
“That’s why they couldn’t enter Belarus. They saw that, so they turned away and went to the area of the Ukrainian-Russian border,” he was quoted as saying by the state news agency BelTA.

"Putin and I didn't sleep for a day," he added. "... There was constant interaction."Bortnikov said Russia knew that Ukraine had been training Islamist militants in the Middle East.
U.S. officials have said the United States has intelligence confirming Islamic State's claim of responsibility for the attack. Putin himself has acknowledged that Islamist militants carried it out, but says he wants to know who ordered it.
LOL
 
there was this one also, I don't remember if it was already posted:

evacuation of a wounded drone :borg:

 

Ukraine is in a race to stop Russia's mounting glide-bomb attacks​

  • Russia has relied heavily on glide-bomb strikes to target Ukrainian positions this year.
  • This tactic shows Russia's air force has adapted to its own limitations, war experts told BI.
  • Without more air-defense capabilities from the West, Ukraine is facing a grim outlook.
Russia has increasingly relied on glide-bomb strikes to hammer Ukrainian defenses while keeping its attack aircraft mostly out of harm's way.

It's a devastating tactic that underscores Russia's ability to adapt to some of the problems that have hamstrung its forces, and one that has helped Moscow secure recent battlefield victories. Glide bombs allow the Russians to blast fortified positions from ranges well beyond artillery without exposing their aircraft to Ukraine's surface-to-air missiles, and what Russia lacks in accuracy it makes up for in sheer firepower. These bombs can weigh up to 6,600 pounds.

Ukraine has also proven that it struggles to easily defeat this threat largely due to a shortage of air defense missiles. And while it continues to expend precious air-defense resources, and additional Western military aid remains out of reach, war experts say Kyiv may end up losing more ground and experienced troops.

"Russia's employment of glide bombs is really underscoring the extent to which the Russian military is still dangerous," George Barros, the geospatial-intelligence team lead and a Russia analyst at the Institute for the Study of War, told Business Insider.
"They're still learning" and coming up with solutions, he said, enabling Russian forces to advance despite some of the issues they've had with positional and trench warfare in the past.

Operating over Ukraine with 'impunity'​

Glide bombs have flight control surfaces and are standoff weapons, meaning that attacking aircraft can release them at a distance from a target instead of directly above it (unlike conventional gravity bombs), which helps reduce the aircraft's exposure to enemy air defenses.

Short flight times, small radar signatures, and non-ballistic trajectories make glide bombs particularly difficult to intercept as well. And while Ukraine has warned throughout the war that these munitions can cause serious problems, the past few months have proven this concern to be especially true.

"Russian forces have significantly increased guided and unguided glide-bomb strikes against rear and frontline Ukrainian positions in 2024, notably employing mass glide-bomb strikes to tactical effect in their seizure of Avdiivka in mid-February," analysts at the ISW think tank wrote in an assessment last week.

Advanced air-defense systems on both sides kept the skies above Ukraine contested for the first two years of the war. But as Russian ground troops closed in on Avdiivka, a small city in eastern Ukraine's Donetsk region, Moscow's air force managed to barrage Ukrainian defensive positions that supported a major breakthrough.

With the Russian air force able to strike targets for its ground forces that artillery couldn't reach, Ukraine reported an uptick in glide-bomb strikes in the dying days of its Adviivka defense. Ultimately, Moscow captured the war-torn city, marking its biggest victory in nearly a year.

The Russians are getting better at understanding how the timing and volume of its large strike packages can be delivered to Ukrainian cities and critical infrastructure in a way that best exhausts Kyiv's air-defense bandwidth, Barros said.

"When the Ukrainian air-defense bandwidth is all tied up, they then move in with the fixed-wing aircraft to conduct these glide-bomb attacks," he said. "If Ukraine had better air defenses, they might be able to preclude the use of glide bombs by forcing the fixed-wing aircraft to stay further away from the front line."

Can Ukraine avoid losing ground?​

Russian aircraft have already dropped over 3,500 bombs on Ukrainian positions nearly three months into 2024, Ukrainian Deputy Minister of Defense Lt. Gen. Ivan Gavrylyuk wrote in a March 18 op-ed for state-run news agency Ukrinform. This is much higher than the previous year, he said.

But despite this high rate of fire, it doesn't look like there will be a shortage of glide bombs in the Russian arsenal anytime soon.

Last week, Moscow's defense ministry said production of several munitions types is increasing. This includes the 1,100-pound FAB-500, 3,300-pound FAB-1500, and 6,600-pound FAB-3000 bombs — all of which can be modified and turned into glide bombs.

