The Very-Many-Questions-Not-Worth-Their-Own-Thread Thread XLIII

The trial went very fast today. 3 prosecution witnesses, one defendant witness (him); We, the jury, got the case at 3:45 and in an hour the defendant was convicted on all three charges.

I was surprised too. The prosecution had 3 witnesses: the victim, an expert and a detective. The victim was the defendant's younger brother. The charges were sexual abuse, providing alcohol and providing drug s to a minor (14 years old). The Defense had one witness after lunch: the defendant (20 years old at the time). Closing arguments followed around 3:00 and after jury instructions, we got the case just before 4:00. It took us less than an hour to find the defendant guilty on all counts.

I think this trial was probably pretty typical of a low profile criminal trial that was mostly unnoticed except for the parties involved. The brothers were inarticulate and rambling, the attorneys presented their cases but they seemed almost too focused and left lots of questions unanswered. Cross examinations seemed lackluster. The defendant's response to most questions was "I can't recall." Closings ran less than 10 minutes. The prosecution did present a pretty good case given what they had to work with. The defense had a hard job and could only muster up "They were both so drunk and drugged no one will ever know what actually happened. You must acquit on all counts."
 
Does anyone know if it is already possible to buy tickets for Harbin Ice Festival in January? You can book pricey day trips which include the ticket and I could find prices for next year, but can't find any official page where to buy them.
 
Does anyone know if it is already possible to buy tickets for Harbin Ice Festival in January? You can book pricey day trips which include the ticket and I could find prices for next year, but can't find any official page where to buy them.

Scroll down for tickets and advice on going.
 
Is this a good walk-in closet design for a fairly small walk-in closet?

qVxkvxT.png


I am using Ikea's BOAXEL modular pieces for this. For whatever reason they only make the bracket (that you attach to the wall and stuff to) 198cm tall. My ceiling is up at 243cm

My idea is to mount the BOAXEL brackets as high as you can. That way on the longer wall (on the right) I can have two vertical hang thingies for shirts, jackets, robes, etc. I haven't measured this out fully, but it seems like it will give me a lot of hanging room. Seems like an efficient use of that wall and it gives me an extra shelf I can maybe put some scarves or toques on. It would be amazing if I could fit some shoe racks underneath, but I don't think there's enough room. I will measure it out though and find out for sure

On the shorter wall I am left with enough room to install the exact same bracket. But there I want to put up shelves for folded up shirts, pajamas, etc. The basket things at the bottom will be for socks, swim trunks, and intimates. Here the benefit of mounting the bracket as high up as it will go is that I will be able to leave myself enough room at teh bottom for a shoe rack. I found one at Ikea that's 37 cm tall, and here I have 45 cm clearing. That should give me enough room for 3 rows of shoes. And I figure the top shelf can have my sleeping bag, sleeping mat, maybe tent.

Alternatively I can mount this bracket a bit lower, and hope that the shoe rack can go against the other wall. I can then move all shelves up and have them basically be as high up as they currently are. It gives me the option of installing 1 extra shelf basically, but I lose the optoin to put a shoe rack underneath it all, and could probably only have a row of shoes standing on the ground there instead.

On the other other hand, installing all the brackests snug against the ceiling will make it possible to line up the shelves from all 3 brackets.

Which approach would you take? Would you change anything? At first I tried doing this with the PAX and with another Ikea system, but they have enclosures and take up more space. This solution seems to fill out the limited space efficiently.

The other walls have a door and window that prevent the installation of pretty much anything, so they can be ignored.
 
How many shirts do you own?
Dressy long sleeve? Casual Short sleeve?
How many of your pants need hangers rather than being folded?
Do you need a place to hang belts?
Where will you put your socks, underpants, and shorts?

Your picture seems to have too much hanger space.
That system looks very inflexible and long shelves can get very messy and disorganized. Cloth bins on shelves are good for rolled socks. Count how many of each type of item you have/need. Stack them up to see how much space they actually take. For example, for summer and winter I have a total of 6 pair of pjs. They fit nicely into one shelf of a 12"x12"x 6 level wire frame shelving. Underwear in another, T shirts in one, jeans in one, long sleeve Ts in another. Socks in a two cloth bins.

