Santorum drops out of the race.

Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
9,718
If there has already been a thread over this, I apologize and please close this. Otherwise:

"In a surprise decision Tuesday, former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) announced that he is suspending his presidential campaign, all but putting an end to the Republican primary.

"We made a decision to get into this race at our kitchen table, against all the odds, and we made a decision over the weekend that while this presidential race is over for me, and we will suspend our campaign effective today, we are not done fighting," Santorum said during an address in Gettysburg, Pa.

During his 14-minute speech, Santorum notably did not endorse Mitt Romney.

The Pennsylvania Republican had taken a break from the campaign trail for several days to tend to his ailing daughter, Bella. He had pledged to continue campaigning through the upcoming Pennsylvania primary. But the combination of his daughter's sickness and recent poll numbers showing him possibly losing his home state apparently prompted the early departure.

According to Yahoo! News, Santorum called Romney earlier in the day to inform him of his decision to suspend his campaign. The former senator also made a call to campaign operatives to relay his decision.

Santorum's decision removes any lingering doubt that Romney will end up the Republican presidential nominee. The former Massachusetts governor held a seemingly insurmountable delegate lead prior to Santorum's departure, though his campaign was planning on spending between one and two million dollars against Santorum in Pennsylvania.

UPDATE: 2:35 p.m. -- RNC Chairman Reince Priebus has responded to Santorum's decision:

"Today, Senator Santorum has made a commendable decision. He has decided to put his country, party, and desire to defeat President Obama ahead of any personal ambition. I applaud his decision and congratulate him on the campaign he has run."
The Romney campaign has also released a statement:

"Senator Santorum is an able and worthy competitor, and I congratulate him on the campaign he ran. He has proven himself to be an important voice in our party and in the nation. We both recognize that what is most important is putting the failures of the last three years behind us and setting America back on the path to prosperity."
Newt Gingrich weighed in during a press conference on Tuesday:

"I think it makes it clearer that there's a conservative, named Newt Gingrich, and there's Mitt Romney," he said, according to Justin Sink of The Hill. "I have a great, great respect for how hard Rick worked, he was the personification of courage."

UPDATE 3:10 p.m. -- Shortly after the senator finished speaking, Santorum spokesman Hogan Gidley explained the decision in a short phone interview with the Huffington Post. The senator came to the conclusion that he should suspend his campaign last night, Gidley said, noting that while his decision was largely driven by concerns over Bella's illness, there were political factors as well.

Cash was always a problem, though Gidley said that the campaign was "okay with money." Gingrich's presence in the primary also presented obstacles.

"We needed Newt to step aside a long time ago," Gidley had told MSNBC earlier.

But one of the lesser-discussed concerns was the structure of Texas' primary. Santorum had been pushing to have delegates assigned on a winner-take-all basis, but it increasingly appeared that his demands would not be met.

"Texas had to be winner take all," said Gidley. "That would have been very, very helpful. Obviously, that is 155 delegates sitting on the table, and we know there have been some ... within the conservative movement trying to get that accomplished. But that was becoming increasingly difficult."

Asked how much should be read into the absence of Romney's name from Santorum's speech, Gidley replied: "nothing."

"Governor Romney has called Rick and asked for a meeting to discuss an endorsement," he explained, "but we will see how that goes in the next couple days."

UPDATE 4:20 p.m. -- Obama campaign manager Jim Messina has issued a statement on Santorum's move:

“It’s no surprise that Mitt Romney finally was able to grind down his opponents under an avalanche of negative ads. But neither he nor his special interest allies will be able to buy the presidency with their negative attacks. The more the American people see of Mitt Romney, the less they like him and the less they trust him. While calling himself the ‘ideal candidate’ for the Tea Party, he has promised to return to the same policies that created the economic crisis and has alienated women, middle class families, and Hispanic Americans. Americans value a President who will fight every day to rebuild an economy in which hard work will pay, responsibility is rewarded and everyone plays by the same rules. And that President is Barack Obama.”

and that was taken from huffington post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/10/rick-santorum-drops-out-2012-race_n_1415372.html

My personal thoughts are that Santorum is doing this because he realizes he can't win, NOT for the love of the Republican party. In other words, he's not doing this to help Romney beat Obama. If anything, Santorum wants Obama to win. This is because of Romney wins, Santorum can't run again in 2016.

This is 100% personal gain on Santorum's part, not "love for the republican party".

As for the statement released by the Obama campaign manager, that's laughable. And that's coming from an Obama supporter (me).

I mean, criticizing someone by saying "you're campaign is way too negative" has irony written all over it. In other words, this statement from the Obama campaign is a negative attack in itself. I'm not saying the Obama campaign, (or any campaign for that matter) should not be allowed to make negative attacks. It's just a part of politics. However, don't be hilariously ironic about it.

I am almost 100% certain that Santorum will endorse Romney, but that's because doing so makes him look good, not because he really wants Romney to win.

the bottom line: Rick Santorum is a relatively young politician. Just because he lost this race doesn't mean he's going away for good.
 
There's a thread in the other section for this. If you want to discuss it separately, this would be OK.

Santorum is just recognizing the inevitable here. After the last set of primaries, mathematically it is essentially impossible for him to win.
 
Eh, I'm not even sure I want Romney to win. It would be more of the same, and we DEFINITELY won't get anything better in 2016.

I've been supporting Dr. Paul for awhile, but Rick Santorum would have been my No. 2. The very thought of Gingrich or Romney honestly makes me gag a little.

Then again, I can't outright support Obama.

Good luck third parties!
 
Newt, on the other hand, will probably stick it out to the end.

