No. My point is that the Koran has a set of ideas and values that are incompatible with European societies. My point is that Islam is not equal to Koran, as the Bible is not equal to Christianity.
Your point relies on: Islam is the Koran. This is where we disagree.
Disregarding the blatant look-at-me hyperbolic strawman in that, are you also wondering what you would call yourself, since you clearly don't live according to the Bible?I am just wondering what you would call a person who claims to be a Marxist, but ignores what Marx says?
Is that hard enough for you to understand?
Which all goes to prove my point! Imagine how much more bloodthirsty the Danes and Swedes would have been had they not converted to Christianity.
I've never heard Marxism defined as "the teachings of Marx". I don't even know what "the teachings of Marx" would refer to. He left no gospel, revelation, or scripture of any kind, and there exist no canonical or even coherent recollections of his words and deeds. Perhaps the analogy needs refinement?A Christian is one who follows the teaching of Christ. Just like someone who is a Marxist because they follow the teachings of Marx. Is that hard enough for you to understand?
Well, in the first place, The Manifesto of the Communist Party was written in 1848, when Marx was thirty and Engels twenty-eight. Marx died in 1883 at the age of sixty-four, and Engels died in 1895 at the age of seventy-four. The Manifesto couldn't possibly provide any exhaustive account of their lives' works.I thought the Communist Manifesto contained, if not the teachings of Marx, then at least what Marx expected would happen to society, which people developed into ideologies both coherent and nonsensical.
hardly a body of teachings comparable to those of Jesus or Muhammad.
I am just wondering what you would call a person who claims to be a Marxist, but ignores what Marx says?