Goals: easy access; separation; minimal mixing or falling out/off. Long shelves have three ways to fall: left, right, off. Vertical barriers reduce that to one. |_________| vs |__|__|__|__|
 

Scroll down for tickets and advice on going.
Thank you, the advice is good and explains it well - so no tickets yet for non residents and they also just link to a travel agency who will plan a whole trip and put you on a priority list until tickets are available.
 
How many shirts do you own?
Dressy long sleeve? Casual Short sleeve?
How many of your pants need hangers rather than being folded?
Do you need a place to hang belts?
Where will you put your socks, underpants, and shorts?

Your picture seems to have too much hanger space.
That system looks very inflexible and long shelves can get very messy and disorganized. Cloth bins on shelves are good for rolled socks. Count how many of each type of item you have/need. Stack them up to see how much space they actually take. For example, for summer and winter I have a total of 6 pair of pjs. They fit nicely into one shelf of a 12"x12"x 6 level wire frame shelving. Underwear in another, T shirts in one, jeans in one, long sleeve Ts in another. Socks in a two cloth bins.

Goals: easy access; separation; minimal mixing or falling out/off. Long shelves have three ways to fall: left, right, off. Vertical barriers reduce that to one. |_________| vs |__|__|__|__|

Thanks for the suggestions and feedback! Responses below:

Your picture seems to have too much hanger space. The new design would give me about 30% more hanger space than I currently have and I do not have enough. I have 7 or so football/soccer jerseys, a couple suits, winter jackets, fall/spring jackets, a windbreaker, several dress shirts, and on top of that i want enough space to hang a decent amount of the shirts I wear day to day, plus some room for future wardrobe expansion.

How many shirts do you own? Tough to say, there's about 4 dress shirts, 3-4 polo like shirts, 10 or so other assorted shirts, plus the 7 or so football jerseys. I also inherited a whole bunch of my dad's stuff, so I'm probably undercounting. And oh yeah, on top of that I have a couple fleece midlayer thingies and a couple hoodies and a sweater or two.

How many of your pants need hangers rather than being folded? My plan is to basically only hang pants if there is room, tops get complete 100% hanging priority. One of the shelves is supposed to be dedicated to pants and maybe shorts.

Do you need a place to hang belts?
I have completely forgotten to consider belt storage in my design, but I only have 2 belts and am always wearing one of them. The backup belt will probably be rolled up and potentially stored on one of the shelves.

Where will you put your socks, underpants, and shorts? One of those basket things at the bottom is for socks, the other one for underpants and maybe shorts.

Shelves can get very messy and disorganized. This is a good point. It's sort of yet another reason why I have so much hanger space in my design. I'd rather shirts hang rather than be folded. Folding is like 5-6 steps. Hanging is one step. It's also easier to inspect a shirt that's hanging. HOWEVER, my mom has a folded shirt on shelf system and it seems to be working well. So I think it will be good to have shirts folded and on a shelf that I don't wear very often and I think I can make it work. Basically I'd hang as many shirts as feasible, and everything else can get the fold treatment. So ideally I'd want a decent amount of shelf space, but more hanging space. With my design I'm getting 30% more hanging space and at least double the current shelf space... So I might end up with a shelf or two empty.. but that's good, it leaves me room for wardrobe expansion (not planned, but who knows what the future will bring)

They fit nicely into one shelf of a 12"x12"x 6 level wire frame shelving To confirm, you are saying that it would be better to store everything found on a shelf in a 3-dimension storage container as opposed to leaving it out bare on the shelf? The two basket shelves I have in my design, at the bottom, for the socks and underpants, I didn't think that would work well for folded shirts (although maybe??). I could get a box thing to put on top of the shelf, but it seems that just adds extra steps. Shelf seems optimal for folded up shirts, but maybe I'm underestimating the full benefits of a box?

Long shelves have three ways to fall In this case I do get that down to two, the shelves would be as close to the side wall as possible. Yeah, there'd be a small gap there, but not large enough for a shirt. I am forseeing not using any of the shelves to the extreme, so it should be easy to manage the shirtload and keep things manageable and organized well on the shelf. But maybe you can convince me otherwise! I do like the appeal of those baskets. They just seem to work with smaller items like socks so much better, with shirts you'll have to pull out all the shirts if you want one in the middle. On a shelf you can do that much easier.
 
Last edited:
I'll post some pics tomorrow.
 
Pics coming, but I have shirts on hangers racks that have 60 shirts (of dress and flannel) per 1 meter.
 