"What the Russians are doing here is they're reinforcing a success," Barros said. In other words, Moscow found a tactic that works, so it's rapidly scaling up production of these munitions.

Many of the Russian glide bombs are being released up to 30 miles or farther behind the front lines, making it difficult for Ukraine to engage these aircraft with nearly all its air-defense systems beyond the US-made MIM-104 Patriot system, Justin Bronk, an airpower expert at the Royal United Services Institute think tank, told BI.

Glide bombs are only capable of hitting fixed or stationary targets, meaning they're particularly impactful in areas that have seen long-term fighting, like in Avdiivka, where Ukrainian positions are relatively easy to spot, Bronk said.

"That makes the mission planning for attacks with standoff weapons that can hit fixed targets, like the glide bombs, quite practical," he explained. "They contain a lot more explosive — particularly the 1,500-kilogram variants — than artillery or rocket artillery shells."

Because of this, he said, there's a "qualitative psychological impact that is greater, in many ways, than artillery."

Ultimately, to help mitigate the glide-bomb threat, the experts said, Ukraine needs a significant boost in air-defense interceptors — in tandem with artillery ammunition — from its Western backers.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has repeatedly said that Kyiv's existing arsenal of air-defense capabilities is not enough to protect the country from unrelenting bombardments, frequently calling on his partners to provide more support.

But Republican lawmakers in Congress have yet to end their months-long hold on additional funding to Ukraine, which would unlock much-needed military aid, including air-defense capabilities and munitions like Patriot missiles, for the country.

The White House on Friday said it's "critical" that the US provide Ukraine with more air-defense assets.

Russia's glide bombs alone will not necessarily determine the war, the experts said, as Moscow also enjoys a major artillery advantage. But this trend, combined with Ukraine's diminishing resources and uncertainty over the future of Western security assistance, is making the battlefield outlook increasingly grim for Kyiv.

"Without the US passing the aid supplemental, it's very difficult to see how the Ukrainians can avoid continuing to lose ground —potentially catastrophically — when it comes to the Russian major offensive in the summer, which will come," Bronk said.

Barros agreed that if Ukraine doesn't get a resupply of weaponry, it will ultimately concede territory. And it won't be entirely the fault of glide bombs — Kyiv needs all the tools its forces can get right now.

"If all things keep the same and the Russians keep with their current pattern of innovation and adaptation, we have no reason to doubt that the Russian air force will become more involved in this war and bring more forces to bear," he said, "which will ultimately affect the ground domain reality."

 
Several European investigations shed light on the global and interconnected nature of ISIS finances, according to a United Nations report in January, which identified Turkey as a logistical hub for ISIS-K operations in Europe.

The Moscow and Iran attacks demonstrated more sophistication, counterterrorism officials said, suggesting a greater level of planning and an ability to tap into local extremist networks.
“ISIS-K has been fixated on Russia for the past two years,” frequently criticizing President Vladimir V. Putin in its propaganda, said Colin P. Clarke, a counterterrorism analyst at the Soufan Group, a security consulting firm based in New York. “ISIS-K accuses the Kremlin of having Muslim blood in its hands, referencing Moscow’s interventions in Afghanistan, Chechnya and Syria.”

(the above is from: )

 

More than 1,600 European planes hit by mystery GPS jamming with Russia feared responsible​


Planes flying over and around the Baltic Sea in northern Europe have been suffering technical problems caused by jamming since Sunday, with 1614 planes, mostly civilian, reporting problems since then.

Such interference poses serious issues for pilots, as it can force them to contend with fake signals that give false information about the plane’s position in the sky.

A map posted on X by an open-source intelligence account that tracks interference shows incidents widely spread across Poland and southern Sweden.

Most of the incidents appear to be taking place in Polish airspace, OSINT blogs have reported that planes flying in German, Danish, Swedish, Latvian and Lithuanian airspace have suffered interference problems.

Notably, little to no interference appears to be taking place in Belarus, a staunch Russian ally, or Kaliningrad, the Russian province separated from the mainland by sea and land.

A Lithuanian defense official told Newsweek: "Russian armed forces have a wide spectrum of military equipment dedicated for GNSS interference, including jamming and spoofing, at varying distances, duration and intensity.

"Those capabilities are used to create an ‘atmosphere of threat and a sense of helplessness in society", a Polish Defense Ministry official said.

A Lithuanian defense source told the outlet: "Russian armed forces have a wide spectrum of military equipment dedicated for GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) interference, including jamming and spoofing, at varying distances, duration and intensity."

A leading military expert said that Russia's dominance in the electronics war should be a 'wake-up call' for the UK's military.

 
Top Bottom