My question to Newt, is why. If even Santorum is dropping out, what does Newt possibly have to gain?
 
Santorum did a good job, I think if he tried harder he could have defeated Romney, but this was the right move on his part. Newt, on the other hand, will probably stick it out to the end.

Tried harder? What could he have done? You don't think he tried?
 
Tried harder? What could he have done? You don't think he tried?

Agreed. Romney out spent Santorum by quite a margin. I don't think Santorum ever had a chance to begin with. The fact that he faired as well as he did however, proves that he is quite a resourceful politician and one that will certainly run again in the future.
 
Tried harder? What could he have done? You don't think he tried?

Maybe convinced Newt to drop out? Their policy positions aren't THAT far apart and Santorum has the better moral record. That said, I doubt that would have worked.

Where the rest of you squabble over whether the Democrats are left or right, I'm wondering when we'll get a candidate who's right-wing and libertarian enough that I can actually support them.

I can't vote, but if I could, I wouldn't give Romney my vote.

Consider me a frustrated future voter that hopes he can actually vote meaningfully in 2016.
 
Maybe convinced Newt to drop out? Their policy positions aren't THAT far apart and Santorum has the better moral record. That said, I doubt that would have worked.

Where the rest of you squabble over whether the Democrats are left or right, I'm wondering when we'll get a candidate who's right-wing and libertarian enough that I can actually support them.

I can't vote, but if I could, I wouldn't give Romney my vote.

Consider me a frustrated future voter that hopes he can actually vote meaningfully in 2016.

In this case, then logically you would want Obama to win this time 'round. If Romney wins, then when you can vote, you'll be stuck with Romney who you won't like. And his democratic challenger won't be any more "right wing" I'm afraid.
 
In this case, then logically you would want Obama to win this time 'round. If Romney wins, then when you can vote, you'll be stuck with Romney who you won't like. And his democratic challenger won't be any more "right wing" I'm afraid.

That's the logic I'm mulling over. Here's the thing, I'm not going to argue here over where the center is, but compared to each other, they're definitely almost the same. The question is this, I know Romney doesn't believe in conservatism at all, but will he act like he does in office, or will he just be the same as he was in Massachusettes? If the Romney we're getting is the one we got in Massachusettes, I want nothing to do with him. If, on the other hand, we'll get a conservative government, even if its close to the center,I would rather him win than Obama.

I guess at the moment I don't really much care. If Romney wins and rules like a conservative (Again, even if a very moderate one, as long as we're moving in the same direction, even if its a lot slower than I want) I'd vote for him in 2016, if not (Assuming nothing dramatically changes in the Democratic party) I'd vote third party, and I don't feel the least bit remorseful about "Wasting a vote."
 
This is very sad news, but I'm looking forward to seeing the next batpoop nutjob Republican to sneak out and give us all a good laugh.
 
Dammit, I'm running out of good American comedy.
 
Agreed. Romney out spent Santorum by quite a margin. I don't think Santorum ever had a chance to begin with. The fact that he faired as well as he did however, proves that he is quite a resourceful politician and one that will certainly run again in the future.
Looks like the Citizen's United ruling has paid off for the GOP establishment.
 
I'm sad. Now our only sources for comic relief this election, unless Mittens goes off the deep end with VP choice is the Gringo and Biden Bloopers, along with Mittens trying to pretend he isn't a robot.
 
This is excellent news.

Romney is mundane, at best. Santorum was downright scary.
 
I was concerned that Mr. Santorum would pull a "Clinton" - where Hilary continued with her campaign long after she had been mathematically eliminated and dealt it into the top cabinet position at the convention. Mr. Santorum's comment that' "...we are not done fighting," is a bit disturbing though.
 
Eh, I'm not even sure I want Romney to win. It would be more of the same, and we DEFINITELY won't get anything better in 2016.

I've been supporting Dr. Paul for awhile, but Rick Santorum would have been my No. 2. The very thought of Gingrich or Romney honestly makes me gag a little.

Then again, I can't outright support Obama.

Good luck third parties!
More of the same?
So, you think that Romney would nominate the same judges for the Supreme Court? Some expect the next term to have 3 seats opening up.

And the numerous federal judges... the same as Obama from Romney?

That by itself is a major difference. If you really think it's more of the same, you aren't looking into it closely enough.

And, voting for a 3rd party... that just means you've taken yourself out of the election in order to prove that you hold your ideals more important than the direction of the country... which will be decided. The option to turn may not be as hard of a right turn as you like, but it certainly isn't the same path as Obama...
 
More of the same?
So, you think that Romney would nominate the same judges for the Supreme Court? Some expect the next term to have 3 seats opening up.

And the numerous federal judges... the same as Obama from Romney?

That by itself is a major difference. If you really think it's more of the same, you aren't looking into it closely enough.

I'm thinking more about what their political positions than who they'll pick, Romney will have to toe the line I'm sure.

And, voting for a 3rd party... that just means you've taken yourself out of the election in order to prove that you hold your ideals more important than the direction of the country... which will be decided. The option to turn may not be as hard of a right turn as you like, but it certainly isn't the same path as Obama...

Even if I could vote... I live in New York anyway, there's no way a Republican is going to win there, and if they do, they don't need my help:p

But seriously, I can deal with it not being as hard of a right turn as I like. What I question is whether he's going to turn us right at all, or whther he'll just turn us to a slightly more centrist left position (In American terms, so I don't care if the Europeans think Obama himself is right:p) He flips so often I don't even know what he believes, or what he'll do.

If he'll rule as a conservative, even if he isn't one, I can live with that, but I don't know if he will.
 
Back
Top Bottom