So why not import a better culture?
They're corporate secrets, the companies will not give them away.
So why not import a better culture?
Does anyone know if you're allowed to take breakfast cereal and powdered milk into Singapore and Malaysia as a tourist?
During the Yugoslav wars, organized criminal syndicates throughout the Balkans effectively hijacked most state institutions and subordinated them to their interests. In Pakistan and India at exactly the same time, the opposite was happening: the gang wars of Bombay that exploded with renewed violence in the 1990s were in part a proxy conflict between the intelligence agencies of India and Pakistan, ensuring that they were even more dangerous and unpredictable than hitherto.
I bought a go pro 3+ silver
Turns out that this thing goes through memory cards at the speed of insanity... I will likely prefer to leave the thing on the highest possible settings.. so.. I think that means about 3 hours of recording time on a 32gb card? or even a 64gb card maybe? I haven't done the math yet, so I could be off by quite a bit, but the sales person @ Costco assures me that I will have problems. I think I believe him.
A "passport" type of portable 1TB storage device was recommended to me.. but I didn't get it yet - wanted to do more research. What do people recommend? It seems to be cheaper to buy 2 memory cards and 1 storage device like that (which doesn't seem to be very big or heavy - good for backpacking & hiking) rather than 15 memory cards.
Any tips?
So I was wondering, what's worse: criminal organizations using government institutions or the opposite?
I think the first one sounds worse, at least by a bitSo I was wondering, what's worse: criminal organizations using government institutions or the opposite?
Well unless you're carrying have a computer or some type of specialized device, you can't transfer anything from an sd card to a hard drive anyway.
You're going to be limited to <3 hours of battery for video when you're mobile anyway.
I have heard the term "slippery slope" many times, but I don't know what it's supposed to mean.
So what does it mean?
It's the fallacious assumption that just because one thing happened, other superficially similar but meaningfully unrelated things must surely follow.
For example:
"Gay marriage has been legalized in the US - what's next? legalized polygamy? bestiality? pedophilia?!?"
None of these things will happen as a direct consequence of the first thing. They are individual, unrelated instances. The arguer is drawing an unverified connection between the first relatively uncontroversial to other unconnected more inflammatory things to scare their audience/interlocutor out of supporting the first thing apropos of nothing.
Is it homophobic to be offended by gay men taking about male genitalia? If so, then are you equally offended by straight men men talking about breasts?