1762304109208.jpeg



1762304258718.jpeg




1762304397316.jpeg
 
I dig that cube sock/shirt containment system you have got set up, I don't think I've seen anything like that from IKEA, but I will take a look again. The issue with my walkin closet is that it's quite small (165cm x 145cm), so not much fits in it. No other IKEA storage system fits in it unless things overlap, except for the one I selected (and posted the picture of)

And I mean, I'm not 100% set on IKEA but I have 2 other pieces of furniture I want to order for them, a bathroom piece, and an office storage thingy.. So I'm waiting for a "Free delivery to your front door today!" email, and then just order everything I need all at once. If I branch out for my walkin closet needs, that's fine, but it'll mean two separate orders. I will look though, see what else is out there. I dig the cube system you've got, but honestly I don't know if the side walls are that important tbh. I will look around more though to see what other options I have.

I've been very happy with IKEA wrt the billy bookshelves I have set up in my home library, and the PAX storage system i have got from them for two closets, plus a TV stand. So I'm tempted to stick with them for that reason also, but will spread out my search to see what else I can squeeze in that small walkin closet of mine. The picture I posted of what I'm thinking still appeals to me, but I have zero experience setting up walkin closts - I bet that 6 months from now I'll wish I had done things a bit differently. So I'm trying to overthink and overplan now, so I have zero regrets later
 
is using "and/or" considered acceptable in formal/academic writing?
I would say you need to be sure it is appropriate. Is there really ambiguity in if the relationship you are talking about is an "and" or an "or" relationship? Have you addressed that? If so, I would say yes, but the correct uses are few and far between.
 
say you have two methods to determine something. method A is time-consuming, method B is destructive and time-consuming. I want to say: 'the traditional methods of determining something are destructive and/or time-consuming'
 
say you have two methods to determine something. method A is time-consuming, method B is destructive and time-consuming. I want to say: 'the traditional methods of determining something are destructive and/or time-consuming'
I think I would use and/or in that situation, especially if at some other point in the document you provide the details you include here.
 
I do not, this is the introduction
I am less certain of the answer in that case. I generally think any ambiguity should be avoided in academic writing. Perhaps others with more experience of writing will chip in.
 
You could say, "nothing short of destructive, and in the best case, nothing less than time-consuming."

Or "time-consuming at least and potentially even destructive"
 
Does anyone know if it is already possible to buy tickets for Harbin Ice Festival in January? You can book pricey day trips which include the ticket and I could find prices for next year, but can't find any official page where to buy them.

I went to the Harbin Ice Festival back in 2006. I was staying in China at the time not too far away. I don’t remember anything about advance tickets, we just showed up and got in. It wasn’t terribly crowded. Maybe things have changed.
 
“DEAR MISS MANNERS: I know you’re going to think this is a made-up letter, but I assure you it’s not. (But then, I’d say that even if it were, wouldn’t I?)

When one has been invited to stay overnight in a home without indoor plumbing, but is provided with a chamber pot (no lid) under the bed, what does one do with it the next morning? Leave it? Ask one’s hostess? What if you don’t speak her language?

This happened to my husband and me a few years back, when we were camping in Europe. The people who owned the land were horrified to think of our sleeping outside in the cold. With hand gestures, they made it clear that they would be insulted if we did not accept their hospitality for the night.

Not wanting to be ugly Americans, we did. They generously gave us their own bedroom, which included the aforesaid chamber pot. Necessity compelled us to use it. But the next morning ...

We wound up leaving it in the room, but I still wonder: What was the correct thing to have done?

GENTLE READER: If you are able to decipher “Stay in our bedroom or you’re an ugly American” from a hand gesture, Miss Manners feels certain you can figure out one for, “There is poop in the potty; what do we do with it?”

Because no doubt your hosts came up with their own hand gesture when they discovered your unpleasant surprise.“

This was in Europe only a few years ago. Were they absolutely sure this house didn’t have indoor plumbing and that this was a chamber pot? If so, I’d think they must have had an outhouse and the chamber pot was maybe just for peeing.

Reminds me recently I read something on Quora, someone said he was staying at a pension in France a long time ago and he asked about a bath. He had a nice bath and the next day asked the owners about using the bathtub again. They told him once a week was the maximum.
 
Back
Top Bottom