The CFC-OT Consolidated Political Compass Test (CPCT)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not sure that I understand. Do you believe that animals have private property? Do you imagine that this belief is widely-shared by scholars?

I think the argument is that private property is the evolutionary descendant of animal territory.
 
It seems like a moot point. I think any evolutionary psychology theory about property rights would overlap well enough with the left's idea of personal property.
 
https://www.gotoquiz.com/politics/political-spectrum-quiz.html

zR77RHr.png


concerning
 
Bored before bed. Took both. Did on phone, forgive me if the images are crappy or weird sizes.

DCD70C10-916A-40AF-9052-04B6C66C5412.jpeg


974D32D1-DD71-417B-BA30-2CBBB3564E00.jpeg


Evidently I’m a moderate traditionalist puritan social libertarian.

:dunno:
 
I'm a 'left social authoritarian', apparently. For some reason it only showed my military and culture war sliders, neither of which were to the left.
 
Last edited:
Left wing libertarian. Pretty much in the middle of the bottom left quadrant.
 
zLJYeps.jpg

BFeAd87.jpg

seVOhAX.jpg

T17fnli.jpg
 
You are a far-left social libertarian.
Left: 9.21, Libertarian: 4.48

WZxH344.jpg


Slightly more authoritarian than I tended to show in the old political compass. I guess my inner Bolshevik is making his way out.
 
According to the quiz, I’ve landed on:
You are a center-left moderate social libertarian.
Left: 1.96, Libertarian: 1.3

Forgien Policy: 2.5

Culture War: -1.42

Odd given my aversion to wokeism and SJWs. The quiz placed me slightly to the left on the culture war spectrum :confused:.
 
Then what produces inequality? Communists seem to view eliminating property rights as their central task.

This is actually a pretty common misconception about Marxism. The aim has nothing to do with inequality. Marx well notes that equality is a paradox and literally unachievable (i.e. for two sticks to be equal they would literally have to be the same stick, for otherwise if you make them equal in some respect, you necessarily will make them unequal in some other respect). This is why the guiding principle of Marx's communism is not "total equality," but rather "from each according to ability, to each according to need."

The ultimate goal for Marx was not equality or justice - indeed he saw the former as impossible and the latter as arbitrary/socially conditioned - but rather freedom and democracy. What he wanted was a society where the choices of all human people were no longer constrained by material forces in the form of the state and the bosses, and that therefore all humans would finally be able to realize their full species being. Marx thought that the only way for this freedom to be possible would be by an organized proletarian movement. The elimination of *private* property isn't the central task of communism. The central task is to seize the means of production and reorganize them democratically to distribute according to need. Eliminating private property is a major component of this as the means of production are delineated as private property under capitalism, but that's rather like saying the central task of anti-monarchists is the elimination of crown lands. Like yeah, sure that's a major and necessary task in abolishing the monarchy, but it's hardly the only, or even the central task in doing so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom