sophie
Break My Heart
Brett "I WENT TO YALE" Kavanaugh went to Yale.
Brett "I WENT TO YALE" Kavanaugh went to Yale.
And he was a virgin, I have to point out.
Is that an observation or a challenge?
I hope that is loose on twitter.
I hope that is loose on twitter.
No surprise that "they" state that nationalisation is bad.
But let's keep the discussion focused and handle the points made forward one by one and not shift away before one point is properly brought to an end:
below you say they stated: "The moment they point to when everything started to go wrong was when Labour were elected after the end of World War II".
My counter argument to them is that even an anti Labour, and for sure also an anti-nationalisation newspaper did not dare to attack Attlee, the Labour PM directly after WW2, despite the nationalisations he did.
The Daily Mail not dare to say that Labour did it wrong after the end of WW2, because it is not the general opinion of the older generations that experienced the advabtages.
Your friends are ideologigal driven theorists inventing their own history for their own theoretical beliefs.
Agree ?
BTW Attlee did not nationalise British Leyland, that happened much later when Attlee was dead.
Attlee nationalised utilities: gas, electricity, water and nationalised transport like railways, public transport, civil aviation and nationalised basic industries like coal mining, steel and ofc the Bank of England.
I think most citizens of the UK would still prefer that utilities and domestic public transport should be nationalised.
Perhaps your friends are also against the nationalisation of the Bank of England and want it back to be the commercial Bank it was before 1946 ?
Wait, hold on: has Chukchi's friend been Boris Johnson this whole time?
Ah. The famous "the only way to end all wars is conquer everyone" theory. In the US this takes the form that instead of building NATO as an alliance European countries, including the USSR, needed to be straight up vassalized, one way or another, and brought under direct rule of the US. We had the bomb, and had demonstrated the will to use it. That was our moment. Fools let the moment pass and stole the world's opportunity for real peace under enlightened American rule.
There is a reason that the plan at the time was called "Operation Unthinkable". America would not have gone along with it - Truman was busy trying to set up the United Nations and handle all the brewing decolonization conflicts. The British general staff rejected the plan as militarily unfeasible. Further, there is basically no chance any of the Dominions would have gone along with it. Australia and New Zealand were starting to drift to the American orbit due to the small role the UK played in the Pacific Island campaigns. India had made it clear they were leaving, and it is doubtful Canada would have gone along with it. Britain's strength in the war came from ruling an empire that covered a quarter of the world and a fifth of its population - not because Albion is endowed with some mystical power to emerge victorious is all situations.
As an aside, why should Churchill have been re-elected? The Tories were still closely associated with the interwar period and the mass unemployment - like the Jarrow March- while Labour had distinguished itself in office during the Wartime Coalition. Labour had a plan to rebuild bombed out houses and cities -echoing Lloyd George's "Home for Heroes" campaign- while the Tory manifesto was basically "I guess people like the Beveridge Report". Plus, Churchill put his foot in his mouth on numerous occasions, such as commenting that a Labour government would see Gestapo kicking down your door in five years. That would be a tactless thing to say now, let alone while the Second World War was still raging. Small wonder the Tories wiped out in the 1945 General Election.
Seriously Chukchi, your friends are morons. The taxation of aristocratic estates to fund social welfare policies began in 1910 with the People's Budget. Labour as a mass political party wasn't really a Thing at this stage, so the People's Budget was championed by the Liberals -lead by Lloyd George- and, guess who? Winston Churchill.
No, it is a reference to Labour's 1983 manifesto which was very left wing -unilateral nuclear disarmament, withdrawing from the EEC, and mass nationalization. Strong arguments have been put forward that the manifesto was intentionally sabotaged by some on the Labour right who wanted to "discredit" Foot in order to force Labour to swing right. Labour was also hamstrung by the defection of several of its most prominent members to form the SDP, splitting the anti-Thatcher vote. (Fun fact, the anti-Thatcher vote (Labour and SDP) combined got over 50% of the vote -the Tories just got 42%, but somehow the Tories ended up with an over 150 seat majority. Best argument against FPTP I've seen in a while.)
If morons like that god university degrees, I pity the state of the British education system.
Chukchi, these friends of yours may have university degrees which you do not have, but they are telling you logically flawed arguments that also are based on partially or completely untrue information.
They keep telling me that they are completely logical and unbiased.
Run away!One of them has been compared to Boris Johnson to the point where when others try to describe Boris Johnson, they point to them and say that he is an older version of them.